白试验预防肝切除术后胆漏的有效性评价:多中心随机对照研究。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Oleg G Skipenko, Arkady L Bedzhanyan, Nikita K Chardarov, Irina B Ermak, Andrew D Ermak, Oleg O Rummo, Dzmitry A Fedoruk, Oleg G Kotenko, Airazat M Kazaryan
{"title":"白试验预防肝切除术后胆漏的有效性评价:多中心随机对照研究。","authors":"Oleg G Skipenko, Arkady L Bedzhanyan, Nikita K Chardarov, Irina B Ermak, Andrew D Ermak, Oleg O Rummo, Dzmitry A Fedoruk, Oleg G Kotenko, Airazat M Kazaryan","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02210-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bile leakage is a common complication after liver resection. It often requires repeated interventions or surgery and prolongs the patient's recovery. The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of the leakage test with fat emulsion (the White Test) in preventing postoperative biliary complications. A multicenter (3 hospitals) randomized controlled trial was performed from February 2011 to May 2016. The trial involved only the patients scheduled for major hepatectomies. After liver transection and control of biliary tree leak-proofness, the patients were randomized into two groups-with and without applying the White Test. A comparative assessment of all the White Test participants was conducted. Forty-three patients formed the study group, and 36 patients were included in the control group. The White Test revealed sites of bile leakage (the positive White Test) in 37.2% (16/43) of the patients in the study group. These leakage sites were sealed intraoperatively. One of those patients (6.2%; 1/16) still developed bile leakage after surgery. Bile leakage was still observed in 7.4% (2/27) of patients after the negative White test. The incidence of postoperatively revealed bile leakage in the study and control groups did not have a statistically significant difference: 7% (3/43) and 8.3% (3/36), respectively. All bile leaks were grade B. This study demonstrated that the White Test did not provide any benefit in preventing postoperative bile leakage; therefore, other methods, such as ICG, should be further investigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the white test effectiveness for the prevention of bile leakage after liver resection: multicenter randomized controlled study.\",\"authors\":\"Oleg G Skipenko, Arkady L Bedzhanyan, Nikita K Chardarov, Irina B Ermak, Andrew D Ermak, Oleg O Rummo, Dzmitry A Fedoruk, Oleg G Kotenko, Airazat M Kazaryan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13304-025-02210-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bile leakage is a common complication after liver resection. It often requires repeated interventions or surgery and prolongs the patient's recovery. The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of the leakage test with fat emulsion (the White Test) in preventing postoperative biliary complications. A multicenter (3 hospitals) randomized controlled trial was performed from February 2011 to May 2016. The trial involved only the patients scheduled for major hepatectomies. After liver transection and control of biliary tree leak-proofness, the patients were randomized into two groups-with and without applying the White Test. A comparative assessment of all the White Test participants was conducted. Forty-three patients formed the study group, and 36 patients were included in the control group. The White Test revealed sites of bile leakage (the positive White Test) in 37.2% (16/43) of the patients in the study group. These leakage sites were sealed intraoperatively. One of those patients (6.2%; 1/16) still developed bile leakage after surgery. Bile leakage was still observed in 7.4% (2/27) of patients after the negative White test. The incidence of postoperatively revealed bile leakage in the study and control groups did not have a statistically significant difference: 7% (3/43) and 8.3% (3/36), respectively. All bile leaks were grade B. This study demonstrated that the White Test did not provide any benefit in preventing postoperative bile leakage; therefore, other methods, such as ICG, should be further investigated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02210-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02210-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胆漏是肝切除术后常见的并发症。它通常需要反复干预或手术,并延长患者的恢复时间。本研究的目的是评估脂肪乳渗漏试验(White试验)在预防术后胆道并发症方面的有效性。2011年2月至2016年5月进行了一项多中心(3家医院)随机对照试验。该试验仅涉及计划进行大肝切除术的患者。在肝切除和控制胆道密闭性后,将患者随机分为两组-使用和不使用怀特试验。对所有白人测试参与者进行了比较评估。研究组43例,对照组36例。研究组中有37.2%(16/43)的患者在White Test中发现胆漏部位(White Test阳性)。术中对这些渗漏部位进行封堵。其中1例(6.2%;1/16)术后仍发生胆漏。White试验阴性后仍有7.4%(2/27)的患者出现胆漏。研究组与对照组术后胆漏发生率差异无统计学意义,分别为7%(3/43)和8.3%(3/36)。所有胆漏均为b级。该研究表明,White试验在预防术后胆漏方面没有任何益处;因此,其他方法,如ICG,应进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the white test effectiveness for the prevention of bile leakage after liver resection: multicenter randomized controlled study.

Bile leakage is a common complication after liver resection. It often requires repeated interventions or surgery and prolongs the patient's recovery. The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of the leakage test with fat emulsion (the White Test) in preventing postoperative biliary complications. A multicenter (3 hospitals) randomized controlled trial was performed from February 2011 to May 2016. The trial involved only the patients scheduled for major hepatectomies. After liver transection and control of biliary tree leak-proofness, the patients were randomized into two groups-with and without applying the White Test. A comparative assessment of all the White Test participants was conducted. Forty-three patients formed the study group, and 36 patients were included in the control group. The White Test revealed sites of bile leakage (the positive White Test) in 37.2% (16/43) of the patients in the study group. These leakage sites were sealed intraoperatively. One of those patients (6.2%; 1/16) still developed bile leakage after surgery. Bile leakage was still observed in 7.4% (2/27) of patients after the negative White test. The incidence of postoperatively revealed bile leakage in the study and control groups did not have a statistically significant difference: 7% (3/43) and 8.3% (3/36), respectively. All bile leaks were grade B. This study demonstrated that the White Test did not provide any benefit in preventing postoperative bile leakage; therefore, other methods, such as ICG, should be further investigated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信