老年患者halo背心固定治疗的临床效果。

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Phillip T Yang, Haseeb E Goheer, Clarke I Cady-McCrea, Robert W Molinari, Varun Puvanesarajah
{"title":"老年患者halo背心固定治疗的临床效果。","authors":"Phillip T Yang, Haseeb E Goheer, Clarke I Cady-McCrea, Robert W Molinari, Varun Puvanesarajah","doi":"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_201_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is a lack of consensus on the efficacy and safety of halo vest immobilization (HVI) in elderly patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate HVI's impact on outcomes in patients 60 years or older with cervical spine fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of patients 60 years or older who underwent HVI for treatment of cervical spine fractures between January 2003 and March 2024 at a single institution. Key features of clinical presentation, outcomes at final follow-up, complications, and 1-year mortality rates were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 54 patients were included for analysis. The average time spent in a halo vest was 2.69 (0.58) months, and the average time to final follow-up was 5.49 (5.84) months. The most common fracture morphologies were the Hangman variant (29.6%) and type III odontoid (29.6%). Forty-nine patients (94.2%) out of 52 patients considered were successfully treated as defined by the lack of need for surgical intervention. Three patients (5.6%) experienced medical complications; two of the three patients died within 30 days of HVI. Lastly, 18 patients (33.3%) experienced HVI instrumentation-related complications, the most common of which was loose halo pins (13.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HVI is associated with lower morbidity and mortality in elderly patients than previously reported and thus may be safely used in this population. However, providers should be mindful of initial clinical presentation and underlying comorbidities when weighing between surgical and nonsurgical intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":51721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","volume":"16 1","pages":"96-100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12029392/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical outcomes of elderly patients treated with halo vest immobilization.\",\"authors\":\"Phillip T Yang, Haseeb E Goheer, Clarke I Cady-McCrea, Robert W Molinari, Varun Puvanesarajah\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_201_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is a lack of consensus on the efficacy and safety of halo vest immobilization (HVI) in elderly patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate HVI's impact on outcomes in patients 60 years or older with cervical spine fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of patients 60 years or older who underwent HVI for treatment of cervical spine fractures between January 2003 and March 2024 at a single institution. Key features of clinical presentation, outcomes at final follow-up, complications, and 1-year mortality rates were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 54 patients were included for analysis. The average time spent in a halo vest was 2.69 (0.58) months, and the average time to final follow-up was 5.49 (5.84) months. The most common fracture morphologies were the Hangman variant (29.6%) and type III odontoid (29.6%). Forty-nine patients (94.2%) out of 52 patients considered were successfully treated as defined by the lack of need for surgical intervention. Three patients (5.6%) experienced medical complications; two of the three patients died within 30 days of HVI. Lastly, 18 patients (33.3%) experienced HVI instrumentation-related complications, the most common of which was loose halo pins (13.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HVI is associated with lower morbidity and mortality in elderly patients than previously reported and thus may be safely used in this population. However, providers should be mindful of initial clinical presentation and underlying comorbidities when weighing between surgical and nonsurgical intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"96-100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12029392/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_201_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_201_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导论:对于老年患者使用halo背心固定(HVI)的有效性和安全性,目前还缺乏共识。本研究的目的是评估HVI对60岁及以上颈椎骨折患者预后的影响。方法:这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象为2003年1月至2024年3月在同一家机构接受HVI治疗的60岁及以上的颈椎骨折患者。记录临床表现、最终随访结果、并发症和1年死亡率的主要特征。结果:共纳入54例患者进行分析。光晕背心的平均使用时间为2.69(0.58)个月,至最终随访的平均时间为5.49(5.84)个月。最常见的骨折形态为Hangman型(29.6%)和III型齿状突(29.6%)。52例患者中49例(94.2%)成功治疗,定义为不需要手术干预。3例(5.6%)出现医学并发症;三名患者中有两名在感染艾滋病毒30天内死亡。最后,18例患者(33.3%)出现了与HVI器械相关的并发症,其中最常见的是松动的晕针(13.0%)。结论:与先前报道相比,HVI在老年患者中的发病率和死亡率较低,因此可以安全地用于该人群。然而,当权衡手术和非手术干预时,提供者应该注意最初的临床表现和潜在的合并症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical outcomes of elderly patients treated with halo vest immobilization.

Introduction: There is a lack of consensus on the efficacy and safety of halo vest immobilization (HVI) in elderly patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate HVI's impact on outcomes in patients 60 years or older with cervical spine fractures.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients 60 years or older who underwent HVI for treatment of cervical spine fractures between January 2003 and March 2024 at a single institution. Key features of clinical presentation, outcomes at final follow-up, complications, and 1-year mortality rates were recorded.

Results: A total of 54 patients were included for analysis. The average time spent in a halo vest was 2.69 (0.58) months, and the average time to final follow-up was 5.49 (5.84) months. The most common fracture morphologies were the Hangman variant (29.6%) and type III odontoid (29.6%). Forty-nine patients (94.2%) out of 52 patients considered were successfully treated as defined by the lack of need for surgical intervention. Three patients (5.6%) experienced medical complications; two of the three patients died within 30 days of HVI. Lastly, 18 patients (33.3%) experienced HVI instrumentation-related complications, the most common of which was loose halo pins (13.0%).

Conclusion: HVI is associated with lower morbidity and mortality in elderly patients than previously reported and thus may be safely used in this population. However, providers should be mindful of initial clinical presentation and underlying comorbidities when weighing between surgical and nonsurgical intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信