癌症幸存者的饮食有多健康?风险最大的特点和改进的机会。

IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Harleen Kaur, Maria Pisu, Dori W Pekmezi, Laura Q Rogers, Michelle Y Martin, Kevin R Fontaine, Kaitlyn J Waugaman, Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
{"title":"癌症幸存者的饮食有多健康?风险最大的特点和改进的机会。","authors":"Harleen Kaur, Maria Pisu, Dori W Pekmezi, Laura Q Rogers, Michelle Y Martin, Kevin R Fontaine, Kaitlyn J Waugaman, Wendy Demark-Wahnefried","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2025.7012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diet quality and adherence to dietary guidelines are strong predictors of positive cancer outcomes among survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using 2-day dietary recalls from a nationwide sample of 818 survivors of 9 obesity-related cancers with ≥70% 5-year survival who expressed interest in a web-based diet and exercise trial. Total diet quality scores and component subscores were generated using the Health Eating Index-2020 (HEI-2020). Subgroup analyses examined differences by cancer diagnosis and treatment, body weight status, and sociodemographic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean [SD] HEI-2020 score among survivors was 51.6 [12.05] out of 100-approximately 10 points below norms for comparably aged Americans in the general population. Clinically meaningful deficits were observed for intakes of fruits, vegetables, dairy products, and protein (especially from plant and seafood sources). Survivors' intakes also included excessive amounts of refined grains. Compared with the general population, however, survivors' intakes more closely aligned with guidelines in terms of higher whole grain intake and lower consumption of sodium, saturated fat, and sugar (including sugar-sweetened beverages). Overall diet quality and/or component scores were significantly lower among younger survivors (age <65 years) and those within 5 years of diagnosis, with obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2), of lower education (high school diploma or less), and residing in areas of higher socioeconomic deprivation (Area Deprivation Index ≥50th percentile) (all P<.05). No significant subgroup differences were detected by cancer type or treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diet quality among survivors of obesity-related cancers is notably suboptimal. Clinicians should leverage survivors' interest in diet and exercise interventions to provide support and referrals targeting identified areas of need, particularly for those at highest risk, such as individuals with obesity, within 5 years of diagnosis, aged <65 years, with a high school diploma or less, and residing in areas of higher socioeconomic deprivation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Healthy Are the Diets of Cancer Survivors? Characteristics of Those Most at Risk and Opportunities for Improvement.\",\"authors\":\"Harleen Kaur, Maria Pisu, Dori W Pekmezi, Laura Q Rogers, Michelle Y Martin, Kevin R Fontaine, Kaitlyn J Waugaman, Wendy Demark-Wahnefried\",\"doi\":\"10.6004/jnccn.2025.7012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diet quality and adherence to dietary guidelines are strong predictors of positive cancer outcomes among survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using 2-day dietary recalls from a nationwide sample of 818 survivors of 9 obesity-related cancers with ≥70% 5-year survival who expressed interest in a web-based diet and exercise trial. Total diet quality scores and component subscores were generated using the Health Eating Index-2020 (HEI-2020). Subgroup analyses examined differences by cancer diagnosis and treatment, body weight status, and sociodemographic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean [SD] HEI-2020 score among survivors was 51.6 [12.05] out of 100-approximately 10 points below norms for comparably aged Americans in the general population. Clinically meaningful deficits were observed for intakes of fruits, vegetables, dairy products, and protein (especially from plant and seafood sources). Survivors' intakes also included excessive amounts of refined grains. Compared with the general population, however, survivors' intakes more closely aligned with guidelines in terms of higher whole grain intake and lower consumption of sodium, saturated fat, and sugar (including sugar-sweetened beverages). Overall diet quality and/or component scores were significantly lower among younger survivors (age <65 years) and those within 5 years of diagnosis, with obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2), of lower education (high school diploma or less), and residing in areas of higher socioeconomic deprivation (Area Deprivation Index ≥50th percentile) (all P<.05). No significant subgroup differences were detected by cancer type or treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diet quality among survivors of obesity-related cancers is notably suboptimal. Clinicians should leverage survivors' interest in diet and exercise interventions to provide support and referrals targeting identified areas of need, particularly for those at highest risk, such as individuals with obesity, within 5 years of diagnosis, aged <65 years, with a high school diploma or less, and residing in areas of higher socioeconomic deprivation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2025.7012\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2025.7012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:饮食质量和对饮食指南的遵守是幸存者癌症预后阳性的有力预测因素。方法:对全国818例5年生存率≥70%的9种肥胖相关癌症患者进行为期2天的饮食回顾分析,这些患者对基于网络的饮食和运动试验感兴趣。使用健康饮食指数-2020 (HEI-2020)生成总饮食质量评分和组成子评分。亚组分析检查了癌症诊断和治疗、体重状况和社会人口因素的差异。结果:幸存者的平均[SD] HEI-2020评分为51.6[12.05](满分为100分)——大约比一般人群中同等年龄的美国人的标准低10分。在水果、蔬菜、乳制品和蛋白质(尤其是植物和海鲜来源)的摄入中观察到有临床意义的缺陷。幸存者的摄入量还包括过量的精制谷物。然而,与一般人群相比,幸存者的摄入量更符合指南,即摄入更多的全谷物,摄入更少的钠、饱和脂肪和糖(包括含糖饮料)。总体饮食质量和/或成分评分在年轻幸存者中明显较低(年龄)。结论:肥胖相关癌症幸存者的饮食质量明显不理想。临床医生应该利用幸存者对饮食和运动干预的兴趣,针对确定的需求领域提供支持和转诊,特别是对那些风险最高的人,如肥胖患者,确诊后5年内,老年人
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Healthy Are the Diets of Cancer Survivors? Characteristics of Those Most at Risk and Opportunities for Improvement.

