在奥地利和法国前瞻性癌症患者样本中验证基于癌症特异性偏好的EORTC qu - c10d对通用仪器EQ-5D-5L和SF-6Dv2的有效性。

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
PharmacoEconomics Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-27 DOI:10.1007/s40273-025-01501-3
Micha J Pilz, Simone Seyringer, Virginie Nerich, Madeleine T King, Richard Norman, Eva M Gamper
{"title":"在奥地利和法国前瞻性癌症患者样本中验证基于癌症特异性偏好的EORTC qu - c10d对通用仪器EQ-5D-5L和SF-6Dv2的有效性。","authors":"Micha J Pilz, Simone Seyringer, Virginie Nerich, Madeleine T King, Richard Norman, Eva M Gamper","doi":"10.1007/s40273-025-01501-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Quality of Life Utility - Core 10 Dimensions (QLU-C10D) is a disease-specific preference-based measure (PBM) designed to obtain health state utility values from patients with cancer. Previously, satisfactory psychometric properties were established from retrospective trial analyses using clinical anchors. This study aimed to validate the QLU-C10D against two generic PBMs in a prospective sample of Austrian and French patients with cancer using patient-reported anchors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients completed the European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (QLQ-C30), EQ-5D-5L and Short Form 36 (SF-36) at study baseline (any time during anti-cancer treatment) plus a follow-up assessment 3-6 months later. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were assessed. QLU-C10D and SF-6Dv2 utilities were calculated from QLQ-C30 and SF-36 data, respectively. German, French and UK value sets were applied for all three PBMs. Floor and ceiling effects were assessed. Known-group validity (independent t-test) and responsiveness (paired t-tests) were assessed respectively by ability to detect health status differences and changes over time according to patient-rated overall quality of life/health perception assessed by the QLQ-C30 Global Health Status scale, the EQ-5D-5L VAS and the SF-36 General Health scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 465 patients were included in the analysis. QLU-C10D index scores (intra-class correlation) and domains (Pearson) were correlated with EQ-5D-5L and Short-Form Six Dimensions (SF-6Dv2) conceptual counterparts. Correlation coefficients for the index scores of QLU-C10D and the generic PBMs ranged from 0.63 to 0.81. The QLU-C10D detected statistically significant differences between groups at baseline in 100% of tests performed (n = 27). For changes over time, QLU-C10D detected expected effects in 68% of cases (n = 29). In comparison with the generic PBMs, QLU-C10D detected differences and changes with a higher statistical efficiency in 76% of cases (77 of 102).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The QLU-C10D is a fit-for-purpose ready-to-use PBM to estimate health state utilities of patients with cancer. This study adds to evidence that QLU-C10D has appropriate psychometric properties and appears to have higher statistical efficiency than generic PBMs in cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":19807,"journal":{"name":"PharmacoEconomics","volume":" ","pages":"937-953"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12255563/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Cancer-Specific Preference-Based Measure EORTC QLU-C10D against the Generic Instruments EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 in a Prospectively Collected Sample of Patients with Cancer in Austria and France.\",\"authors\":\"Micha J Pilz, Simone Seyringer, Virginie Nerich, Madeleine T King, Richard Norman, Eva M Gamper\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40273-025-01501-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Quality of Life Utility - Core 10 Dimensions (QLU-C10D) is a disease-specific preference-based measure (PBM) designed to obtain health state utility values from patients with cancer. Previously, satisfactory psychometric properties were established from retrospective trial analyses using clinical anchors. This study aimed to validate the QLU-C10D against two generic PBMs in a prospective sample of Austrian and French patients with cancer using patient-reported anchors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients completed the European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (QLQ-C30), EQ-5D-5L and Short Form 36 (SF-36) at study baseline (any time during anti-cancer treatment) plus a follow-up assessment 3-6 months later. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were assessed. QLU-C10D and SF-6Dv2 utilities were calculated from QLQ-C30 and SF-36 data, respectively. German, French and UK value sets were applied for all three PBMs. Floor and ceiling effects were assessed. Known-group validity (independent t-test) and responsiveness (paired t-tests) were assessed respectively by ability to detect health status differences and changes over time according to patient-rated overall quality of life/health perception assessed by the QLQ-C30 Global Health Status scale, the EQ-5D-5L VAS and the SF-36 General Health scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 465 patients were included in the analysis. QLU-C10D index scores (intra-class correlation) and domains (Pearson) were correlated with EQ-5D-5L and Short-Form Six Dimensions (SF-6Dv2) conceptual counterparts. Correlation coefficients for the index scores of QLU-C10D and the generic PBMs ranged from 0.63 to 0.81. The QLU-C10D detected statistically significant differences between groups at baseline in 100% of tests performed (n = 27). For changes over time, QLU-C10D detected expected effects in 68% of cases (n = 29). In comparison with the generic PBMs, QLU-C10D detected differences and changes with a higher statistical efficiency in 76% of cases (77 of 102).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The QLU-C10D is a fit-for-purpose ready-to-use PBM to estimate health state utilities of patients with cancer. This study adds to evidence that QLU-C10D has appropriate psychometric properties and appears to have higher statistical efficiency than generic PBMs in cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PharmacoEconomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"937-953\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12255563/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PharmacoEconomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-025-01501-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmacoEconomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-025-01501-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生活质量效用-核心10个维度(QLU-C10D)是一种基于疾病特异性偏好的测量(PBM),旨在获得癌症患者的健康状态效用值。以前,使用临床锚点的回顾性试验分析建立了令人满意的心理测量特性。本研究旨在验证QLU-C10D在奥地利和法国癌症患者的前瞻性样本中对两种通用PBMs的疗效,使用患者报告的锚点。方法:患者在研究基线(抗癌治疗期间的任何时间)完成欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)生活质量问卷-核心30 (QLQ-C30), EQ-5D-5L和简短表格36 (SF-36),并在3-6个月后进行随访评估。评估社会人口学和临床特征。qu - c10d和SF-6Dv2效用分别由QLQ-C30和SF-36数据计算。德国、法国和英国的价值集应用于所有三种pbm。评估了地板和天花板效应。根据QLQ-C30全球健康状态量表、EQ-5D-5L VAS和SF-36一般健康量表评估患者评定的总体生活质量/健康感知,分别通过检测健康状态差异和随时间变化的能力来评估已知组效度(独立t检验)和响应性(配对t检验)。结果:共纳入465例患者。QLU-C10D指数得分(类内相关)和域(Pearson)与EQ-5D-5L和短形式六维度(SF-6Dv2)概念对应项相关。QLU-C10D指标得分与通用PBMs的相关系数为0.63 ~ 0.81。QLU-C10D在100%的基线测试中检测到组间有统计学显著差异(n = 27)。对于随时间的变化,QLU-C10D在68%的病例中检测到预期的影响(n = 29)。与通用PBMs相比,QLU-C10D在76%的病例(102例中的77例)中以更高的统计效率检测到差异和变化。结论:QLU-C10D是一种适合目的的即用PBM,用于估计癌症患者的健康状态效用。本研究进一步证明,QLU-C10D具有适当的心理测量特性,在癌症治疗中似乎比通用PBMs具有更高的统计效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of the Cancer-Specific Preference-Based Measure EORTC QLU-C10D against the Generic Instruments EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 in a Prospectively Collected Sample of Patients with Cancer in Austria and France.

