循环树脂在病毒清除研究中的回顾性评价-多公司合作- ICH Q5A(R2)后审查。

Q3 Medicine
Jennifer Anderson, Chelsea Burgwin, Donna Hamilton
{"title":"循环树脂在病毒清除研究中的回顾性评价-多公司合作- ICH Q5A(R2)后审查。","authors":"Jennifer Anderson, Chelsea Burgwin, Donna Hamilton","doi":"10.5731/pdajpst.2024-003024.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2019, the <i>BioPhorum Development Group Viral Clearance Workstream</i> performed a collaborative retrospective analysis to evaluate packed bed chromatographic resin performance after repeated cycling for two commonly used chromatography steps in biopharmaceutical manufacturing: protein A and anion exchange. Key variables evaluated in the assessment included virus type, resin type, number of reuse cycles, and virus challenge.This paper has been amended to include additional commentary on the ICH Q5A revision adopted in November 2023. In this retrospective analysis of viral clearance data on naïve versus cycled resin, powered by the availability of decades' worth of accumulated industry data, clearance capability was not negatively impacted by resin cycling. This finding is consistent with publications showing that surrogates for viral clearance capabilities could be employed in lieu of testing of viral clearance of cycled resins for protein A and anion exchange chromatography. The rigorous analysis of the retrospective data supports the view that viral clearance studies for cycled protein A and anion exchange resins are not necessary, provided that appropriate cleaning methods are applied during repeated use of chromatography columns. In agreement with this paper, ICH Q5A(R2) acknowledges that used resin studies are not required for Protein A. Used resin evaluation is still required for other chromatography steps; however, with appropriate justification, prior knowledge may be used in place of product-specific studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19986,"journal":{"name":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective Evaluation of Cycled Resin in Viral Clearance Studies - A Multiple Company Collaboration - Post ICH Q5A(R2) Review.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Anderson, Chelsea Burgwin, Donna Hamilton\",\"doi\":\"10.5731/pdajpst.2024-003024.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In 2019, the <i>BioPhorum Development Group Viral Clearance Workstream</i> performed a collaborative retrospective analysis to evaluate packed bed chromatographic resin performance after repeated cycling for two commonly used chromatography steps in biopharmaceutical manufacturing: protein A and anion exchange. Key variables evaluated in the assessment included virus type, resin type, number of reuse cycles, and virus challenge.This paper has been amended to include additional commentary on the ICH Q5A revision adopted in November 2023. In this retrospective analysis of viral clearance data on naïve versus cycled resin, powered by the availability of decades' worth of accumulated industry data, clearance capability was not negatively impacted by resin cycling. This finding is consistent with publications showing that surrogates for viral clearance capabilities could be employed in lieu of testing of viral clearance of cycled resins for protein A and anion exchange chromatography. The rigorous analysis of the retrospective data supports the view that viral clearance studies for cycled protein A and anion exchange resins are not necessary, provided that appropriate cleaning methods are applied during repeated use of chromatography columns. In agreement with this paper, ICH Q5A(R2) acknowledges that used resin studies are not required for Protein A. Used resin evaluation is still required for other chromatography steps; however, with appropriate justification, prior knowledge may be used in place of product-specific studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2024-003024.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2024-003024.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019年,BioPhorum开发集团病毒清除工作流程进行了一项协作回顾性分析,以评估生物制药制造中两种常用色谱步骤(蛋白质a和阴离子交换)反复循环后填充床色谱树脂的性能。评估中评估的关键变量包括病毒类型、树脂类型、重用周期数和病毒挑战。本文已被修订,包括对2023年11月通过的ICH Q5A修订的额外评论。通过对naïve与循环树脂的病毒清除数据的回顾性分析,通过几十年积累的行业数据,树脂循环对病毒清除能力没有负面影响。这一发现与出版物一致,表明病毒清除能力的替代品可以用来代替蛋白质A和阴离子交换色谱的循环树脂的病毒清除测试。回顾性数据的严格分析支持这样一种观点,即如果在重复使用色谱柱时采用适当的清洗方法,则无需对循环蛋白A和阴离子交换树脂进行病毒清除研究。与本文一致,ICH Q5A(R2)承认不需要对蛋白a进行用过的树脂研究。其他色谱步骤仍需要用过的树脂评价;但是,如果有适当的理由,可以使用先验知识代替特定产品的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retrospective Evaluation of Cycled Resin in Viral Clearance Studies - A Multiple Company Collaboration - Post ICH Q5A(R2) Review.

In 2019, the BioPhorum Development Group Viral Clearance Workstream performed a collaborative retrospective analysis to evaluate packed bed chromatographic resin performance after repeated cycling for two commonly used chromatography steps in biopharmaceutical manufacturing: protein A and anion exchange. Key variables evaluated in the assessment included virus type, resin type, number of reuse cycles, and virus challenge.This paper has been amended to include additional commentary on the ICH Q5A revision adopted in November 2023. In this retrospective analysis of viral clearance data on naïve versus cycled resin, powered by the availability of decades' worth of accumulated industry data, clearance capability was not negatively impacted by resin cycling. This finding is consistent with publications showing that surrogates for viral clearance capabilities could be employed in lieu of testing of viral clearance of cycled resins for protein A and anion exchange chromatography. The rigorous analysis of the retrospective data supports the view that viral clearance studies for cycled protein A and anion exchange resins are not necessary, provided that appropriate cleaning methods are applied during repeated use of chromatography columns. In agreement with this paper, ICH Q5A(R2) acknowledges that used resin studies are not required for Protein A. Used resin evaluation is still required for other chromatography steps; however, with appropriate justification, prior knowledge may be used in place of product-specific studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信