上肢柔韧性训练对慢性呼吸道疾病患者呼吸肌功能、上肢耐力和日常生活活动的影响——一项随机对照试验

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION
Mahadevi Patil, Prajakta Sahasrabudhe, Ashok Shyam, Parag Sancheti
{"title":"上肢柔韧性训练对慢性呼吸道疾病患者呼吸肌功能、上肢耐力和日常生活活动的影响——一项随机对照试验","authors":"Mahadevi Patil, Prajakta Sahasrabudhe, Ashok Shyam, Parag Sancheti","doi":"10.1002/pri.70058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Patients with chronic respiratory disease (CRD) often rely on neck muscles for breathing and contribute to poor posture, which alters the length-tension relationship and efficiency of these muscles. Upper body flexibility and good posture can potentiate pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) protocol. The present study aims to evaluate if the addition of upper body flexibility exercises to PR benefits patients in terms of respiratory muscle performance, upper limb endurance, and daily activities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study protocol was approved by the institutional ethical committee before the participant enrollment. Sixty individuals with a diagnosis of chronic respiratory disease were recruited and randomly allocated to a control and experimental group. The control group received a conventional PR protocol, whereas the experimental group received upper body flexibility exercises in addition to PR for 4 weeks. Respiratory muscle performance measured as maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax), upper limb endurance (6-Minute Pegboard and Rings Test), and activities of daily living (Barthel Index-Dyspnea) were assessed at baseline and after 4 weeks for both the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline values were similar for both groups. Group A had scores of 55.1 ± 6.19 for PImax and 372.0 ± 41.80 for the 6-Minute Pegboard and Rings Test, while Group B scored 57.7 ± 6.49 and 394.0 ± 36.99, respectively (p < 0.05), showing greater improvements in Group B. Both groups also showed similar improvements in the Barthel Index-Dyspnea, with Group A scoring 2.61 ± 1.87 and Group B scoring 2.86 ± 1.92 at the end of 4 weeks.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results of the study can be attributed to improved respiratory mechanics, muscle efficiency, and reduced perceived exertion during activities. Hence, respiratory physiotherapists should incorporate upper body flexibility training in PR for better outcomes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical trial registry India (CTRI/2023/09/057917).</p>","PeriodicalId":47243,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Research International","volume":"30 2","pages":"e70058"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Upper Body Flexibility Exercises on Respiratory Muscle Performance, Upper Limb Endurance and Activities of Daily Living in Patients With Chronic Respiratory Disease-A Randomized Control Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Mahadevi Patil, Prajakta Sahasrabudhe, Ashok Shyam, Parag Sancheti\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pri.70058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Patients with chronic respiratory disease (CRD) often rely on neck muscles for breathing and contribute to poor posture, which alters the length-tension relationship and efficiency of these muscles. Upper body flexibility and good posture can potentiate pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) protocol. The present study aims to evaluate if the addition of upper body flexibility exercises to PR benefits patients in terms of respiratory muscle performance, upper limb endurance, and daily activities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study protocol was approved by the institutional ethical committee before the participant enrollment. Sixty individuals with a diagnosis of chronic respiratory disease were recruited and randomly allocated to a control and experimental group. The control group received a conventional PR protocol, whereas the experimental group received upper body flexibility exercises in addition to PR for 4 weeks. Respiratory muscle performance measured as maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax), upper limb endurance (6-Minute Pegboard and Rings Test), and activities of daily living (Barthel Index-Dyspnea) were assessed at baseline and after 4 weeks for both the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline values were similar for both groups. Group A had scores of 55.1 ± 6.19 for PImax and 372.0 ± 41.80 for the 6-Minute Pegboard and Rings Test, while Group B scored 57.7 ± 6.49 and 394.0 ± 36.99, respectively (p < 0.05), showing greater improvements in Group B. Both groups also showed similar improvements in the Barthel Index-Dyspnea, with Group A scoring 2.61 ± 1.87 and Group B scoring 2.86 ± 1.92 at the end of 4 weeks.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results of the study can be attributed to improved respiratory mechanics, muscle efficiency, and reduced perceived exertion during activities. Hence, respiratory physiotherapists should incorporate upper body flexibility training in PR for better outcomes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical trial registry India (CTRI/2023/09/057917).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Research International\",\"volume\":\"30 2\",\"pages\":\"e70058\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Research International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.70058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.70058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:慢性呼吸系统疾病(CRD)患者经常依赖颈部肌肉进行呼吸,导致姿势不良,从而改变了颈部肌肉的长度-张力关系和效率。上半身的灵活性和良好的姿势可以促进肺部康复(PR)方案。本研究旨在评估在PR中增加上肢柔韧性锻炼是否对患者的呼吸肌功能、上肢耐力和日常活动有好处。方法:研究方案在受试者入组前经机构伦理委员会批准。60名诊断为慢性呼吸系统疾病的人被招募并随机分配到对照组和实验组。对照组接受常规PR方案,实验组在PR的基础上进行上肢柔韧性训练,为期4周。在基线和4周后对两组的呼吸肌性能进行评估,包括最大吸气压力(PImax)、上肢耐力(6分钟钉板和环测试)和日常生活活动(Barthel指数-呼吸困难)。结果:两组的基线值相似。A组的PImax评分为55.1±6.19分,6分钟钉板和环测试评分为372.0±41.80分,而B组的评分分别为57.7±6.49分和394.0±36.99分(p)。讨论:研究结果可归因于呼吸力学、肌肉效率的改善,以及活动时感知劳累的减少。因此,呼吸物理治疗师应该在PR中加入上肢柔韧性训练,以获得更好的效果。试验注册:印度临床试验注册中心(CTRI/2023/09/057917)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Upper Body Flexibility Exercises on Respiratory Muscle Performance, Upper Limb Endurance and Activities of Daily Living in Patients With Chronic Respiratory Disease-A Randomized Control Trial.

