新西兰奥特罗阿复杂轮椅评估的远程医疗交付的混合方法现实分析:背景,机制和结果。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Fiona Graham, Laura Desha, Pauline Boland, Bernadette Jones, Sandie Grant, Rachel Brown, Jonathan Williman, Rebecca Grainger
{"title":"新西兰奥特罗阿复杂轮椅评估的远程医疗交付的混合方法现实分析:背景,机制和结果。","authors":"Fiona Graham, Laura Desha, Pauline Boland, Bernadette Jones, Sandie Grant, Rachel Brown, Jonathan Williman, Rebecca Grainger","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2025.2492361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined telehealth delivery of complex wheelchair assessment in Aotearoa New Zealand, specifically: what works, for whom, and in which contexts, with exploration of culturally specific factors for indigenous Māori.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A mixed methods realist evaluation was conducted with remote specialist assessors (physiotherapists and occupational therapists), on-site assistants, and wheelchair users. Interviews/focus groups, mobility goal achievement, satisfaction, and fidelity of tele-delivered assessment of wheelchair and seating (tAWS) contributed to Context-Mechanism-Outcome configurations (CMOc).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four remote specialist assessors delivered tAWS, but it was declined by on-site assistants in 78% of cases in which specialist assessors perceived it could work. When tAWS was delivered to wheelchair users (<i>N</i> = 5), the majority of goals were achieved, with high service satisfaction. CMOc's highlight the influence of system design in the uptake of telehealth by health professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While therapists can navigate complexity for successful tAWS, therapist and system barriers limit its uptake, particularly confidence in conducting assessment and use of technology among the non-adopters. Telehealth specific training in culturally-responsive rehabilitation is recommended. This evaluation contributes to telehealth program theory and the mechanisms to be addressed for telehealth to meet its potential to enhance equity in health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A mixed methods realist analysis of telehealth delivery of complex wheelchair assessment in Aotearoa New Zealand: contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Fiona Graham, Laura Desha, Pauline Boland, Bernadette Jones, Sandie Grant, Rachel Brown, Jonathan Williman, Rebecca Grainger\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17483107.2025.2492361\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined telehealth delivery of complex wheelchair assessment in Aotearoa New Zealand, specifically: what works, for whom, and in which contexts, with exploration of culturally specific factors for indigenous Māori.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A mixed methods realist evaluation was conducted with remote specialist assessors (physiotherapists and occupational therapists), on-site assistants, and wheelchair users. Interviews/focus groups, mobility goal achievement, satisfaction, and fidelity of tele-delivered assessment of wheelchair and seating (tAWS) contributed to Context-Mechanism-Outcome configurations (CMOc).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four remote specialist assessors delivered tAWS, but it was declined by on-site assistants in 78% of cases in which specialist assessors perceived it could work. When tAWS was delivered to wheelchair users (<i>N</i> = 5), the majority of goals were achieved, with high service satisfaction. CMOc's highlight the influence of system design in the uptake of telehealth by health professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While therapists can navigate complexity for successful tAWS, therapist and system barriers limit its uptake, particularly confidence in conducting assessment and use of technology among the non-adopters. Telehealth specific training in culturally-responsive rehabilitation is recommended. This evaluation contributes to telehealth program theory and the mechanisms to be addressed for telehealth to meet its potential to enhance equity in health outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2492361\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2492361","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究考察了新西兰奥特罗阿复杂轮椅评估的远程医疗服务,特别是:什么有效,为谁有效,在什么情况下有效,并探索土著Māori的文化特定因素。材料和方法:对远程专家评估员(物理治疗师和职业治疗师)、现场助理和轮椅使用者进行混合方法现实评估。访谈/焦点小组、移动性目标实现、满意度和远程交付的轮椅和座椅评估(tAWS)的保真度有助于形成情境-机制-结果配置(CMOc)。结果:4名远程专家评估员提供tAWS,但在78%的专家评估员认为它可以工作的情况下,现场助理拒绝了tAWS。当向轮椅使用者(N = 5)提供tAWS时,大部分目标都达到了,服务满意度很高。CMOc强调了系统设计对卫生专业人员接受远程医疗的影响。结论:虽然治疗师可以驾驭成功的tAWS的复杂性,但治疗师和系统的障碍限制了它的吸收,特别是在非采用率中进行评估和使用技术的信心。建议在适应文化的康复方面进行远程保健专门培训。这一评价有助于远程医疗方案理论和远程医疗要解决的机制,以满足其潜力,以提高公平的健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A mixed methods realist analysis of telehealth delivery of complex wheelchair assessment in Aotearoa New Zealand: contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes.

Purpose: This study examined telehealth delivery of complex wheelchair assessment in Aotearoa New Zealand, specifically: what works, for whom, and in which contexts, with exploration of culturally specific factors for indigenous Māori.

Materials and methods: A mixed methods realist evaluation was conducted with remote specialist assessors (physiotherapists and occupational therapists), on-site assistants, and wheelchair users. Interviews/focus groups, mobility goal achievement, satisfaction, and fidelity of tele-delivered assessment of wheelchair and seating (tAWS) contributed to Context-Mechanism-Outcome configurations (CMOc).

Results: Four remote specialist assessors delivered tAWS, but it was declined by on-site assistants in 78% of cases in which specialist assessors perceived it could work. When tAWS was delivered to wheelchair users (N = 5), the majority of goals were achieved, with high service satisfaction. CMOc's highlight the influence of system design in the uptake of telehealth by health professionals.

Conclusions: While therapists can navigate complexity for successful tAWS, therapist and system barriers limit its uptake, particularly confidence in conducting assessment and use of technology among the non-adopters. Telehealth specific training in culturally-responsive rehabilitation is recommended. This evaluation contributes to telehealth program theory and the mechanisms to be addressed for telehealth to meet its potential to enhance equity in health outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信