{"title":"腹腔镜胆囊切除术中经脐切口与脐周切口手术部位感染率的比较分析:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Vorapatu Tangsirapat, Mati Rattanasakalwong, Jantaluck Nuchanatanon, Vittawat Ohmpornnuwat, Papot Charutragulchai, Singha Sripreechapattana, Panutchaya Kongon, Kitti Wongta","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-11770-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the standard treatment for gallstone disease offering advantages such as minimal incision size and rapid recovery. The study compares the surgical site infection (SSI) rates between transumbilical (TUI) and periumbilical incisions (PUI) in this method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted from December 2021 to December 2023 at Panyananthaphikkhu Chonprathan Medical Center, Thailand. Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to TUI or PUI groups. The primary endpoint was SSI rate, with secondary endpoints including length of hospital stay, operative time, blood loss, conversion rate, complications, cosmetic satisfaction, pain score, wound hypersensitivity, and numbness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 156 patients were enrolled, with 78 patients in each group. The incidence of SSI was 14.1% in the TUI group and 10.3% in the PUI group (p = 0.46). There were no conversions to open surgery, bile leaks, intra-abdominal infections, reoperations, or mortalities observed in either group. Outcomes related to cosmetic satisfaction, wound numbness, and wound hypersensitivity were comparable between the groups. Patients who developed SSI demonstrated lower cosmetic satisfaction scores on postoperative day 7 surgery (8.47 ± 1.3) compared to those without SSI (9.5 ± 0.8) (p < 0.001), although these scores were similar by day 30. Additionally, the SSI group exhibited a higher prevalence of umbilical wound hypersensitivity on day 30 post-surgery [11 (57.9%) vs. 35 (25.7%), p = 0.04].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SSI rates and other surgical outcomes were comparable between TUI and PUI in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, encouraging the use of either technique based on surgeon preference and patient-specific factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"3807-3813"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12116724/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of surgical site infection rates between transumbilical and periumbilical incisions in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Vorapatu Tangsirapat, Mati Rattanasakalwong, Jantaluck Nuchanatanon, Vittawat Ohmpornnuwat, Papot Charutragulchai, Singha Sripreechapattana, Panutchaya Kongon, Kitti Wongta\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00464-025-11770-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the standard treatment for gallstone disease offering advantages such as minimal incision size and rapid recovery. The study compares the surgical site infection (SSI) rates between transumbilical (TUI) and periumbilical incisions (PUI) in this method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted from December 2021 to December 2023 at Panyananthaphikkhu Chonprathan Medical Center, Thailand. Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to TUI or PUI groups. The primary endpoint was SSI rate, with secondary endpoints including length of hospital stay, operative time, blood loss, conversion rate, complications, cosmetic satisfaction, pain score, wound hypersensitivity, and numbness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 156 patients were enrolled, with 78 patients in each group. The incidence of SSI was 14.1% in the TUI group and 10.3% in the PUI group (p = 0.46). There were no conversions to open surgery, bile leaks, intra-abdominal infections, reoperations, or mortalities observed in either group. Outcomes related to cosmetic satisfaction, wound numbness, and wound hypersensitivity were comparable between the groups. Patients who developed SSI demonstrated lower cosmetic satisfaction scores on postoperative day 7 surgery (8.47 ± 1.3) compared to those without SSI (9.5 ± 0.8) (p < 0.001), although these scores were similar by day 30. Additionally, the SSI group exhibited a higher prevalence of umbilical wound hypersensitivity on day 30 post-surgery [11 (57.9%) vs. 35 (25.7%), p = 0.04].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SSI rates and other surgical outcomes were comparable between TUI and PUI in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, encouraging the use of either technique based on surgeon preference and patient-specific factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3807-3813\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12116724/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11770-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11770-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative analysis of surgical site infection rates between transumbilical and periumbilical incisions in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the standard treatment for gallstone disease offering advantages such as minimal incision size and rapid recovery. The study compares the surgical site infection (SSI) rates between transumbilical (TUI) and periumbilical incisions (PUI) in this method.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted from December 2021 to December 2023 at Panyananthaphikkhu Chonprathan Medical Center, Thailand. Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to TUI or PUI groups. The primary endpoint was SSI rate, with secondary endpoints including length of hospital stay, operative time, blood loss, conversion rate, complications, cosmetic satisfaction, pain score, wound hypersensitivity, and numbness.
Results: A total of 156 patients were enrolled, with 78 patients in each group. The incidence of SSI was 14.1% in the TUI group and 10.3% in the PUI group (p = 0.46). There were no conversions to open surgery, bile leaks, intra-abdominal infections, reoperations, or mortalities observed in either group. Outcomes related to cosmetic satisfaction, wound numbness, and wound hypersensitivity were comparable between the groups. Patients who developed SSI demonstrated lower cosmetic satisfaction scores on postoperative day 7 surgery (8.47 ± 1.3) compared to those without SSI (9.5 ± 0.8) (p < 0.001), although these scores were similar by day 30. Additionally, the SSI group exhibited a higher prevalence of umbilical wound hypersensitivity on day 30 post-surgery [11 (57.9%) vs. 35 (25.7%), p = 0.04].
Conclusions: SSI rates and other surgical outcomes were comparable between TUI and PUI in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, encouraging the use of either technique based on surgeon preference and patient-specific factors.
期刊介绍:
Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research.
Topics covered in the journal include:
-Surgical aspects of:
Interventional endoscopy,
Ultrasound,
Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology,
-Gastroenterologic surgery
-Thoracic surgery
-Traumatic surgery
-Orthopedic surgery
-Pediatric surgery