Harleen Kaur, Maria Pisu, Dori W Pekmezi, Laura Q Rogers, Michelle Y Martin, Kevin R Fontaine, Kaitlyn J Waugaman, Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
{"title":"癌症幸存者的饮食有多健康?风险最大的特点和改进的机会。","authors":"Harleen Kaur, Maria Pisu, Dori W Pekmezi, Laura Q Rogers, Michelle Y Martin, Kevin R Fontaine, Kaitlyn J Waugaman, Wendy Demark-Wahnefried","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2025.7012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diet quality and adherence to dietary guidelines are strong predictors of positive cancer outcomes among survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using 2-day dietary recalls from a nationwide sample of 818 survivors of 9 obesity-related cancers with ≥70% 5-year survival who expressed interest in a web-based diet and exercise trial. Total diet quality scores and component subscores were generated using the Health Eating Index-2020 (HEI-2020). Subgroup analyses examined differences by cancer diagnosis and treatment, body weight status, and sociodemographic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean [SD] HEI-2020 score among survivors was 51.6 [12.05] out of 100-approximately 10 points below norms for comparably aged Americans in the general population. Clinically meaningful deficits were observed for intakes of fruits, vegetables, dairy products, and protein (especially from plant and seafood sources). Survivors' intakes also included excessive amounts of refined grains. Compared with the general population, however, survivors' intakes more closely aligned with guidelines in terms of higher whole grain intake and lower consumption of sodium, saturated fat, and sugar (including sugar-sweetened beverages). Overall diet quality and/or component scores were significantly lower among younger survivors (age <65 years) and those within 5 years of diagnosis, with obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2), of lower education (high school diploma or less), and residing in areas of higher socioeconomic deprivation (Area Deprivation Index ≥50th percentile) (all P<.05). No significant subgroup differences were detected by cancer type or treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diet quality among survivors of obesity-related cancers is notably suboptimal. Clinicians should leverage survivors' interest in diet and exercise interventions to provide support and referrals targeting identified areas of need, particularly for those at highest risk, such as individuals with obesity, within 5 years of diagnosis, aged <65 years, with a high school diploma or less, and residing in areas of higher socioeconomic deprivation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Healthy Are the Diets of Cancer Survivors? Characteristics of Those Most at Risk and Opportunities for Improvement.\",\"authors\":\"Harleen Kaur, Maria Pisu, Dori W Pekmezi, Laura Q Rogers, Michelle Y Martin, Kevin R Fontaine, Kaitlyn J Waugaman, Wendy Demark-Wahnefried\",\"doi\":\"10.6004/jnccn.2025.7012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diet quality and adherence to dietary guidelines are strong predictors of positive cancer outcomes among survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using 2-day dietary recalls from a nationwide sample of 818 survivors of 9 obesity-related cancers with ≥70% 5-year survival who expressed interest in a web-based diet and exercise trial. Total diet quality scores and component subscores were generated using the Health Eating Index-2020 (HEI-2020). Subgroup analyses examined differences by cancer diagnosis and treatment, body weight status, and sociodemographic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean [SD] HEI-2020 score among survivors was 51.6 [12.05] out of 100-approximately 10 points below norms for comparably aged Americans in the general population. Clinically meaningful deficits were observed for intakes of fruits, vegetables, dairy products, and protein (especially from plant and seafood sources). Survivors' intakes also included excessive amounts of refined grains. Compared with the general population, however, survivors' intakes more closely aligned with guidelines in terms of higher whole grain intake and lower consumption of sodium, saturated fat, and sugar (including sugar-sweetened beverages). Overall diet quality and/or component scores were significantly lower among younger survivors (age <65 years) and those within 5 years of diagnosis, with obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2), of lower education (high school diploma or less), and residing in areas of higher socioeconomic deprivation (Area Deprivation Index ≥50th percentile) (all P<.05). No significant subgroup differences were detected by cancer type or treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diet quality among survivors of obesity-related cancers is notably suboptimal. Clinicians should leverage survivors' interest in diet and exercise interventions to provide support and referrals targeting identified areas of need, particularly for those at highest risk, such as individuals with obesity, within 5 years of diagnosis, aged <65 years, with a high school diploma or less, and residing in areas of higher socioeconomic deprivation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2025.7012\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2025.7012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
How Healthy Are the Diets of Cancer Survivors? Characteristics of Those Most at Risk and Opportunities for Improvement.
Background: Diet quality and adherence to dietary guidelines are strong predictors of positive cancer outcomes among survivors.
Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using 2-day dietary recalls from a nationwide sample of 818 survivors of 9 obesity-related cancers with ≥70% 5-year survival who expressed interest in a web-based diet and exercise trial. Total diet quality scores and component subscores were generated using the Health Eating Index-2020 (HEI-2020). Subgroup analyses examined differences by cancer diagnosis and treatment, body weight status, and sociodemographic factors.
Results: The mean [SD] HEI-2020 score among survivors was 51.6 [12.05] out of 100-approximately 10 points below norms for comparably aged Americans in the general population. Clinically meaningful deficits were observed for intakes of fruits, vegetables, dairy products, and protein (especially from plant and seafood sources). Survivors' intakes also included excessive amounts of refined grains. Compared with the general population, however, survivors' intakes more closely aligned with guidelines in terms of higher whole grain intake and lower consumption of sodium, saturated fat, and sugar (including sugar-sweetened beverages). Overall diet quality and/or component scores were significantly lower among younger survivors (age <65 years) and those within 5 years of diagnosis, with obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2), of lower education (high school diploma or less), and residing in areas of higher socioeconomic deprivation (Area Deprivation Index ≥50th percentile) (all P<.05). No significant subgroup differences were detected by cancer type or treatment.
Conclusions: Diet quality among survivors of obesity-related cancers is notably suboptimal. Clinicians should leverage survivors' interest in diet and exercise interventions to provide support and referrals targeting identified areas of need, particularly for those at highest risk, such as individuals with obesity, within 5 years of diagnosis, aged <65 years, with a high school diploma or less, and residing in areas of higher socioeconomic deprivation.
期刊介绍:
JNCCN—Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network is a peer-reviewed medical journal read by over 25,000 oncologists and cancer care professionals nationwide. This indexed publication delivers the latest insights into best clinical practices, oncology health services research, and translational medicine. Notably, JNCCN provides updates on the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology® (NCCN Guidelines®), review articles elaborating on guideline recommendations, health services research, and case reports that spotlight molecular insights in patient care.
Guided by its vision, JNCCN seeks to advance the mission of NCCN by serving as the primary resource for information on NCCN Guidelines®, innovation in translational medicine, and scientific studies related to oncology health services research. This encompasses quality care and value, bioethics, comparative and cost effectiveness, public policy, and interventional research on supportive care and survivorship.
JNCCN boasts indexing by prominent databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Chemical Abstracts, Embase, EmCare, and Scopus, reinforcing its standing as a reputable source for comprehensive information in the field of oncology.