制定利用实施科学预防自杀的指南:一项国际德尔菲专家共识研究。

BMJ public health Pub Date : 2025-04-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjph-2024-001206
Sadhvi Krishnamoorthy, Gregory Armstrong, Victoria Ross, Lennart Reifels, Hayley Purdon, Jillian Francis, Jacinta Hawgood, Sharna Mathieu, Alexandr Kasal, Allison Crawford, Allison M Gustavson, András Székely, Anna Baran, Annette Erlangsen, Ashley Nemiro, Chez Curnow, Daniel Reidenberg, Daria Biechowska, Ella Arensman, Emmanuel Nii-Boye Quarshie, Fiona Shand, Caroline Mae Ramirez, Isabel Zbukvic, Jorgen Gullestrup, Katherine McGill, Kylie King, Lakshmi Vijayakumar, Lauren White, Loraine Barnaby, Mark Sinyor, Marlena Sokół-Szawłowska, Maryke Van Zyl, Merike Sisask, Michael Phillips, Mohsen Rezaeian, Naohiro Yonemoto, Nathaniel Pollock, Nikhil Jain, Paul Siu Fai Yip, Ping Qin, Piotr Toczyski, Rakhi Dandona, Ricardo Gusmão, Samah Jabr, Sarah Spafford, Tae-Yeon Hwang, Thomas Niederkrotenthaler, Ulrich Hegerl, Vita Poštuvan, Yutaka Motohashi, Kairi Kõlves
{"title":"制定利用实施科学预防自杀的指南:一项国际德尔菲专家共识研究。","authors":"Sadhvi Krishnamoorthy, Gregory Armstrong, Victoria Ross, Lennart Reifels, Hayley Purdon, Jillian Francis, Jacinta Hawgood, Sharna Mathieu, Alexandr Kasal, Allison Crawford, Allison M Gustavson, András Székely, Anna Baran, Annette Erlangsen, Ashley Nemiro, Chez Curnow, Daniel Reidenberg, Daria Biechowska, Ella Arensman, Emmanuel Nii-Boye Quarshie, Fiona Shand, Caroline Mae Ramirez, Isabel Zbukvic, Jorgen Gullestrup, Katherine McGill, Kylie King, Lakshmi Vijayakumar, Lauren White, Loraine Barnaby, Mark Sinyor, Marlena Sokół-Szawłowska, Maryke Van Zyl, Merike Sisask, Michael Phillips, Mohsen Rezaeian, Naohiro Yonemoto, Nathaniel Pollock, Nikhil Jain, Paul Siu Fai Yip, Ping Qin, Piotr Toczyski, Rakhi Dandona, Ricardo Gusmão, Samah Jabr, Sarah Spafford, Tae-Yeon Hwang, Thomas Niederkrotenthaler, Ulrich Hegerl, Vita Poštuvan, Yutaka Motohashi, Kairi Kõlves","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2024-001206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Suicide research and prevention are complex. Many practical, methodological and ethical challenges must be overcome to implement effective suicide prevention interventions. Implementation science can offer insights into what works, why and in what context. Yet, there are limited real-world examples of the application of implementation science in suicide prevention. This study aimed to identify approaches to employ principles of implementation science to tackle important challenges in suicide prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire about promoting implementation science for suicide prevention was developed through thematic analysis of stakeholder narratives. Statements were categorised into six domains: research priorities, practical considerations, approach to intervention design and delivery, lived experience engagement, dissemination and the way forward. The questionnaire (n=52 statements-round 1; n=44 statements-round 2; n=9 statements-round 3) was administered electronically to a panel (n=62-round 1, n=48-round 2; n=45-round 3) of international experts (suicide researchers, leaders, project team members, lived experience advocates). Statements were rated on a Likert scale based on an understanding of importance and priority of each item. Statements endorsed by at least 85% of the panel would be included in the final guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-two of the 90 statements were endorsed. Recommendations included broadening research inquiries to understand overall programme impact; accounting for resources in the translation of evidence into practice; embedding implementation science in intervention delivery and design; meaningfully engaging lived experience; considering channels for dissemination of implementation-related findings and focusing on next steps needed to routinely harness the strengths of implementation science in suicide prevention research, practice and training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An interdisciplinary panel of suicide prevention experts reached a consensus on optimal strategies for using implementation science to enhance the effectiveness of policies and programmes aimed at reducing suicide.</p>","PeriodicalId":101362,"journal":{"name":"BMJ public health","volume":"3 1","pages":"e001206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12035435/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards development of guidelines for harnessing implementation science for suicide prevention: an international Delphi expert consensus study.\",\"authors\":\"Sadhvi Krishnamoorthy, Gregory Armstrong, Victoria Ross, Lennart Reifels, Hayley Purdon, Jillian Francis, Jacinta Hawgood, Sharna Mathieu, Alexandr Kasal, Allison Crawford, Allison M Gustavson, András Székely, Anna Baran, Annette Erlangsen, Ashley Nemiro, Chez Curnow, Daniel Reidenberg, Daria Biechowska, Ella Arensman, Emmanuel Nii-Boye Quarshie, Fiona Shand, Caroline Mae Ramirez, Isabel Zbukvic, Jorgen Gullestrup, Katherine McGill, Kylie King, Lakshmi Vijayakumar, Lauren White, Loraine Barnaby, Mark Sinyor, Marlena Sokół-Szawłowska, Maryke Van Zyl, Merike Sisask, Michael Phillips, Mohsen Rezaeian, Naohiro Yonemoto, Nathaniel Pollock, Nikhil Jain, Paul Siu Fai Yip, Ping Qin, Piotr Toczyski, Rakhi Dandona, Ricardo Gusmão, Samah Jabr, Sarah Spafford, Tae-Yeon Hwang, Thomas Niederkrotenthaler, Ulrich Hegerl, Vita Poštuvan, Yutaka Motohashi, Kairi Kõlves\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjph-2024-001206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Suicide research and prevention are complex. Many practical, methodological and ethical challenges must be overcome to implement effective suicide prevention interventions. Implementation science can offer insights into what works, why and in what context. Yet, there are limited real-world examples of the application of implementation science in suicide prevention. This study aimed to identify approaches to employ principles of implementation science to tackle important challenges in suicide prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire about promoting implementation science for suicide prevention was developed through thematic analysis of stakeholder narratives. Statements were categorised into six domains: research priorities, practical considerations, approach to intervention design and delivery, lived experience engagement, dissemination and the way forward. The questionnaire (n=52 statements-round 1; n=44 statements-round 2; n=9 statements-round 3) was administered electronically to a panel (n=62-round 1, n=48-round 2; n=45-round 3) of international experts (suicide researchers, leaders, project team members, lived experience advocates). Statements were rated on a Likert scale based on an understanding of importance and priority of each item. Statements endorsed by at least 85% of the panel would be included in the final guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-two of the 90 statements were endorsed. Recommendations included broadening research inquiries to understand overall programme impact; accounting for resources in the translation of evidence into practice; embedding implementation science in intervention delivery and design; meaningfully engaging lived experience; considering channels for dissemination of implementation-related findings and focusing on next steps needed to routinely harness the strengths of implementation science in suicide prevention research, practice and training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An interdisciplinary panel of suicide prevention experts reached a consensus on optimal strategies for using implementation science to enhance the effectiveness of policies and programmes aimed at reducing suicide.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ public health\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"e001206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12035435/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-001206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-001206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:自杀研究和预防是复杂的。要实施有效的自杀预防干预措施,必须克服许多实际的、方法上的和伦理上的挑战。实施科学可以提供关于什么有效、为什么有效以及在什么环境下有效的见解。然而,在现实世界中,将实施科学应用于自杀预防的例子有限。本研究旨在确定方法,运用实施科学的原则,以解决自杀预防的重要挑战。方法:通过对利益相关者叙事的专题分析,编制关于促进自杀预防实施科学的调查问卷。这些陈述被分为六个领域:研究重点、实际考虑、干预设计和实施的方法、生活体验参与、传播和前进的道路。问卷(n=52条陈述-第1轮;N =44条语句-第2轮;N =9个陈述(第3轮)以电子方式给予一个小组(N =62-第1轮,N =48-第2轮;N =45-第3轮)国际专家(自杀研究人员、领导者、项目团队成员、生活体验倡导者)。根据对每个项目的重要性和优先级的理解,用李克特量表对陈述进行评分。经至少85%的专家组成员认可的声明将被纳入最终的指导方针。结果:90项声明中有82项获得认可。建议包括扩大研究调查,以了解总体方案影响;将证据转化为实践的资源核算;将实施科学纳入干预措施的实施和设计;富有意义的生活体验;考虑传播与实施有关的调查结果的渠道,并侧重于在自杀预防研究、实践和培训中经常利用实施科学的优势所需的后续步骤。结论:一个跨学科的自杀预防专家小组就使用实施科学来提高旨在减少自杀的政策和方案的有效性的最佳策略达成了共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards development of guidelines for harnessing implementation science for suicide prevention: an international Delphi expert consensus study.

