内限制膜剥离对黄斑脱离性视网膜脱离患者解剖和视觉结果的影响。

Q3 Medicine
Deniz Bağcı, Cumali Değirmenci, Filiz Afrashi
{"title":"内限制膜剥离对黄斑脱离性视网膜脱离患者解剖和视觉结果的影响。","authors":"Deniz Bağcı, Cumali Değirmenci, Filiz Afrashi","doi":"10.4274/tjo.galenos.2025.67847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the anatomical and visual outcomes of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in patients with macula-involving (\"macula-off\") retinal detachment treated with silicone oil endotamponade.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included 19 eyes of 19 patients (Group 1, ILM peeled) and 33 eyes of 32 patients (Group 2, ILM not peeled) who underwent surgery for macula-off retinal detachment at Ege University Department of Ophthalmology. All patients underwent detailed ophthalmological examination and macular optical coherence tomography preoperatively, at postoperative 1 month, and 1 month after silicone removal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 60.47±9.9 years in Group 1 and 57.56±10.63 years in Group 2. The average follow-up duration was 9.13±5.29 months. Preoperative visual acuity was 1.6±1.3 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in Group 1 and 1.1±0.8 logMAR in Group 2. At postoperative 1 month, visual acuity was 0.8±0.7 logMAR in Group 1 and 0.7±0.7 logMAR in Group 2 (p=0.1). At 1 month postoperatively, epiretinal membrane (ERM) development was not observed in Group 1, while 9 eyes in Group 2 developed ERM. Visual acuity after silicone removal was similar in both groups (p=0.2). Central foveal thickness (μm) and macular volumes (mm<sup>3</sup>) were comparable in both groups (p>0.05). Three eyes in Group 2 that developed ERM underwent surgery and their visual acuity improved.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ILM peeling during vitreoretinal surgery in cases of macula-off retinal detachment may be effective in preventing ERM formation, though it does not result in significant visual improvement. Further studies with longer follow-up and larger patient cohorts are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23373,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"55 2","pages":"82-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12035011/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling on Anatomical and Visual Outcomes in Patients with Macula-Off Retinal Detachment.\",\"authors\":\"Deniz Bağcı, Cumali Değirmenci, Filiz Afrashi\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/tjo.galenos.2025.67847\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the anatomical and visual outcomes of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in patients with macula-involving (\\\"macula-off\\\") retinal detachment treated with silicone oil endotamponade.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included 19 eyes of 19 patients (Group 1, ILM peeled) and 33 eyes of 32 patients (Group 2, ILM not peeled) who underwent surgery for macula-off retinal detachment at Ege University Department of Ophthalmology. All patients underwent detailed ophthalmological examination and macular optical coherence tomography preoperatively, at postoperative 1 month, and 1 month after silicone removal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 60.47±9.9 years in Group 1 and 57.56±10.63 years in Group 2. The average follow-up duration was 9.13±5.29 months. Preoperative visual acuity was 1.6±1.3 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in Group 1 and 1.1±0.8 logMAR in Group 2. At postoperative 1 month, visual acuity was 0.8±0.7 logMAR in Group 1 and 0.7±0.7 logMAR in Group 2 (p=0.1). At 1 month postoperatively, epiretinal membrane (ERM) development was not observed in Group 1, while 9 eyes in Group 2 developed ERM. Visual acuity after silicone removal was similar in both groups (p=0.2). Central foveal thickness (μm) and macular volumes (mm<sup>3</sup>) were comparable in both groups (p>0.05). Three eyes in Group 2 that developed ERM underwent surgery and their visual acuity improved.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ILM peeling during vitreoretinal surgery in cases of macula-off retinal detachment may be effective in preventing ERM formation, though it does not result in significant visual improvement. Further studies with longer follow-up and larger patient cohorts are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"55 2\",\"pages\":\"82-85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12035011/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2025.67847\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2025.67847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估硅油内压填塞治疗累及黄斑(“黄斑脱落”)视网膜脱离患者的内限制膜(ILM)剥离的解剖学和视觉效果。材料与方法:选取在埃格大学眼科行视网膜脱离黄斑手术的19例患者19眼(1组,ILM去皮)和32例患者33眼(2组,ILM未去皮)。所有患者术前、术后1个月和硅胶去除后1个月均进行了详细的眼科检查和黄斑光学相干断层扫描。结果:1组患者平均年龄60.47±9.9岁,2组患者平均年龄57.56±10.63岁。平均随访时间为9.13±5.29个月。术前视力1组为最小分辨角(logMAR) 1.6±1.3对数,2组为1.1±0.8对数。术后1个月,1组视力为0.8±0.7 logMAR, 2组视力为0.7±0.7 logMAR (p=0.1)。术后1个月,1组未见视网膜前膜(ERM)发育,2组有9只眼出现ERM。两组术后视力差异无统计学意义(p=0.2)。两组中央中央凹厚度(μm)和黄斑体积(mm3)具有可比性(p < 0.05)。第二组有3只眼发生ERM,术后视力改善。结论:在黄斑脱离性视网膜脱离的玻璃体视网膜手术过程中,尽管对视力没有明显的改善,但对防止ERM的形成可能是有效的。需要更长的随访时间和更大的患者队列进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling on Anatomical and Visual Outcomes in Patients with Macula-Off Retinal Detachment.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the anatomical and visual outcomes of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in patients with macula-involving ("macula-off") retinal detachment treated with silicone oil endotamponade.

Materials and methods: The study included 19 eyes of 19 patients (Group 1, ILM peeled) and 33 eyes of 32 patients (Group 2, ILM not peeled) who underwent surgery for macula-off retinal detachment at Ege University Department of Ophthalmology. All patients underwent detailed ophthalmological examination and macular optical coherence tomography preoperatively, at postoperative 1 month, and 1 month after silicone removal.

Results: The mean age was 60.47±9.9 years in Group 1 and 57.56±10.63 years in Group 2. The average follow-up duration was 9.13±5.29 months. Preoperative visual acuity was 1.6±1.3 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in Group 1 and 1.1±0.8 logMAR in Group 2. At postoperative 1 month, visual acuity was 0.8±0.7 logMAR in Group 1 and 0.7±0.7 logMAR in Group 2 (p=0.1). At 1 month postoperatively, epiretinal membrane (ERM) development was not observed in Group 1, while 9 eyes in Group 2 developed ERM. Visual acuity after silicone removal was similar in both groups (p=0.2). Central foveal thickness (μm) and macular volumes (mm3) were comparable in both groups (p>0.05). Three eyes in Group 2 that developed ERM underwent surgery and their visual acuity improved.

Conclusion: ILM peeling during vitreoretinal surgery in cases of macula-off retinal detachment may be effective in preventing ERM formation, though it does not result in significant visual improvement. Further studies with longer follow-up and larger patient cohorts are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology
Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology (TJO) is the only scientific periodical publication of the Turkish Ophthalmological Association and has been published since January 1929. In its early years, the journal was published in Turkish and French. Although there were temporary interruptions in the publication of the journal due to various challenges, the Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology has been published continually from 1971 to the present. The target audience includes specialists and physicians in training in ophthalmology in all relevant disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信