开发一个基于价值观的跨组织关怀在澳大利亚的临终合作框架:一种混合方法,基于实践的研究协议。

IF 2.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Care and Social Practice Pub Date : 2025-05-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26323524251337491
Carol Hope, Leah East, John Rosenberg, Melissa Taylor
{"title":"开发一个基于价值观的跨组织关怀在澳大利亚的临终合作框架:一种混合方法,基于实践的研究协议。","authors":"Carol Hope, Leah East, John Rosenberg, Melissa Taylor","doi":"10.1177/26323524251337491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the population ages and the demand for quality care at the end of life increases, health costs are increasing, thus creating a perfect storm of need, outstripping the supply of palliative care services. Engaging communities to support care at the end of life through the establishment of values-based interorganisational Care at the End-of-Life Collaboratives is one approach to addressing this problem. Whilst there is an abundance of literature about collaboratives, understanding of those supporting care at the end of life is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this research are to understand the contextual factors using an evaluation framework that support the success of values-based interorganisational Care at the End-of-Life Collaboratives to achieve system improvements at a regional level and develop a framework for establishing sustainable Care at the End-of-Life Collaboratives in jurisdictions across Australia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a two-phase study that uses a mixed-methods case study and a Delphi methodology.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Phase I data collection is based on the RE-AIM framework, which uses the Partnership Self-Assessment Tool (PSAT) and semi-structured interviews with Collaborative members and key stakeholders. A review of collaborative documentation, including meeting minutes and reports, will also be completed. Phase II will include a minimum of two surveys of the expert group recruited from the peak palliative care bodies across Australia. Quantitative data in this study will be analysed using descriptive statistics and frequency distributions. A reflexive approach to content analysis of qualitative data will be adopted.</p><p><strong>Ethics: </strong>This research is approved by the University of Southern Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee (approval ETH2023-0718).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Understanding the contextual factors that contribute to the sustainability of an existing Care at the End-of-Life Collaborative within Australia will enable the foundation of a framework for developing similar collaboratives, for refinement through expert consensus using Delphi methodology.</p>","PeriodicalId":36693,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","volume":"19 ","pages":"26323524251337491"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12062592/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a values-based interorganisational Care at the End-of-Life Collaborative framework for the Australian context: A mixed-methods, practice-based research protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Carol Hope, Leah East, John Rosenberg, Melissa Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26323524251337491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the population ages and the demand for quality care at the end of life increases, health costs are increasing, thus creating a perfect storm of need, outstripping the supply of palliative care services. Engaging communities to support care at the end of life through the establishment of values-based interorganisational Care at the End-of-Life Collaboratives is one approach to addressing this problem. Whilst there is an abundance of literature about collaboratives, understanding of those supporting care at the end of life is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this research are to understand the contextual factors using an evaluation framework that support the success of values-based interorganisational Care at the End-of-Life Collaboratives to achieve system improvements at a regional level and develop a framework for establishing sustainable Care at the End-of-Life Collaboratives in jurisdictions across Australia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a two-phase study that uses a mixed-methods case study and a Delphi methodology.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Phase I data collection is based on the RE-AIM framework, which uses the Partnership Self-Assessment Tool (PSAT) and semi-structured interviews with Collaborative members and key stakeholders. A review of collaborative documentation, including meeting minutes and reports, will also be completed. Phase II will include a minimum of two surveys of the expert group recruited from the peak palliative care bodies across Australia. Quantitative data in this study will be analysed using descriptive statistics and frequency distributions. A reflexive approach to content analysis of qualitative data will be adopted.</p><p><strong>Ethics: </strong>This research is approved by the University of Southern Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee (approval ETH2023-0718).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Understanding the contextual factors that contribute to the sustainability of an existing Care at the End-of-Life Collaborative within Australia will enable the foundation of a framework for developing similar collaboratives, for refinement through expert consensus using Delphi methodology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative Care and Social Practice\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"26323524251337491\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12062592/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative Care and Social Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524251337491\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524251337491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着人口老龄化和对生命末期高质量护理的需求增加,卫生费用也在增加,从而形成了需求的完美风暴,超过了姑息治疗服务的供应。通过建立以价值观为基础的跨组织临终关怀合作,让社区参与到临终关怀中来,是解决这一问题的一种方法。虽然有大量关于合作的文献,但对那些支持临终关怀的人的理解却很缺乏。目的:本研究的目的是利用一个评估框架来了解背景因素,该框架支持基于价值观的跨组织临终关怀合作的成功,以实现区域层面的系统改进,并制定一个框架,在澳大利亚各地的司法管辖区建立可持续的临终关怀合作。设计:这是一个两阶段的研究,使用混合方法的案例研究和德尔菲方法。方法和分析:第一阶段的数据收集基于RE-AIM框架,该框架使用伙伴关系自我评估工具(PSAT)和对协作成员和关键利益相关者的半结构化访谈。还将完成对协作文件,包括会议纪要和报告的审查。第二阶段将包括至少两次调查的专家小组从高峰缓和治疗机构在澳大利亚招募。本研究中的定量数据将使用描述性统计和频率分布进行分析。将采用反思性方法对定性数据进行内容分析。伦理:本研究经南昆士兰大学人类研究伦理委员会批准(批准号ETH2023-0718)。讨论:了解有助于澳大利亚现有临终关怀协作的可持续性的背景因素,将为开发类似协作的框架奠定基础,并通过使用德尔菲方法的专家共识进行改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing a values-based interorganisational Care at the End-of-Life Collaborative framework for the Australian context: A mixed-methods, practice-based research protocol.

Background: As the population ages and the demand for quality care at the end of life increases, health costs are increasing, thus creating a perfect storm of need, outstripping the supply of palliative care services. Engaging communities to support care at the end of life through the establishment of values-based interorganisational Care at the End-of-Life Collaboratives is one approach to addressing this problem. Whilst there is an abundance of literature about collaboratives, understanding of those supporting care at the end of life is lacking.

Objectives: The objectives of this research are to understand the contextual factors using an evaluation framework that support the success of values-based interorganisational Care at the End-of-Life Collaboratives to achieve system improvements at a regional level and develop a framework for establishing sustainable Care at the End-of-Life Collaboratives in jurisdictions across Australia.

Design: This is a two-phase study that uses a mixed-methods case study and a Delphi methodology.

Methods and analysis: Phase I data collection is based on the RE-AIM framework, which uses the Partnership Self-Assessment Tool (PSAT) and semi-structured interviews with Collaborative members and key stakeholders. A review of collaborative documentation, including meeting minutes and reports, will also be completed. Phase II will include a minimum of two surveys of the expert group recruited from the peak palliative care bodies across Australia. Quantitative data in this study will be analysed using descriptive statistics and frequency distributions. A reflexive approach to content analysis of qualitative data will be adopted.

Ethics: This research is approved by the University of Southern Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee (approval ETH2023-0718).

Discussion: Understanding the contextual factors that contribute to the sustainability of an existing Care at the End-of-Life Collaborative within Australia will enable the foundation of a framework for developing similar collaboratives, for refinement through expert consensus using Delphi methodology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative Care and Social Practice
Palliative Care and Social Practice Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信