亚太国家一线Atezolizumab联合贝伐单抗治疗肝细胞癌后全身治疗的真实世界研究

IF 11.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Liver Cancer Pub Date : 2024-08-20 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1159/000540969
Choong-Kun Lee, Changhoon Yoo, Jung Yong Hong, Se Jun Park, Jin Won Kim, David Wai Meng Tai, Hyeyeong Kim, Krittiya Korphaisarn, Suebpong Tanasanvimon, San-Chi Chen, Ju Won Kim, Ilhwan Kim, Moonho Kim, Joan Choo, Sang-Bo Oh, Ching-Tso Chen, Woo Kyun Bae, Hongsik Kim, Seok Jae Huh, Chia-Jui Yen, Sejung Park, Dong Ki Lee, Landon Long Chan, Beodeul Kang, Minsu Kang, Raghav Sundar, Hye Jin Choi, Stephen Lam Chan, Hong Jae Chon, Myung-Ah Lee
{"title":"亚太国家一线Atezolizumab联合贝伐单抗治疗肝细胞癌后全身治疗的真实世界研究","authors":"Choong-Kun Lee, Changhoon Yoo, Jung Yong Hong, Se Jun Park, Jin Won Kim, David Wai Meng Tai, Hyeyeong Kim, Krittiya Korphaisarn, Suebpong Tanasanvimon, San-Chi Chen, Ju Won Kim, Ilhwan Kim, Moonho Kim, Joan Choo, Sang-Bo Oh, Ching-Tso Chen, Woo Kyun Bae, Hongsik Kim, Seok Jae Huh, Chia-Jui Yen, Sejung Park, Dong Ki Lee, Landon Long Chan, Beodeul Kang, Minsu Kang, Raghav Sundar, Hye Jin Choi, Stephen Lam Chan, Hong Jae Chon, Myung-Ah Lee","doi":"10.1159/000540969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is a commonly used first-line regimen for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment owing to its superior outcomes compared to sorafenib. However, optimal subsequent treatment options for patients with HCC who progressed on first-line atezolizumab plus bevacizumab remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multinational, multi-institutional, retrospective study included patients with HCC from 22 centers in five Asia-Pacific countries who were treated with first-line atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, which was discontinued for any reason. The endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) according to patient characteristics and second-line regimens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between June 2016 and May 2023, 1,141 patients were treated with first-line atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, of whom 629 (55.1%) received subsequent treatment. Sorafenib and lenvatinib were the most commonly administered second-line regimens (53.9% and 25.6%, respectively). Overall, the median PFS and OS were 2.9 and 8.0 months, respectively. Lenvatinib had longer PFS (4.0 vs. 2.3 months) and OS (8.0 vs. 6.3 months) than sorafenib. Patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) (<i>n</i> = 50, 8.3%) showed PFS and OS of 5.4 and 12.6 months, respectively. Lower tumor burden and lenvatinib or TKI plus ICI use were associated with longer second-line PFS. Preserved liver function was associated with improved OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with HCC who progressed on first-line atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, sorafenib and lenvatinib were the most commonly used second-line regimens in Asia-Pacific countries, with lenvatinib resulting in longer OS than sorafenib. The second-line TKI plus ICI combination exhibited promising efficacy, suggesting the potential role of continuing ICIs beyond disease progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":18156,"journal":{"name":"Liver Cancer","volume":"14 2","pages":"127-141"},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12005689/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-World Study of Systemic Treatment after First-Line Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Asia-Pacific Countries.\",\"authors\":\"Choong-Kun Lee, Changhoon Yoo, Jung Yong Hong, Se Jun Park, Jin Won Kim, David Wai Meng Tai, Hyeyeong Kim, Krittiya Korphaisarn, Suebpong Tanasanvimon, San-Chi Chen, Ju Won Kim, Ilhwan Kim, Moonho Kim, Joan Choo, Sang-Bo Oh, Ching-Tso Chen, Woo Kyun Bae, Hongsik Kim, Seok Jae Huh, Chia-Jui Yen, Sejung Park, Dong Ki Lee, Landon Long Chan, Beodeul Kang, Minsu Kang, Raghav Sundar, Hye Jin Choi, Stephen Lam Chan, Hong Jae Chon, Myung-Ah Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000540969\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is a commonly used first-line regimen for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment owing to its superior outcomes compared to sorafenib. However, optimal subsequent treatment options for patients with HCC who progressed on first-line atezolizumab plus bevacizumab remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multinational, multi-institutional, retrospective study included patients with HCC from 22 centers in five Asia-Pacific countries who were treated with first-line atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, which was discontinued for any reason. The endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) according to patient characteristics and second-line regimens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between June 2016 and May 2023, 1,141 patients were treated with first-line atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, of whom 629 (55.1%) received subsequent treatment. Sorafenib and lenvatinib were the most commonly administered second-line regimens (53.9% and 25.6%, respectively). Overall, the median PFS and OS were 2.9 and 8.0 months, respectively. Lenvatinib had longer PFS (4.0 vs. 2.3 months) and OS (8.0 vs. 6.3 months) than sorafenib. Patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) (<i>n</i> = 50, 8.3%) showed PFS and OS of 5.4 and 12.6 months, respectively. Lower tumor burden and lenvatinib or TKI plus ICI use were associated with longer second-line PFS. Preserved liver function was associated with improved OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with HCC who progressed on first-line atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, sorafenib and lenvatinib were the most commonly used second-line regimens in Asia-Pacific countries, with lenvatinib resulting in longer OS than sorafenib. The second-line TKI plus ICI combination exhibited promising efficacy, suggesting the potential role of continuing ICIs beyond disease progression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Liver Cancer\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"127-141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12005689/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Liver Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540969\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540969","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与索拉非尼相比,Atezolizumab联合贝伐单抗是一种常用的一线治疗方案,用于晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)的治疗。然而,一线阿特唑单抗加贝伐单抗进展的HCC患者的最佳后续治疗方案仍不清楚。方法:这项跨国、多机构、回顾性研究纳入了来自5个亚太国家22个中心的HCC患者,这些患者接受一线阿特唑单抗加贝伐单抗治疗,因任何原因停用。终点包括根据患者特征和二线方案的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。结果:2016年6月至2023年5月,1141例患者接受了一线atezolizumab联合贝伐单抗治疗,其中629例(55.1%)接受了后续治疗。索拉非尼和lenvatinib是最常用的二线方案(分别为53.9%和25.6%)。总体而言,中位PFS和OS分别为2.9和8.0个月。Lenvatinib的PFS(4.0个月vs. 2.3个月)和OS(8.0个月vs. 6.3个月)比sorafenib更长。酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)联合免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗的患者(n = 50, 8.3%) PFS和OS分别为5.4和12.6个月。较低的肿瘤负荷和lenvatinib或TKI + ICI使用与较长的二线PFS相关。保留的肝功能与改善的OS相关。结论:在一线阿特唑单抗+贝伐单抗进展的HCC患者中,索拉非尼和lenvatinib是亚太国家最常用的二线方案,lenvatinib导致的OS比索拉非尼更长。二线TKI + ICI联合治疗显示出良好的疗效,表明持续的ICI在疾病进展之后可能发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-World Study of Systemic Treatment after First-Line Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Asia-Pacific Countries.

