孕前保健对全球健康的限制。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Miranda R Waggoner, Michelle Pentecost
{"title":"孕前保健对全球健康的限制。","authors":"Miranda R Waggoner, Michelle Pentecost","doi":"10.1080/26410397.2025.2499329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Global health programmes aimed at reducing maternal and childhood mortality and morbidity are increasingly employing the concept of \"preconception care\" - an approach that the World Health Organization defines as interventions that occur before women (or couples) conceive and that address factors that could lead to poor birth outcomes. While the goal of improving maternal and child health outcomes is a vital one that is most assuredly shared by all in the global health community, the concept of preconception care is not without its limits and has significant drawbacks. From a gender rights and equity perspective, the preconception care framework has the potential to introduce harms and risks to women and people capable of getting pregnant. In this article, we summarise the key concerns about preconception care for global health in the twenty-first century. We recommend alternative frameworks that do not revolve around conception and have the potential to benefit all, including women, men, people who can get pregnant, people who do not want to get pregnant, pregnant individuals, and children.</p>","PeriodicalId":37074,"journal":{"name":"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters","volume":" ","pages":"2499329"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The limits of preconception care for global health.\",\"authors\":\"Miranda R Waggoner, Michelle Pentecost\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/26410397.2025.2499329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Global health programmes aimed at reducing maternal and childhood mortality and morbidity are increasingly employing the concept of \\\"preconception care\\\" - an approach that the World Health Organization defines as interventions that occur before women (or couples) conceive and that address factors that could lead to poor birth outcomes. While the goal of improving maternal and child health outcomes is a vital one that is most assuredly shared by all in the global health community, the concept of preconception care is not without its limits and has significant drawbacks. From a gender rights and equity perspective, the preconception care framework has the potential to introduce harms and risks to women and people capable of getting pregnant. In this article, we summarise the key concerns about preconception care for global health in the twenty-first century. We recommend alternative frameworks that do not revolve around conception and have the potential to benefit all, including women, men, people who can get pregnant, people who do not want to get pregnant, pregnant individuals, and children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2499329\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2025.2499329\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2025.2499329","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

旨在降低孕产妇和儿童死亡率和发病率的全球保健方案越来越多地采用“孕前护理”的概念——世界卫生组织(世卫组织,2012年;世卫组织(2013年)将其定义为在妇女(或夫妇)怀孕之前发生的干预措施,旨在解决可能导致不良生育结果的因素。虽然改善孕产妇和儿童健康结果的目标是全球卫生界所有人最肯定的共同目标,但孕前护理的概念并非没有其局限性,并且存在重大缺陷。从性别权利和平等的角度来看,孕前护理框架有可能给妇女和有能力怀孕的人带来伤害和风险。在这篇文章中,我们总结了21世纪全球健康的孕前护理的关键问题。我们推荐不以受孕为中心的替代框架,并有可能使所有人受益,包括妇女、男子、能够怀孕的人、不想怀孕的人、孕妇和儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The limits of preconception care for global health.

Global health programmes aimed at reducing maternal and childhood mortality and morbidity are increasingly employing the concept of "preconception care" - an approach that the World Health Organization defines as interventions that occur before women (or couples) conceive and that address factors that could lead to poor birth outcomes. While the goal of improving maternal and child health outcomes is a vital one that is most assuredly shared by all in the global health community, the concept of preconception care is not without its limits and has significant drawbacks. From a gender rights and equity perspective, the preconception care framework has the potential to introduce harms and risks to women and people capable of getting pregnant. In this article, we summarise the key concerns about preconception care for global health in the twenty-first century. We recommend alternative frameworks that do not revolve around conception and have the potential to benefit all, including women, men, people who can get pregnant, people who do not want to get pregnant, pregnant individuals, and children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters
Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
63
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: SRHM is a multidisciplinary journal, welcoming submissions from a wide range of disciplines, including the social sciences and humanities, behavioural science, public health, human rights and law. The journal welcomes a range of methodological approaches, including qualitative and quantitative analyses such as policy analysis; mixed methods approaches to public health and health systems research; economic, political and historical analysis; and epidemiological work with a focus on SRHR. Key topics addressed in SRHM include (but are not limited to) abortion, family planning, contraception, female genital mutilation, HIV and other STIs, human papillomavirus (HPV), maternal health, SRHR in humanitarian settings, gender-based and other forms of interpersonal violence, young people, gender, sexuality, sexual rights and sexual pleasure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信