Background and purpose: Patients with chronic respiratory disease (CRD) often rely on neck muscles for breathing and contribute to poor posture, which alters the length-tension relationship and efficiency of these muscles. Upper body flexibility and good posture can potentiate pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) protocol. The present study aims to evaluate if the addition of upper body flexibility exercises to PR benefits patients in terms of respiratory muscle performance, upper limb endurance, and daily activities.

Methods: The study protocol was approved by the institutional ethical committee before the participant enrollment. Sixty individuals with a diagnosis of chronic respiratory disease were recruited and randomly allocated to a control and experimental group. The control group received a conventional PR protocol, whereas the experimental group received upper body flexibility exercises in addition to PR for 4 weeks. Respiratory muscle performance measured as maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax), upper limb endurance (6-Minute Pegboard and Rings Test), and activities of daily living (Barthel Index-Dyspnea) were assessed at baseline and after 4 weeks for both the groups.

Results: Baseline values were similar for both groups. Group A had scores of 55.1 ± 6.19 for PImax and 372.0 ± 41.80 for the 6-Minute Pegboard and Rings Test, while Group B scored 57.7 ± 6.49 and 394.0 ± 36.99, respectively (p < 0.05), showing greater improvements in Group B. Both groups also showed similar improvements in the Barthel Index-Dyspnea, with Group A scoring 2.61 ± 1.87 and Group B scoring 2.86 ± 1.92 at the end of 4 weeks.

Discussion: The results of the study can be attributed to improved respiratory mechanics, muscle efficiency, and reduced perceived exertion during activities. Hence, respiratory physiotherapists should incorporate upper body flexibility training in PR for better outcomes.

Trial registration: Clinical trial registry India (CTRI/2023/09/057917).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Physiotherapy Research International is an international peer reviewed journal dedicated to the exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to specialist areas of physiotherapy theory, practice, and research. Our aim is to promote a high level of scholarship and build on the current evidence base to inform the advancement of the physiotherapy profession. We publish original research on a wide range of topics e.g. Primary research testing new physiotherapy treatments; methodological research; measurement and outcome research and qualitative research of interest to researchers, clinicians and educators. Further, we aim to publish high quality papers that represent the range of cultures and settings where physiotherapy services are delivered. We attract a wide readership from physiotherapists and others working in diverse clinical and academic settings. We aim to promote an international debate amongst the profession about current best evidence based practice. Papers are directed primarily towards the physiotherapy profession, but can be relevant to a wide range of professional groups. The growth of interdisciplinary research is also key to our aims and scope, and we encourage relevant submissions from other professional groups. The journal actively encourages submissions which utilise a breadth of different methodologies and research designs to facilitate addressing key questions related to the physiotherapy practice. PRI seeks to encourage good quality topical debates on a range of relevant issues and promote critical reflection on decision making and implementation of physiotherapy interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信