Objectives: Suicide research and prevention are complex. Many practical, methodological and ethical challenges must be overcome to implement effective suicide prevention interventions. Implementation science can offer insights into what works, why and in what context. Yet, there are limited real-world examples of the application of implementation science in suicide prevention. This study aimed to identify approaches to employ principles of implementation science to tackle important challenges in suicide prevention.

Methods: A questionnaire about promoting implementation science for suicide prevention was developed through thematic analysis of stakeholder narratives. Statements were categorised into six domains: research priorities, practical considerations, approach to intervention design and delivery, lived experience engagement, dissemination and the way forward. The questionnaire (n=52 statements-round 1; n=44 statements-round 2; n=9 statements-round 3) was administered electronically to a panel (n=62-round 1, n=48-round 2; n=45-round 3) of international experts (suicide researchers, leaders, project team members, lived experience advocates). Statements were rated on a Likert scale based on an understanding of importance and priority of each item. Statements endorsed by at least 85% of the panel would be included in the final guidelines.

Results: Eighty-two of the 90 statements were endorsed. Recommendations included broadening research inquiries to understand overall programme impact; accounting for resources in the translation of evidence into practice; embedding implementation science in intervention delivery and design; meaningfully engaging lived experience; considering channels for dissemination of implementation-related findings and focusing on next steps needed to routinely harness the strengths of implementation science in suicide prevention research, practice and training.

Conclusion: An interdisciplinary panel of suicide prevention experts reached a consensus on optimal strategies for using implementation science to enhance the effectiveness of policies and programmes aimed at reducing suicide.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信