母乳与供体母乳对早产儿肠道微生物定植的影响:一项系统综述。

Microbiome research reports Pub Date : 2024-11-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.20517/mrr.2024.44
Jing Chen, Aranka J van Wesemael, Nerissa P Denswil, Hendrik J Niemarkt, Johannes B van Goudoever, Vanesa Muncan, Tim G J de Meij, Chris H P van den Akker
{"title":"母乳与供体母乳对早产儿肠道微生物定植的影响:一项系统综述。","authors":"Jing Chen, Aranka J van Wesemael, Nerissa P Denswil, Hendrik J Niemarkt, Johannes B van Goudoever, Vanesa Muncan, Tim G J de Meij, Chris H P van den Akker","doi":"10.20517/mrr.2024.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Nutritional intake in preterm infants is associated with short- and long-term outcomes. The favorable outcomes of preterm infants who predominantly receive their mother's own milk (MOM) are thought to be mediated partly through beneficial effects on the gut microbiome. When MOM is not available, donor human milk (DHM) is recommended as the best alternative. However, DHM is less effective in preventing adverse outcomes, which may be explained by compositional differences between MOM and DHM, resulting in different microbiome development. This systematic review focuses on the effects of predominant DHM <i>vs.</i> MOM feeding on the gut microbiota composition in preterm infants. <b>Methods:</b> A comprehensive search was conducted across MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Eight out of the 717 publications identified were included. Data on gut microbiota composition, alpha diversity, and taxonomic differences between DHM- and MOM-fed preterm infants were extracted and analyzed. <b>Results:</b> The microbiome composition was distinct between the two feeding groups. Alpha diversity measures were lower in DHM-fed infants, particularly when preterm formula (PF) was also provided. DHM-fed infants showed higher abundances of <i>Staphylococcaceae</i> and <i>Clostridiaceae</i>, and lower abundances of Bacteroidetes and <i>Bifidobacterium</i>. <b>Conclusion:</b> The observed gut microbiome differences in DHM-fed preterm infants have previously been linked to adverse health outcomes. This underlines the importance of increasing the awareness of MOM intake in preterm infants. Further studies should explore the mechanisms through which human milk affects health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94376,"journal":{"name":"Microbiome research reports","volume":"4 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11977380/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of mother's own milk <i>vs.</i> donor human milk on gut microbiota colonization in preterm infants: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Jing Chen, Aranka J van Wesemael, Nerissa P Denswil, Hendrik J Niemarkt, Johannes B van Goudoever, Vanesa Muncan, Tim G J de Meij, Chris H P van den Akker\",\"doi\":\"10.20517/mrr.2024.44\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Nutritional intake in preterm infants is associated with short- and long-term outcomes. The favorable outcomes of preterm infants who predominantly receive their mother's own milk (MOM) are thought to be mediated partly through beneficial effects on the gut microbiome. When MOM is not available, donor human milk (DHM) is recommended as the best alternative. However, DHM is less effective in preventing adverse outcomes, which may be explained by compositional differences between MOM and DHM, resulting in different microbiome development. This systematic review focuses on the effects of predominant DHM <i>vs.</i> MOM feeding on the gut microbiota composition in preterm infants. <b>Methods:</b> A comprehensive search was conducted across MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Eight out of the 717 publications identified were included. Data on gut microbiota composition, alpha diversity, and taxonomic differences between DHM- and MOM-fed preterm infants were extracted and analyzed. <b>Results:</b> The microbiome composition was distinct between the two feeding groups. Alpha diversity measures were lower in DHM-fed infants, particularly when preterm formula (PF) was also provided. DHM-fed infants showed higher abundances of <i>Staphylococcaceae</i> and <i>Clostridiaceae</i>, and lower abundances of Bacteroidetes and <i>Bifidobacterium</i>. <b>Conclusion:</b> The observed gut microbiome differences in DHM-fed preterm infants have previously been linked to adverse health outcomes. This underlines the importance of increasing the awareness of MOM intake in preterm infants. Further studies should explore the mechanisms through which human milk affects health outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbiome research reports\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11977380/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbiome research reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20517/mrr.2024.44\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiome research reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20517/mrr.2024.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:早产儿的营养摄入与短期和长期预后相关。早产儿主要接受母乳(MOM)的有利结果被认为部分是通过对肠道微生物组的有益影响来调节的。当没有母乳时,建议使用捐赠母乳(DHM)作为最佳选择。然而,DHM在预防不良后果方面效果较差,这可能是由于MOM和DHM的成分差异,导致微生物组发育不同。本系统综述的重点是优势DHM和MOM喂养对早产儿肠道微生物群组成的影响。方法:在MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane数据库中进行综合检索。所确定的717种出版物中有8种被列入。提取并分析了DHM和妈妈喂养的早产儿肠道微生物群组成、α多样性和分类学差异的数据。结果:两组仔猪微生物组成差异显著。在dhm喂养的婴儿中,α多样性测量值较低,特别是当还提供早产儿配方奶粉(PF)时。dhm喂养的婴儿葡萄球菌科和梭菌科的丰度较高,拟杆菌门和双歧杆菌的丰度较低。结论:在dhm喂养的早产儿中观察到的肠道微生物组差异先前与不良健康结果有关。这强调了在早产儿中提高MOM摄入量意识的重要性。进一步的研究应该探索母乳影响健康结果的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of mother's own milk vs. donor human milk on gut microbiota colonization in preterm infants: a systematic review.

Background: Nutritional intake in preterm infants is associated with short- and long-term outcomes. The favorable outcomes of preterm infants who predominantly receive their mother's own milk (MOM) are thought to be mediated partly through beneficial effects on the gut microbiome. When MOM is not available, donor human milk (DHM) is recommended as the best alternative. However, DHM is less effective in preventing adverse outcomes, which may be explained by compositional differences between MOM and DHM, resulting in different microbiome development. This systematic review focuses on the effects of predominant DHM vs. MOM feeding on the gut microbiota composition in preterm infants. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Eight out of the 717 publications identified were included. Data on gut microbiota composition, alpha diversity, and taxonomic differences between DHM- and MOM-fed preterm infants were extracted and analyzed. Results: The microbiome composition was distinct between the two feeding groups. Alpha diversity measures were lower in DHM-fed infants, particularly when preterm formula (PF) was also provided. DHM-fed infants showed higher abundances of Staphylococcaceae and Clostridiaceae, and lower abundances of Bacteroidetes and Bifidobacterium. Conclusion: The observed gut microbiome differences in DHM-fed preterm infants have previously been linked to adverse health outcomes. This underlines the importance of increasing the awareness of MOM intake in preterm infants. Further studies should explore the mechanisms through which human milk affects health outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信