意大利Mosunetuzumab与Tisagenlecleucel治疗三线或高线(3L+)复发或难治性(R/R)滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)的成本-效果分析

IF 2.1 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2025-04-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CEOR.S509907
Stefano Luminari, Antonio Pinto, Benedetta Puccini, Alessandro D'Arpino, Emanuela Omodeo Salè, Marco Bellone, Lorenzo Pradelli, Alice Sabinot
{"title":"意大利Mosunetuzumab与Tisagenlecleucel治疗三线或高线(3L+)复发或难治性(R/R)滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)的成本-效果分析","authors":"Stefano Luminari, Antonio Pinto, Benedetta Puccini, Alessandro D'Arpino, Emanuela Omodeo Salè, Marco Bellone, Lorenzo Pradelli, Alice Sabinot","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S509907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the cost-effectiveness of mosunetuzumab with tisagenlecleucel for treating patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (R/R FL 3L+) from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service (NHS).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The analysis employs a weekly cycle partitioned survival model (PSM) with a lifetime horizon. The PSM model tracks patient outcomes based on time-to-event data, including progression-free survival (PFS) and post-progression survival (PPS). A matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparison (MAIC) approach was used to account for differences in trial population characteristics on the relative efficacy of mosunetuzumab to tisagenlecleucel. PFS and overall survival (OS) were extrapolated beyond the trial period by applying the hazard ratios from the MAIC to mosunetuzumab's parametric survival curves. Utility values and patient data are retrieved from the GO29781 trial. Economic inputs, from the perspective of the Italian NHS, include direct medical costs such as drugs, administration, monitoring, adverse event (AE) management, therapy following FL progression. Discontinuation and terminal care costs were also considered. Probabilistic sensitivity (PSA) and scenario analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mosunetuzumab was found to be dominant compared to tisagenlecleucel, resulting in an increase of 0.98 life years (LYs) and 0.70 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), while also being associated with lower overall costs. The sensitivity analysis consistently favored mosunetuzumab, with 94% of simulations demonstrating its cost-effectiveness based on the Italian WTP threshold of €40,000/QALY. Even in a scenario where tisagenlecleucel maintained a PFS advantage with assumed equivalence in OS, mosunetuzumab still showed a favorable cost-saving profile due to its lower incremental costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the Italian setting, mosunetuzumab is a cost-effective treatment option compared to tisagenlecleucel for adult patients with R/R 3L+ FL, presenting favourable outcomes from the perspective of the NHS. Future research and data collection efforts are crucial to validate these findings and reduce uncertainties regarding long-term clinical and economic implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"335-348"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12009579/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Mosunetuzumab vs Tisagenlecleucel for Treatment of Third- or Higher-Line (3L+) Relapsed or Refractory (R/R) Follicular Lymphoma (FL) in Italy.\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Luminari, Antonio Pinto, Benedetta Puccini, Alessandro D'Arpino, Emanuela Omodeo Salè, Marco Bellone, Lorenzo Pradelli, Alice Sabinot\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CEOR.S509907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the cost-effectiveness of mosunetuzumab with tisagenlecleucel for treating patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (R/R FL 3L+) from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service (NHS).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The analysis employs a weekly cycle partitioned survival model (PSM) with a lifetime horizon. The PSM model tracks patient outcomes based on time-to-event data, including progression-free survival (PFS) and post-progression survival (PPS). A matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparison (MAIC) approach was used to account for differences in trial population characteristics on the relative efficacy of mosunetuzumab to tisagenlecleucel. PFS and overall survival (OS) were extrapolated beyond the trial period by applying the hazard ratios from the MAIC to mosunetuzumab's parametric survival curves. Utility values and patient data are retrieved from the GO29781 trial. Economic inputs, from the perspective of the Italian NHS, include direct medical costs such as drugs, administration, monitoring, adverse event (AE) management, therapy following FL progression. Discontinuation and terminal care costs were also considered. Probabilistic sensitivity (PSA) and scenario analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mosunetuzumab was found to be dominant compared to tisagenlecleucel, resulting in an increase of 0.98 life years (LYs) and 0.70 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), while also being associated with lower overall costs. The sensitivity analysis consistently favored mosunetuzumab, with 94% of simulations demonstrating its cost-effectiveness based on the Italian WTP threshold of €40,000/QALY. Even in a scenario where tisagenlecleucel maintained a PFS advantage with assumed equivalence in OS, mosunetuzumab still showed a favorable cost-saving profile due to its lower incremental costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the Italian setting, mosunetuzumab is a cost-effective treatment option compared to tisagenlecleucel for adult patients with R/R 3L+ FL, presenting favourable outcomes from the perspective of the NHS. Future research and data collection efforts are crucial to validate these findings and reduce uncertainties regarding long-term clinical and economic implications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"335-348\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12009579/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S509907\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S509907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:从意大利国家卫生服务(NHS)的角度比较mosunetuzumab与tisagenlecleucel治疗复发或难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤(R/R FL 3L+)患者的成本-效果。患者和方法:分析采用每周周期分区生存模型(PSM)与生命周期。PSM模型基于事件时间数据跟踪患者结果,包括无进展生存期(PFS)和进展后生存期(PPS)。采用匹配调整间接治疗比较(MAIC)方法来解释mosunetuzumab对tisagenlecleucel相对疗效的试验人群特征差异。通过将MAIC的风险比应用于mosunetuzumab的参数生存曲线,推断试验期间后的PFS和总生存期(OS)。效用值和患者数据从GO29781试验中检索。从意大利NHS的角度来看,经济投入包括直接医疗费用,如药物、管理、监测、不良事件(AE)管理、FL进展后的治疗。还考虑了中止治疗和临终护理费用。进行了概率敏感性(PSA)和情景分析。结果:与tisagenlecleucel相比,Mosunetuzumab被发现具有优势,导致0.98生命年(LYs)和0.70质量调整生命年(QALYs)的增加,同时也与较低的总成本相关。敏感性分析一致支持mosunetuzumab, 94%的模拟显示其基于意大利WTP阈值€40,000/QALY的成本效益。即使在tisagenlecleucel维持PFS优势与假定OS等效的情况下,由于增量成本较低,mosunetuzumab仍然显示出有利的成本节约情况。结论:在意大利,与tisagenlecleucel相比,mosunetuzumab对于R/R 3L+ FL的成人患者是一种具有成本效益的治疗选择,从NHS的角度来看,呈现出良好的结果。未来的研究和数据收集工作对于验证这些发现和减少长期临床和经济影响的不确定性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Mosunetuzumab vs Tisagenlecleucel for Treatment of Third- or Higher-Line (3L+) Relapsed or Refractory (R/R) Follicular Lymphoma (FL) in Italy.

