西班牙卫生技术评估体系的挑战与改革:西班牙2019年至2022年影响药品报销决策的标准分析

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Pilar Pinilla-Dominguez, Jaime Pinilla-Dominguez
{"title":"西班牙卫生技术评估体系的挑战与改革:西班牙2019年至2022年影响药品报销决策的标准分析","authors":"Pilar Pinilla-Dominguez, Jaime Pinilla-Dominguez","doi":"10.1007/s10198-025-01790-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyse the criteria influencing medicines' reimbursement decisions in the Spanish National Health Service and assess the extent to which these decisions have been supported by health technology assessment (HTA), considering the ongoing HTA reform.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The sample includes all new medicines and new indications undergoing reimbursement between May 2019 and December 2022 in Spain. Criteria influencing the decision were derived from the Interministerial Pricing Committee for Medicines' reports. These were matched with the HTA reports obtained from the Spanish Medicines Agency's website. Spanish decisions are compared to those in France and England. The analyses include descriptive analysis, association statistical tests, sentiment text analysis, keyword extraction, decision analysis, and clustering.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 477 therapeutic indications, 253 could be matched to a HTA report. Positive recommendations (n = 110) were statistically significantly associated with severity and therapeutic value (including clinical and cost effectiveness) criteria, whereas negative recommendations (n = 143) were mostly associated with criteria based on budget impact and availability of a cheaper alternative option (p < 0.05). The innovation criterion was not used to support any decision. Only 9.49% of reimbursement reports mentioned the HTA in the conclusions, and 21.74% of the HTAs included keywords aligned with the specific decision-making criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The criteria used to justify the reimbursement decisions of medicines in Spain do not align with the information included in the HTA. This discrepancy highlights the need for the ongoing HTA reform to develop an appraisal framework that aligns with the HTA assessment in a transparent, rigorous, and inclusive manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":51416,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges and reforms in Spain's health technology assessment system: analysis of criteria influencing medicines' reimbursement decisions between 2019 and 2022 in Spain.\",\"authors\":\"Pilar Pinilla-Dominguez, Jaime Pinilla-Dominguez\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10198-025-01790-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyse the criteria influencing medicines' reimbursement decisions in the Spanish National Health Service and assess the extent to which these decisions have been supported by health technology assessment (HTA), considering the ongoing HTA reform.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The sample includes all new medicines and new indications undergoing reimbursement between May 2019 and December 2022 in Spain. Criteria influencing the decision were derived from the Interministerial Pricing Committee for Medicines' reports. These were matched with the HTA reports obtained from the Spanish Medicines Agency's website. Spanish decisions are compared to those in France and England. The analyses include descriptive analysis, association statistical tests, sentiment text analysis, keyword extraction, decision analysis, and clustering.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 477 therapeutic indications, 253 could be matched to a HTA report. Positive recommendations (n = 110) were statistically significantly associated with severity and therapeutic value (including clinical and cost effectiveness) criteria, whereas negative recommendations (n = 143) were mostly associated with criteria based on budget impact and availability of a cheaper alternative option (p < 0.05). The innovation criterion was not used to support any decision. Only 9.49% of reimbursement reports mentioned the HTA in the conclusions, and 21.74% of the HTAs included keywords aligned with the specific decision-making criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The criteria used to justify the reimbursement decisions of medicines in Spain do not align with the information included in the HTA. This discrepancy highlights the need for the ongoing HTA reform to develop an appraisal framework that aligns with the HTA assessment in a transparent, rigorous, and inclusive manner.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Health Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Health Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-025-01790-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-025-01790-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析影响西班牙国家卫生服务体系药品报销决策的标准,并评估卫生技术评估(HTA)支持这些决策的程度,考虑到正在进行的HTA改革。材料和方法:样本包括2019年5月至2022年12月在西班牙报销的所有新药和新适应症。影响决定的标准来自部际药品定价委员会的报告。这些数据与HTA从西班牙药品管理局网站上获得的报告相匹配。西班牙的决定与法国和英国的决定相比较。分析包括描述性分析、关联统计测试、情感文本分析、关键字提取、决策分析和聚类。结果:在477个治疗指征中,253个符合HTA报告。积极建议(n = 110)与严重程度和治疗价值(包括临床和成本效益)标准在统计学上显著相关,而消极建议(n = 143)主要与基于预算影响和更便宜替代方案的可用性的标准相关(p结论:西班牙用于证明药物报销决策的标准与HTA中包含的信息不一致。这一差异凸显了正在进行的HTA改革的必要性,即以透明、严格和包容的方式制定与HTA评估相一致的评估框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Challenges and reforms in Spain's health technology assessment system: analysis of criteria influencing medicines' reimbursement decisions between 2019 and 2022 in Spain.

Objective: To analyse the criteria influencing medicines' reimbursement decisions in the Spanish National Health Service and assess the extent to which these decisions have been supported by health technology assessment (HTA), considering the ongoing HTA reform.

Materials and methods: The sample includes all new medicines and new indications undergoing reimbursement between May 2019 and December 2022 in Spain. Criteria influencing the decision were derived from the Interministerial Pricing Committee for Medicines' reports. These were matched with the HTA reports obtained from the Spanish Medicines Agency's website. Spanish decisions are compared to those in France and England. The analyses include descriptive analysis, association statistical tests, sentiment text analysis, keyword extraction, decision analysis, and clustering.

Results: Out of 477 therapeutic indications, 253 could be matched to a HTA report. Positive recommendations (n = 110) were statistically significantly associated with severity and therapeutic value (including clinical and cost effectiveness) criteria, whereas negative recommendations (n = 143) were mostly associated with criteria based on budget impact and availability of a cheaper alternative option (p < 0.05). The innovation criterion was not used to support any decision. Only 9.49% of reimbursement reports mentioned the HTA in the conclusions, and 21.74% of the HTAs included keywords aligned with the specific decision-making criteria.

Conclusion: The criteria used to justify the reimbursement decisions of medicines in Spain do not align with the information included in the HTA. This discrepancy highlights the need for the ongoing HTA reform to develop an appraisal framework that aligns with the HTA assessment in a transparent, rigorous, and inclusive manner.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Health Economics is a journal of Health Economics and associated disciplines. The growing demand for health economics and the introduction of new guidelines in various European countries were the motivation to generate a highly scientific and at the same time practice oriented journal considering the requirements of various health care systems in Europe. The international scientific board of opinion leaders guarantees high-quality, peer-reviewed publications as well as articles for pragmatic approaches in the field of health economics. We intend to cover all aspects of health economics: • Basics of health economic approaches and methods • Pharmacoeconomics • Health Care Systems • Pricing and Reimbursement Systems • Quality-of-Life-Studies The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements. Officially cited as: Eur J Health Econ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信