Background: Diet quality and adherence to dietary guidelines are strong predictors of positive cancer outcomes among survivors.

Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using 2-day dietary recalls from a nationwide sample of 818 survivors of 9 obesity-related cancers with ≥70% 5-year survival who expressed interest in a web-based diet and exercise trial. Total diet quality scores and component subscores were generated using the Health Eating Index-2020 (HEI-2020). Subgroup analyses examined differences by cancer diagnosis and treatment, body weight status, and sociodemographic factors.

Results: The mean [SD] HEI-2020 score among survivors was 51.6 [12.05] out of 100-approximately 10 points below norms for comparably aged Americans in the general population. Clinically meaningful deficits were observed for intakes of fruits, vegetables, dairy products, and protein (especially from plant and seafood sources). Survivors' intakes also included excessive amounts of refined grains. Compared with the general population, however, survivors' intakes more closely aligned with guidelines in terms of higher whole grain intake and lower consumption of sodium, saturated fat, and sugar (including sugar-sweetened beverages). Overall diet quality and/or component scores were significantly lower among younger survivors (age <65 years) and those within 5 years of diagnosis, with obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2), of lower education (high school diploma or less), and residing in areas of higher socioeconomic deprivation (Area Deprivation Index ≥50th percentile) (all P<.05). No significant subgroup differences were detected by cancer type or treatment.

Conclusions: Diet quality among survivors of obesity-related cancers is notably suboptimal. Clinicians should leverage survivors' interest in diet and exercise interventions to provide support and referrals targeting identified areas of need, particularly for those at highest risk, such as individuals with obesity, within 5 years of diagnosis, aged <65 years, with a high school diploma or less, and residing in areas of higher socioeconomic deprivation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
388
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JNCCN—Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network is a peer-reviewed medical journal read by over 25,000 oncologists and cancer care professionals nationwide. This indexed publication delivers the latest insights into best clinical practices, oncology health services research, and translational medicine. Notably, JNCCN provides updates on the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology® (NCCN Guidelines®), review articles elaborating on guideline recommendations, health services research, and case reports that spotlight molecular insights in patient care. Guided by its vision, JNCCN seeks to advance the mission of NCCN by serving as the primary resource for information on NCCN Guidelines®, innovation in translational medicine, and scientific studies related to oncology health services research. This encompasses quality care and value, bioethics, comparative and cost effectiveness, public policy, and interventional research on supportive care and survivorship. JNCCN boasts indexing by prominent databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Chemical Abstracts, Embase, EmCare, and Scopus, reinforcing its standing as a reputable source for comprehensive information in the field of oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信