Sebastiaan W R Dalmeijer, Tom C T van Riet, Jean-Pierre T F Ho, Eddy A G Becking
{"title":"评估生殖器成形术:系统回顾和未来研究的路线图。","authors":"Sebastiaan W R Dalmeijer, Tom C T van Riet, Jean-Pierre T F Ho, Eddy A G Becking","doi":"10.3390/cmtr18010005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review examines the existing literature concerning the objective and subjective evaluations of osseous genioplasty outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted in databases including PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, yielding 2563 references, which were screened by two independent reviewers. We included 105 articles originating from 25 different countries. Data were systematically extracted, categorized, and documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Genioplasty was performed in 5218 patients, either independently (3560 cases) or in combination with other orthognathic procedures (1696 cases), with a predominant focus on female patients (64%). Objective evaluation primarily focused on surgical accuracy, relapse, and neurosensory disturbance, while subjective assessments were largely related to aesthetics and patient satisfaction. Despite significant advancements in three-dimensional surgical planning and assessment, the review highlights a lack of standardized methods for evaluating isolated genioplasty outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings emphasize the need for improved and validated instruments that specifically assess the functional and aesthetic results of genioplastic surgery. Future research should prioritize patient-centered prospective studies and the development of assessment tools to ensure more comprehensive and reliable outcome evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":"18 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11995826/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Genioplasty Procedures: A Systematic Review and Roadmap for Future Investigations.\",\"authors\":\"Sebastiaan W R Dalmeijer, Tom C T van Riet, Jean-Pierre T F Ho, Eddy A G Becking\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/cmtr18010005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review examines the existing literature concerning the objective and subjective evaluations of osseous genioplasty outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted in databases including PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, yielding 2563 references, which were screened by two independent reviewers. We included 105 articles originating from 25 different countries. Data were systematically extracted, categorized, and documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Genioplasty was performed in 5218 patients, either independently (3560 cases) or in combination with other orthognathic procedures (1696 cases), with a predominant focus on female patients (64%). Objective evaluation primarily focused on surgical accuracy, relapse, and neurosensory disturbance, while subjective assessments were largely related to aesthetics and patient satisfaction. Despite significant advancements in three-dimensional surgical planning and assessment, the review highlights a lack of standardized methods for evaluating isolated genioplasty outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings emphasize the need for improved and validated instruments that specifically assess the functional and aesthetic results of genioplastic surgery. Future research should prioritize patient-centered prospective studies and the development of assessment tools to ensure more comprehensive and reliable outcome evaluations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11995826/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/cmtr18010005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cmtr18010005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究设计:系统评价。目的:本系统综述了现有的关于骨缺损成形术结果的客观和主观评价的文献。方法:综合检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science等数据库,得到2563篇文献,由2位独立审稿人进行筛选。我们收录了来自25个不同国家的105篇文章。系统地提取、分类和记录数据。结果:5218例患者进行了Genioplasty,其中独立(3560例)或与其他正颌手术联合(1696例),主要集中在女性患者(64%)。客观评价主要关注手术准确性、复发和神经感觉障碍,而主观评价主要与美观和患者满意度有关。尽管在三维手术计划和评估方面取得了重大进展,但该综述强调缺乏评估孤立性生殖器成形术结果的标准化方法。结论:研究结果强调需要改进和验证的仪器,专门评估生殖整形手术的功能和美学结果。未来的研究应优先考虑以患者为中心的前瞻性研究和评估工具的开发,以确保更全面和可靠的结果评估。
Evaluating Genioplasty Procedures: A Systematic Review and Roadmap for Future Investigations.
Study design: Systematic review.
Objective: This systematic review examines the existing literature concerning the objective and subjective evaluations of osseous genioplasty outcomes.
Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in databases including PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, yielding 2563 references, which were screened by two independent reviewers. We included 105 articles originating from 25 different countries. Data were systematically extracted, categorized, and documented.
Results: Genioplasty was performed in 5218 patients, either independently (3560 cases) or in combination with other orthognathic procedures (1696 cases), with a predominant focus on female patients (64%). Objective evaluation primarily focused on surgical accuracy, relapse, and neurosensory disturbance, while subjective assessments were largely related to aesthetics and patient satisfaction. Despite significant advancements in three-dimensional surgical planning and assessment, the review highlights a lack of standardized methods for evaluating isolated genioplasty outcomes.
Conclusions: The findings emphasize the need for improved and validated instruments that specifically assess the functional and aesthetic results of genioplastic surgery. Future research should prioritize patient-centered prospective studies and the development of assessment tools to ensure more comprehensive and reliable outcome evaluations.