Jennifer Anderson, Chelsea Burgwin, Donna Hamilton
{"title":"循环树脂在病毒清除研究中的回顾性评价-多公司合作- ICH Q5A(R2)后审查。","authors":"Jennifer Anderson, Chelsea Burgwin, Donna Hamilton","doi":"10.5731/pdajpst.2024-003024.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2019, the <i>BioPhorum Development Group Viral Clearance Workstream</i> performed a collaborative retrospective analysis to evaluate packed bed chromatographic resin performance after repeated cycling for two commonly used chromatography steps in biopharmaceutical manufacturing: protein A and anion exchange. Key variables evaluated in the assessment included virus type, resin type, number of reuse cycles, and virus challenge.This paper has been amended to include additional commentary on the ICH Q5A revision adopted in November 2023. In this retrospective analysis of viral clearance data on naïve versus cycled resin, powered by the availability of decades' worth of accumulated industry data, clearance capability was not negatively impacted by resin cycling. This finding is consistent with publications showing that surrogates for viral clearance capabilities could be employed in lieu of testing of viral clearance of cycled resins for protein A and anion exchange chromatography. The rigorous analysis of the retrospective data supports the view that viral clearance studies for cycled protein A and anion exchange resins are not necessary, provided that appropriate cleaning methods are applied during repeated use of chromatography columns. In agreement with this paper, ICH Q5A(R2) acknowledges that used resin studies are not required for Protein A. Used resin evaluation is still required for other chromatography steps; however, with appropriate justification, prior knowledge may be used in place of product-specific studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19986,"journal":{"name":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective Evaluation of Cycled Resin in Viral Clearance Studies - A Multiple Company Collaboration - Post ICH Q5A(R2) Review.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Anderson, Chelsea Burgwin, Donna Hamilton\",\"doi\":\"10.5731/pdajpst.2024-003024.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In 2019, the <i>BioPhorum Development Group Viral Clearance Workstream</i> performed a collaborative retrospective analysis to evaluate packed bed chromatographic resin performance after repeated cycling for two commonly used chromatography steps in biopharmaceutical manufacturing: protein A and anion exchange. Key variables evaluated in the assessment included virus type, resin type, number of reuse cycles, and virus challenge.This paper has been amended to include additional commentary on the ICH Q5A revision adopted in November 2023. In this retrospective analysis of viral clearance data on naïve versus cycled resin, powered by the availability of decades' worth of accumulated industry data, clearance capability was not negatively impacted by resin cycling. This finding is consistent with publications showing that surrogates for viral clearance capabilities could be employed in lieu of testing of viral clearance of cycled resins for protein A and anion exchange chromatography. The rigorous analysis of the retrospective data supports the view that viral clearance studies for cycled protein A and anion exchange resins are not necessary, provided that appropriate cleaning methods are applied during repeated use of chromatography columns. In agreement with this paper, ICH Q5A(R2) acknowledges that used resin studies are not required for Protein A. Used resin evaluation is still required for other chromatography steps; however, with appropriate justification, prior knowledge may be used in place of product-specific studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2024-003024.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2024-003024.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Retrospective Evaluation of Cycled Resin in Viral Clearance Studies - A Multiple Company Collaboration - Post ICH Q5A(R2) Review.
In 2019, the BioPhorum Development Group Viral Clearance Workstream performed a collaborative retrospective analysis to evaluate packed bed chromatographic resin performance after repeated cycling for two commonly used chromatography steps in biopharmaceutical manufacturing: protein A and anion exchange. Key variables evaluated in the assessment included virus type, resin type, number of reuse cycles, and virus challenge.This paper has been amended to include additional commentary on the ICH Q5A revision adopted in November 2023. In this retrospective analysis of viral clearance data on naïve versus cycled resin, powered by the availability of decades' worth of accumulated industry data, clearance capability was not negatively impacted by resin cycling. This finding is consistent with publications showing that surrogates for viral clearance capabilities could be employed in lieu of testing of viral clearance of cycled resins for protein A and anion exchange chromatography. The rigorous analysis of the retrospective data supports the view that viral clearance studies for cycled protein A and anion exchange resins are not necessary, provided that appropriate cleaning methods are applied during repeated use of chromatography columns. In agreement with this paper, ICH Q5A(R2) acknowledges that used resin studies are not required for Protein A. Used resin evaluation is still required for other chromatography steps; however, with appropriate justification, prior knowledge may be used in place of product-specific studies.