Fiona Graham, Laura Desha, Pauline Boland, Bernadette Jones, Sandie Grant, Rachel Brown, Jonathan Williman, Rebecca Grainger
{"title":"新西兰奥特罗阿复杂轮椅评估的远程医疗交付的混合方法现实分析:背景,机制和结果。","authors":"Fiona Graham, Laura Desha, Pauline Boland, Bernadette Jones, Sandie Grant, Rachel Brown, Jonathan Williman, Rebecca Grainger","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2025.2492361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined telehealth delivery of complex wheelchair assessment in Aotearoa New Zealand, specifically: what works, for whom, and in which contexts, with exploration of culturally specific factors for indigenous Māori.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A mixed methods realist evaluation was conducted with remote specialist assessors (physiotherapists and occupational therapists), on-site assistants, and wheelchair users. Interviews/focus groups, mobility goal achievement, satisfaction, and fidelity of tele-delivered assessment of wheelchair and seating (tAWS) contributed to Context-Mechanism-Outcome configurations (CMOc).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four remote specialist assessors delivered tAWS, but it was declined by on-site assistants in 78% of cases in which specialist assessors perceived it could work. When tAWS was delivered to wheelchair users (<i>N</i> = 5), the majority of goals were achieved, with high service satisfaction. CMOc's highlight the influence of system design in the uptake of telehealth by health professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While therapists can navigate complexity for successful tAWS, therapist and system barriers limit its uptake, particularly confidence in conducting assessment and use of technology among the non-adopters. Telehealth specific training in culturally-responsive rehabilitation is recommended. This evaluation contributes to telehealth program theory and the mechanisms to be addressed for telehealth to meet its potential to enhance equity in health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A mixed methods realist analysis of telehealth delivery of complex wheelchair assessment in Aotearoa New Zealand: contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Fiona Graham, Laura Desha, Pauline Boland, Bernadette Jones, Sandie Grant, Rachel Brown, Jonathan Williman, Rebecca Grainger\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17483107.2025.2492361\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined telehealth delivery of complex wheelchair assessment in Aotearoa New Zealand, specifically: what works, for whom, and in which contexts, with exploration of culturally specific factors for indigenous Māori.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A mixed methods realist evaluation was conducted with remote specialist assessors (physiotherapists and occupational therapists), on-site assistants, and wheelchair users. Interviews/focus groups, mobility goal achievement, satisfaction, and fidelity of tele-delivered assessment of wheelchair and seating (tAWS) contributed to Context-Mechanism-Outcome configurations (CMOc).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four remote specialist assessors delivered tAWS, but it was declined by on-site assistants in 78% of cases in which specialist assessors perceived it could work. When tAWS was delivered to wheelchair users (<i>N</i> = 5), the majority of goals were achieved, with high service satisfaction. CMOc's highlight the influence of system design in the uptake of telehealth by health professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While therapists can navigate complexity for successful tAWS, therapist and system barriers limit its uptake, particularly confidence in conducting assessment and use of technology among the non-adopters. Telehealth specific training in culturally-responsive rehabilitation is recommended. This evaluation contributes to telehealth program theory and the mechanisms to be addressed for telehealth to meet its potential to enhance equity in health outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2492361\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2492361","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
A mixed methods realist analysis of telehealth delivery of complex wheelchair assessment in Aotearoa New Zealand: contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes.
Purpose: This study examined telehealth delivery of complex wheelchair assessment in Aotearoa New Zealand, specifically: what works, for whom, and in which contexts, with exploration of culturally specific factors for indigenous Māori.
Materials and methods: A mixed methods realist evaluation was conducted with remote specialist assessors (physiotherapists and occupational therapists), on-site assistants, and wheelchair users. Interviews/focus groups, mobility goal achievement, satisfaction, and fidelity of tele-delivered assessment of wheelchair and seating (tAWS) contributed to Context-Mechanism-Outcome configurations (CMOc).
Results: Four remote specialist assessors delivered tAWS, but it was declined by on-site assistants in 78% of cases in which specialist assessors perceived it could work. When tAWS was delivered to wheelchair users (N = 5), the majority of goals were achieved, with high service satisfaction. CMOc's highlight the influence of system design in the uptake of telehealth by health professionals.
Conclusions: While therapists can navigate complexity for successful tAWS, therapist and system barriers limit its uptake, particularly confidence in conducting assessment and use of technology among the non-adopters. Telehealth specific training in culturally-responsive rehabilitation is recommended. This evaluation contributes to telehealth program theory and the mechanisms to be addressed for telehealth to meet its potential to enhance equity in health outcomes.