Introduction: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is a commonly used first-line regimen for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment owing to its superior outcomes compared to sorafenib. However, optimal subsequent treatment options for patients with HCC who progressed on first-line atezolizumab plus bevacizumab remain unclear.

Methods: This multinational, multi-institutional, retrospective study included patients with HCC from 22 centers in five Asia-Pacific countries who were treated with first-line atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, which was discontinued for any reason. The endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) according to patient characteristics and second-line regimens.

Results: Between June 2016 and May 2023, 1,141 patients were treated with first-line atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, of whom 629 (55.1%) received subsequent treatment. Sorafenib and lenvatinib were the most commonly administered second-line regimens (53.9% and 25.6%, respectively). Overall, the median PFS and OS were 2.9 and 8.0 months, respectively. Lenvatinib had longer PFS (4.0 vs. 2.3 months) and OS (8.0 vs. 6.3 months) than sorafenib. Patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) (n = 50, 8.3%) showed PFS and OS of 5.4 and 12.6 months, respectively. Lower tumor burden and lenvatinib or TKI plus ICI use were associated with longer second-line PFS. Preserved liver function was associated with improved OS.

Conclusions: In patients with HCC who progressed on first-line atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, sorafenib and lenvatinib were the most commonly used second-line regimens in Asia-Pacific countries, with lenvatinib resulting in longer OS than sorafenib. The second-line TKI plus ICI combination exhibited promising efficacy, suggesting the potential role of continuing ICIs beyond disease progression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Liver Cancer
Liver Cancer Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
7.20%
发文量
53
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Liver Cancer is a journal that serves the international community of researchers and clinicians by providing a platform for research results related to the causes, mechanisms, and therapy of liver cancer. It focuses on molecular carcinogenesis, prevention, surveillance, diagnosis, and treatment, including molecular targeted therapy. The journal publishes clinical and translational research in the field of liver cancer in both humans and experimental models. It publishes original and review articles and has an Impact Factor of 13.8. The journal is indexed and abstracted in various platforms including PubMed, PubMed Central, Web of Science, Science Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded, Google Scholar, DOAJ, Chemical Abstracts Service, Scopus, Embase, Pathway Studio, and WorldCat.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信