Purpose: To compare the cost-effectiveness of mosunetuzumab with tisagenlecleucel for treating patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (R/R FL 3L+) from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service (NHS).

Patients and methods: The analysis employs a weekly cycle partitioned survival model (PSM) with a lifetime horizon. The PSM model tracks patient outcomes based on time-to-event data, including progression-free survival (PFS) and post-progression survival (PPS). A matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparison (MAIC) approach was used to account for differences in trial population characteristics on the relative efficacy of mosunetuzumab to tisagenlecleucel. PFS and overall survival (OS) were extrapolated beyond the trial period by applying the hazard ratios from the MAIC to mosunetuzumab's parametric survival curves. Utility values and patient data are retrieved from the GO29781 trial. Economic inputs, from the perspective of the Italian NHS, include direct medical costs such as drugs, administration, monitoring, adverse event (AE) management, therapy following FL progression. Discontinuation and terminal care costs were also considered. Probabilistic sensitivity (PSA) and scenario analyses were conducted.

Results: Mosunetuzumab was found to be dominant compared to tisagenlecleucel, resulting in an increase of 0.98 life years (LYs) and 0.70 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), while also being associated with lower overall costs. The sensitivity analysis consistently favored mosunetuzumab, with 94% of simulations demonstrating its cost-effectiveness based on the Italian WTP threshold of €40,000/QALY. Even in a scenario where tisagenlecleucel maintained a PFS advantage with assumed equivalence in OS, mosunetuzumab still showed a favorable cost-saving profile due to its lower incremental costs.

Conclusion: In the Italian setting, mosunetuzumab is a cost-effective treatment option compared to tisagenlecleucel for adult patients with R/R 3L+ FL, presenting favourable outcomes from the perspective of the NHS. Future research and data collection efforts are crucial to validate these findings and reduce uncertainties regarding long-term clinical and economic implications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信