腹腔镜结肠手术后早期出院监测:一项介入性研究。

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
L van Outersterp, S H H Laurijs, Y El Amraoui, A E Peeters, E E G Verdaasdonk
{"title":"腹腔镜结肠手术后早期出院监测:一项介入性研究。","authors":"L van Outersterp, S H H Laurijs, Y El Amraoui, A E Peeters, E E G Verdaasdonk","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-11716-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic colorectal surgery combined with Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) has improved patient outcomes by promoting faster recovery, reducing pain, and lowering the risk of complications. However, increasing demand on hospital capacity for clinical admissions and the shortage of healthcare professionals remains challenging. Home monitoring after surgical procedures and early discharge offers a potential solution. This study aims to assess the feasibility, safety and patient satisfaction with early discharge following elective colorectal surgery using continuous monitoring of vital signs and questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, single-centre, interventional study. Patients who meet the discharge criteria could leave on day one or two after surgery, monitored at home with sensors for vital signs and health questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 51 patients, 30 (58.8%) were discharged early. The results show successful early discharge in 80% (24 out of 30 patients) with a readmission rate of 20% of which 13.3% due to problems with the monitoring system. None of these readmissions were due to deviations in vital sign measurement at home. The patient satisfaction was high ranging between 6 and 7 (out of 7).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early discharge with continue monitoring is feasible for a selected group of colorectal surgery patients. No patients were readmitted because of serious complications. Further research should focus on expending the sample size and investigating the impact of early discharge without continuous monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"3654-3661"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monitoring early discharge after laparoscopic colon surgery: an interventional study.\",\"authors\":\"L van Outersterp, S H H Laurijs, Y El Amraoui, A E Peeters, E E G Verdaasdonk\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00464-025-11716-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic colorectal surgery combined with Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) has improved patient outcomes by promoting faster recovery, reducing pain, and lowering the risk of complications. However, increasing demand on hospital capacity for clinical admissions and the shortage of healthcare professionals remains challenging. Home monitoring after surgical procedures and early discharge offers a potential solution. This study aims to assess the feasibility, safety and patient satisfaction with early discharge following elective colorectal surgery using continuous monitoring of vital signs and questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, single-centre, interventional study. Patients who meet the discharge criteria could leave on day one or two after surgery, monitored at home with sensors for vital signs and health questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 51 patients, 30 (58.8%) were discharged early. The results show successful early discharge in 80% (24 out of 30 patients) with a readmission rate of 20% of which 13.3% due to problems with the monitoring system. None of these readmissions were due to deviations in vital sign measurement at home. The patient satisfaction was high ranging between 6 and 7 (out of 7).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early discharge with continue monitoring is feasible for a selected group of colorectal surgery patients. No patients were readmitted because of serious complications. Further research should focus on expending the sample size and investigating the impact of early discharge without continuous monitoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3654-3661\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11716-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11716-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹腔镜结直肠手术联合术后增强恢复(ERAS)通过促进更快的恢复、减轻疼痛和降低并发症的风险,改善了患者的预后。然而,对医院临床收治能力的需求不断增加以及医疗保健专业人员的短缺仍然具有挑战性。外科手术和早期出院后的家庭监测提供了一个潜在的解决方案。本研究旨在通过持续监测生命体征和问卷调查,评估择期结直肠手术后早期出院的可行性、安全性和患者满意度。方法:前瞻性、单中心、干预性研究。符合出院标准的患者可以在手术后的第一天或第二天出院,在家里用传感器监测生命体征和健康问卷。结果:51例患者中,30例(58.8%)提前出院。结果显示,80%的患者(30例患者中有24例)成功早期出院,20%的患者再入院,其中13.3%是由于监测系统的问题。这些再入院都不是由于家中生命体征测量的偏差。患者满意度在6 - 7之间(满分7分)。结论:对于选择的结直肠手术患者,早期出院并持续监测是可行的。无患者因严重并发症再次入院。进一步的研究应侧重于扩大样本量和调查未持续监测的早期出院的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Monitoring early discharge after laparoscopic colon surgery: an interventional study.

Background: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery combined with Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) has improved patient outcomes by promoting faster recovery, reducing pain, and lowering the risk of complications. However, increasing demand on hospital capacity for clinical admissions and the shortage of healthcare professionals remains challenging. Home monitoring after surgical procedures and early discharge offers a potential solution. This study aims to assess the feasibility, safety and patient satisfaction with early discharge following elective colorectal surgery using continuous monitoring of vital signs and questionnaires.

Methods: A prospective, single-centre, interventional study. Patients who meet the discharge criteria could leave on day one or two after surgery, monitored at home with sensors for vital signs and health questionnaires.

Results: Of 51 patients, 30 (58.8%) were discharged early. The results show successful early discharge in 80% (24 out of 30 patients) with a readmission rate of 20% of which 13.3% due to problems with the monitoring system. None of these readmissions were due to deviations in vital sign measurement at home. The patient satisfaction was high ranging between 6 and 7 (out of 7).

Conclusion: Early discharge with continue monitoring is feasible for a selected group of colorectal surgery patients. No patients were readmitted because of serious complications. Further research should focus on expending the sample size and investigating the impact of early discharge without continuous monitoring.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信