患者和临床医生对全膝关节置换术后个性化康复的“像我一样的人”工具的看法:一项定性访谈研究。

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Laura Churchill, Jeremy Graber, Meredith Mealer, Charles A Thigpen, Dan D Matlock, Michael J Bade, Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley
{"title":"患者和临床医生对全膝关节置换术后个性化康复的“像我一样的人”工具的看法:一项定性访谈研究。","authors":"Laura Churchill, Jeremy Graber, Meredith Mealer, Charles A Thigpen, Dan D Matlock, Michael J Bade, Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley","doi":"10.1093/ptj/pzaf058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The author team developed a decision support tool to help physical therapists address the varied expectations and recoveries of the total knee arthroplasty (TKA) population. The purpose of this study was to explore patients' and clinicians' perceptions and experiences with the tool during rehabilitation after TKA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The tool was piloted in 2 outpatient physical therapy clinics. An in-depth semi-structured interview was conducted with patients who underwent TKA and were exposed to the tool during rehabilitation, and with clinicians who used the tool with patients after TKA. Two members of the research team coded the interview data using a descriptive content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen patients and 10 clinicians were interviewed. Four common themes were identified: (1) expectations: most patients and clinicians felt the tool provided patients with valuable feedback for managing recovery expectations; (2) motivation: patients and clinicians felt the tool motivated patients to participate in rehabilitation by providing positive reinforcement and/or a form of competition; (3) influence on practice: some patients and clinicians indicated that the tool helped guide treatment decisions or provided opportunities for patient education, but most felt it did not influence clinical decision making; and (4) clarity and comprehension: the majority of patients understood the tool's \"take-home\" message, however, some patients and clinicians felt the use of percentiles, line graphs, and medical jargon decreased patients' clarity and comprehension of the tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, participants reported that the tool helped to shape patients' expectations for postoperative recovery and increase patient motivation to participate in rehabilitation. Participants had mixed perceptions on how the tool influenced clinical care. Finally, participants identified some limitations in patient comprehension of the tool, which will inform future revisions to the tool to accommodate varying levels of health literacy.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>A clinical decision support tool that provided individualized projections of TKA recovery was helpful to patients and clinicians during TKA rehabilitation to set expectations and increase patient motivation. Revisions to the tool and how it is implemented may enhance its future utility and potential to impact clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":20093,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient and Clinician Perceptions of a \\\"People-Like-Me\\\" Tool for Personalized Rehabilitation After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Qualitative Interview Study.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Churchill, Jeremy Graber, Meredith Mealer, Charles A Thigpen, Dan D Matlock, Michael J Bade, Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ptj/pzaf058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The author team developed a decision support tool to help physical therapists address the varied expectations and recoveries of the total knee arthroplasty (TKA) population. The purpose of this study was to explore patients' and clinicians' perceptions and experiences with the tool during rehabilitation after TKA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The tool was piloted in 2 outpatient physical therapy clinics. An in-depth semi-structured interview was conducted with patients who underwent TKA and were exposed to the tool during rehabilitation, and with clinicians who used the tool with patients after TKA. Two members of the research team coded the interview data using a descriptive content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen patients and 10 clinicians were interviewed. Four common themes were identified: (1) expectations: most patients and clinicians felt the tool provided patients with valuable feedback for managing recovery expectations; (2) motivation: patients and clinicians felt the tool motivated patients to participate in rehabilitation by providing positive reinforcement and/or a form of competition; (3) influence on practice: some patients and clinicians indicated that the tool helped guide treatment decisions or provided opportunities for patient education, but most felt it did not influence clinical decision making; and (4) clarity and comprehension: the majority of patients understood the tool's \\\"take-home\\\" message, however, some patients and clinicians felt the use of percentiles, line graphs, and medical jargon decreased patients' clarity and comprehension of the tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, participants reported that the tool helped to shape patients' expectations for postoperative recovery and increase patient motivation to participate in rehabilitation. Participants had mixed perceptions on how the tool influenced clinical care. Finally, participants identified some limitations in patient comprehension of the tool, which will inform future revisions to the tool to accommodate varying levels of health literacy.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>A clinical decision support tool that provided individualized projections of TKA recovery was helpful to patients and clinicians during TKA rehabilitation to set expectations and increase patient motivation. Revisions to the tool and how it is implemented may enhance its future utility and potential to impact clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaf058\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaf058","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:作者团队开发了一个决策支持工具,以帮助物理治疗师解决全膝关节置换术(TKA)人群的不同期望和恢复。本研究的目的是探讨患者和临床医生在TKA后康复期间对该工具的看法和经验。方法:在2家门诊物理治疗诊所试用该工具。对接受TKA并在康复期间使用该工具的患者以及在TKA后对患者使用该工具的临床医生进行了深入的半结构化访谈。研究小组的两名成员使用描述性内容分析对访谈数据进行编码。结果:对16例患者和10名临床医生进行了访谈。确定了四个共同主题:(1)期望:大多数患者和临床医生认为该工具为患者提供了管理康复期望的有价值的反馈;(2)动机:患者和临床医生认为该工具通过提供积极的强化和/或一种形式的竞争来激励患者参与康复;(3)对实践的影响:一些患者和临床医生表示,该工具有助于指导治疗决策或为患者提供教育机会,但大多数人认为它没有影响临床决策;(4)清晰度和理解力:大多数患者理解该工具的“带回家”信息,然而,一些患者和临床医生认为百分位数、线形图和医学术语的使用降低了患者对该工具的清晰度和理解力。结论:总体而言,参与者报告该工具有助于塑造患者对术后恢复的期望,并增加患者参与康复的动机。参与者对该工具如何影响临床护理有不同的看法。最后,与会者确定了患者对该工具理解的一些限制,这将为今后对该工具进行修订提供信息,以适应不同水平的卫生知识。影响:临床决策支持工具提供个体化TKA康复预测,有助于患者和临床医生在TKA康复期间设定期望并增加患者动机。对该工具的修订及其实施方式可能会增强其未来的效用和影响临床实践的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient and Clinician Perceptions of a "People-Like-Me" Tool for Personalized Rehabilitation After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Qualitative Interview Study.

