{"title":"西班牙卫生技术评估体系的挑战与改革:西班牙2019年至2022年影响药品报销决策的标准分析","authors":"Pilar Pinilla-Dominguez, Jaime Pinilla-Dominguez","doi":"10.1007/s10198-025-01790-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyse the criteria influencing medicines' reimbursement decisions in the Spanish National Health Service and assess the extent to which these decisions have been supported by health technology assessment (HTA), considering the ongoing HTA reform.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The sample includes all new medicines and new indications undergoing reimbursement between May 2019 and December 2022 in Spain. Criteria influencing the decision were derived from the Interministerial Pricing Committee for Medicines' reports. These were matched with the HTA reports obtained from the Spanish Medicines Agency's website. Spanish decisions are compared to those in France and England. The analyses include descriptive analysis, association statistical tests, sentiment text analysis, keyword extraction, decision analysis, and clustering.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 477 therapeutic indications, 253 could be matched to a HTA report. Positive recommendations (n = 110) were statistically significantly associated with severity and therapeutic value (including clinical and cost effectiveness) criteria, whereas negative recommendations (n = 143) were mostly associated with criteria based on budget impact and availability of a cheaper alternative option (p < 0.05). The innovation criterion was not used to support any decision. Only 9.49% of reimbursement reports mentioned the HTA in the conclusions, and 21.74% of the HTAs included keywords aligned with the specific decision-making criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The criteria used to justify the reimbursement decisions of medicines in Spain do not align with the information included in the HTA. This discrepancy highlights the need for the ongoing HTA reform to develop an appraisal framework that aligns with the HTA assessment in a transparent, rigorous, and inclusive manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":51416,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges and reforms in Spain's health technology assessment system: analysis of criteria influencing medicines' reimbursement decisions between 2019 and 2022 in Spain.\",\"authors\":\"Pilar Pinilla-Dominguez, Jaime Pinilla-Dominguez\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10198-025-01790-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyse the criteria influencing medicines' reimbursement decisions in the Spanish National Health Service and assess the extent to which these decisions have been supported by health technology assessment (HTA), considering the ongoing HTA reform.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The sample includes all new medicines and new indications undergoing reimbursement between May 2019 and December 2022 in Spain. Criteria influencing the decision were derived from the Interministerial Pricing Committee for Medicines' reports. These were matched with the HTA reports obtained from the Spanish Medicines Agency's website. Spanish decisions are compared to those in France and England. The analyses include descriptive analysis, association statistical tests, sentiment text analysis, keyword extraction, decision analysis, and clustering.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 477 therapeutic indications, 253 could be matched to a HTA report. Positive recommendations (n = 110) were statistically significantly associated with severity and therapeutic value (including clinical and cost effectiveness) criteria, whereas negative recommendations (n = 143) were mostly associated with criteria based on budget impact and availability of a cheaper alternative option (p < 0.05). The innovation criterion was not used to support any decision. Only 9.49% of reimbursement reports mentioned the HTA in the conclusions, and 21.74% of the HTAs included keywords aligned with the specific decision-making criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The criteria used to justify the reimbursement decisions of medicines in Spain do not align with the information included in the HTA. This discrepancy highlights the need for the ongoing HTA reform to develop an appraisal framework that aligns with the HTA assessment in a transparent, rigorous, and inclusive manner.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Health Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Health Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-025-01790-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-025-01790-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Challenges and reforms in Spain's health technology assessment system: analysis of criteria influencing medicines' reimbursement decisions between 2019 and 2022 in Spain.
Objective: To analyse the criteria influencing medicines' reimbursement decisions in the Spanish National Health Service and assess the extent to which these decisions have been supported by health technology assessment (HTA), considering the ongoing HTA reform.
Materials and methods: The sample includes all new medicines and new indications undergoing reimbursement between May 2019 and December 2022 in Spain. Criteria influencing the decision were derived from the Interministerial Pricing Committee for Medicines' reports. These were matched with the HTA reports obtained from the Spanish Medicines Agency's website. Spanish decisions are compared to those in France and England. The analyses include descriptive analysis, association statistical tests, sentiment text analysis, keyword extraction, decision analysis, and clustering.
Results: Out of 477 therapeutic indications, 253 could be matched to a HTA report. Positive recommendations (n = 110) were statistically significantly associated with severity and therapeutic value (including clinical and cost effectiveness) criteria, whereas negative recommendations (n = 143) were mostly associated with criteria based on budget impact and availability of a cheaper alternative option (p < 0.05). The innovation criterion was not used to support any decision. Only 9.49% of reimbursement reports mentioned the HTA in the conclusions, and 21.74% of the HTAs included keywords aligned with the specific decision-making criteria.
Conclusion: The criteria used to justify the reimbursement decisions of medicines in Spain do not align with the information included in the HTA. This discrepancy highlights the need for the ongoing HTA reform to develop an appraisal framework that aligns with the HTA assessment in a transparent, rigorous, and inclusive manner.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Health Economics is a journal of Health Economics and associated disciplines. The growing demand for health economics and the introduction of new guidelines in various European countries were the motivation to generate a highly scientific and at the same time practice oriented journal considering the requirements of various health care systems in Europe. The international scientific board of opinion leaders guarantees high-quality, peer-reviewed publications as well as articles for pragmatic approaches in the field of health economics. We intend to cover all aspects of health economics:
• Basics of health economic approaches and methods
• Pharmacoeconomics
• Health Care Systems
• Pricing and Reimbursement Systems
• Quality-of-Life-Studies The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements.
Officially cited as: Eur J Health Econ