先前PETTICOAT后慢性夹层的开孔/分支主动脉血管内修复

Gabor Fazekas, Petroula Nana, Jose I Torrealba, Thomas LE Houérou, Giuseppe Panuccio, Stephan Haulon, Tilo Kölbel
{"title":"先前PETTICOAT后慢性夹层的开孔/分支主动脉血管内修复","authors":"Gabor Fazekas, Petroula Nana, Jose I Torrealba, Thomas LE Houérou, Giuseppe Panuccio, Stephan Haulon, Tilo Kölbel","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.25.13310-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous PETTICOAT stents, applied in type B aortic dissections, may complicate subsequent fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair. This study presents the technical and clinical outcomes of f/bEVAR in chronic type A and B aortic dissections previously managed with PETTICOAT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This case series included patients from two aortic centers, with chronic dissections managed with f/bEVAR for thoracoabdominal aneurysms following PETTICOAT. The PROCESS guidelines were followed. Technical parameters and clinical outcomes were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight male patients were included (63 [54-74] years). Two were managed for type I, five for type II and one for type V thoracoabdominal aneurysms. Six custom-made (two fenestrated, three branched and one combined) and two off-the-shelf branched endografts were used. Technical success was 100%. Adjunctive target vessel related procedures were performed in six cases, including pre-catheterization of stenotic renal arteries due to overlapping PETTICOAT stents, dissection flap fenestration for target vessel catheterization, in-situ fenestration after accidental celiac artery occlusion, and ballon-assisted bridging stent advancement through the PETTICOAT stent-struts. Balloon-expandable or self-expanding covered stents reinforced with balloon-expandable bare metal stents were used. No death occurred within 30 days. Two early reinterventions were performed: one relining renal bridging stent compression between the PETTICOAT stent-struts and one renal branch coiling due to bleeding. Median follow-up was 21 months. No death, reintervention or target vessel instability was detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to the described experience, f/bEVAR may be successfully applied in patients with previous PETTICOAT by experienced hands. However, technical challenges, needing immediate intra-operative or early post-operative management, are frequent.</p>","PeriodicalId":101333,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"239-246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fenestrated/branched aortic endovascular repair of chronic dissections managed after previous PETTICOAT.\",\"authors\":\"Gabor Fazekas, Petroula Nana, Jose I Torrealba, Thomas LE Houérou, Giuseppe Panuccio, Stephan Haulon, Tilo Kölbel\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0021-9509.25.13310-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous PETTICOAT stents, applied in type B aortic dissections, may complicate subsequent fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair. This study presents the technical and clinical outcomes of f/bEVAR in chronic type A and B aortic dissections previously managed with PETTICOAT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This case series included patients from two aortic centers, with chronic dissections managed with f/bEVAR for thoracoabdominal aneurysms following PETTICOAT. The PROCESS guidelines were followed. Technical parameters and clinical outcomes were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight male patients were included (63 [54-74] years). Two were managed for type I, five for type II and one for type V thoracoabdominal aneurysms. Six custom-made (two fenestrated, three branched and one combined) and two off-the-shelf branched endografts were used. Technical success was 100%. Adjunctive target vessel related procedures were performed in six cases, including pre-catheterization of stenotic renal arteries due to overlapping PETTICOAT stents, dissection flap fenestration for target vessel catheterization, in-situ fenestration after accidental celiac artery occlusion, and ballon-assisted bridging stent advancement through the PETTICOAT stent-struts. Balloon-expandable or self-expanding covered stents reinforced with balloon-expandable bare metal stents were used. No death occurred within 30 days. Two early reinterventions were performed: one relining renal bridging stent compression between the PETTICOAT stent-struts and one renal branch coiling due to bleeding. Median follow-up was 21 months. No death, reintervention or target vessel instability was detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to the described experience, f/bEVAR may be successfully applied in patients with previous PETTICOAT by experienced hands. However, technical challenges, needing immediate intra-operative or early post-operative management, are frequent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"239-246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.25.13310-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.25.13310-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:先前应用于B型主动脉夹层的PETTICOAT支架可能使随后的开孔/分支血管内主动脉修复复杂化。本研究介绍了f/bEVAR治疗慢性A型和B型主动脉夹层的技术和临床结果。方法:本病例系列包括来自两个主动脉中心的患者,经f/bEVAR治疗胸腹动脉瘤。遵循PROCESS指南。评估技术参数和临床结果。结果:纳入8例男性患者,年龄63[54-74]岁。2例为I型胸腹动脉瘤,5例为II型胸腹动脉瘤,1例为V型胸腹动脉瘤。使用6个定制的(2个开孔,3个分支,1个组合)和2个现成的分支内移植物。技术上的成功率是100%。6例患者行辅助靶血管相关手术,包括因PETTICOAT支架重叠导致肾动脉狭窄的预置管、夹层皮瓣开窗进行靶血管插管、意外腹腔动脉闭塞后原位开窗、球囊辅助架桥支架通过PETTICOAT支架支柱推进。使用球囊可膨胀或自膨胀覆盖支架,并用球囊可膨胀裸金属支架加固。30天内未发生死亡。进行了两次早期再干预:一次是PETTICOAT支架支柱之间的肾桥支架压缩,一次是由于出血导致肾分支卷曲。中位随访时间为21个月。未发现死亡、再干预或靶血管不稳定。结论:根据所描述的经验,f/bEVAR可以成功地应用于既往PETTICOAT患者。然而,技术上的挑战,需要立即术中或术后早期处理,是经常发生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fenestrated/branched aortic endovascular repair of chronic dissections managed after previous PETTICOAT.

Background: Previous PETTICOAT stents, applied in type B aortic dissections, may complicate subsequent fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair. This study presents the technical and clinical outcomes of f/bEVAR in chronic type A and B aortic dissections previously managed with PETTICOAT.

Methods: This case series included patients from two aortic centers, with chronic dissections managed with f/bEVAR for thoracoabdominal aneurysms following PETTICOAT. The PROCESS guidelines were followed. Technical parameters and clinical outcomes were assessed.

Results: Eight male patients were included (63 [54-74] years). Two were managed for type I, five for type II and one for type V thoracoabdominal aneurysms. Six custom-made (two fenestrated, three branched and one combined) and two off-the-shelf branched endografts were used. Technical success was 100%. Adjunctive target vessel related procedures were performed in six cases, including pre-catheterization of stenotic renal arteries due to overlapping PETTICOAT stents, dissection flap fenestration for target vessel catheterization, in-situ fenestration after accidental celiac artery occlusion, and ballon-assisted bridging stent advancement through the PETTICOAT stent-struts. Balloon-expandable or self-expanding covered stents reinforced with balloon-expandable bare metal stents were used. No death occurred within 30 days. Two early reinterventions were performed: one relining renal bridging stent compression between the PETTICOAT stent-struts and one renal branch coiling due to bleeding. Median follow-up was 21 months. No death, reintervention or target vessel instability was detected.

Conclusions: According to the described experience, f/bEVAR may be successfully applied in patients with previous PETTICOAT by experienced hands. However, technical challenges, needing immediate intra-operative or early post-operative management, are frequent.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信