Background: The Quality of Life Utility - Core 10 Dimensions (QLU-C10D) is a disease-specific preference-based measure (PBM) designed to obtain health state utility values from patients with cancer. Previously, satisfactory psychometric properties were established from retrospective trial analyses using clinical anchors. This study aimed to validate the QLU-C10D against two generic PBMs in a prospective sample of Austrian and French patients with cancer using patient-reported anchors.

Methods: Patients completed the European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (QLQ-C30), EQ-5D-5L and Short Form 36 (SF-36) at study baseline (any time during anti-cancer treatment) plus a follow-up assessment 3-6 months later. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were assessed. QLU-C10D and SF-6Dv2 utilities were calculated from QLQ-C30 and SF-36 data, respectively. German, French and UK value sets were applied for all three PBMs. Floor and ceiling effects were assessed. Known-group validity (independent t-test) and responsiveness (paired t-tests) were assessed respectively by ability to detect health status differences and changes over time according to patient-rated overall quality of life/health perception assessed by the QLQ-C30 Global Health Status scale, the EQ-5D-5L VAS and the SF-36 General Health scale.

Results: A total of 465 patients were included in the analysis. QLU-C10D index scores (intra-class correlation) and domains (Pearson) were correlated with EQ-5D-5L and Short-Form Six Dimensions (SF-6Dv2) conceptual counterparts. Correlation coefficients for the index scores of QLU-C10D and the generic PBMs ranged from 0.63 to 0.81. The QLU-C10D detected statistically significant differences between groups at baseline in 100% of tests performed (n = 27). For changes over time, QLU-C10D detected expected effects in 68% of cases (n = 29). In comparison with the generic PBMs, QLU-C10D detected differences and changes with a higher statistical efficiency in 76% of cases (77 of 102).

Conclusions: The QLU-C10D is a fit-for-purpose ready-to-use PBM to estimate health state utilities of patients with cancer. This study adds to evidence that QLU-C10D has appropriate psychometric properties and appears to have higher statistical efficiency than generic PBMs in cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PharmacoEconomics
PharmacoEconomics 医学-药学
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: PharmacoEconomics is the benchmark journal for peer-reviewed, authoritative and practical articles on the application of pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life assessment to optimum drug therapy and health outcomes. An invaluable source of applied pharmacoeconomic original research and educational material for the healthcare decision maker. PharmacoEconomics is dedicated to the clear communication of complex pharmacoeconomic issues related to patient care and drug utilization. PharmacoEconomics offers a range of additional features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand the scientific content and overall implications of the article.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信