Objective: The author team developed a decision support tool to help physical therapists address the varied expectations and recoveries of the total knee arthroplasty (TKA) population. The purpose of this study was to explore patients' and clinicians' perceptions and experiences with the tool during rehabilitation after TKA.

Methods: The tool was piloted in 2 outpatient physical therapy clinics. An in-depth semi-structured interview was conducted with patients who underwent TKA and were exposed to the tool during rehabilitation, and with clinicians who used the tool with patients after TKA. Two members of the research team coded the interview data using a descriptive content analysis.

Results: Sixteen patients and 10 clinicians were interviewed. Four common themes were identified: (1) expectations: most patients and clinicians felt the tool provided patients with valuable feedback for managing recovery expectations; (2) motivation: patients and clinicians felt the tool motivated patients to participate in rehabilitation by providing positive reinforcement and/or a form of competition; (3) influence on practice: some patients and clinicians indicated that the tool helped guide treatment decisions or provided opportunities for patient education, but most felt it did not influence clinical decision making; and (4) clarity and comprehension: the majority of patients understood the tool's "take-home" message, however, some patients and clinicians felt the use of percentiles, line graphs, and medical jargon decreased patients' clarity and comprehension of the tool.

Conclusions: Overall, participants reported that the tool helped to shape patients' expectations for postoperative recovery and increase patient motivation to participate in rehabilitation. Participants had mixed perceptions on how the tool influenced clinical care. Finally, participants identified some limitations in patient comprehension of the tool, which will inform future revisions to the tool to accommodate varying levels of health literacy.

Impact: A clinical decision support tool that provided individualized projections of TKA recovery was helpful to patients and clinicians during TKA rehabilitation to set expectations and increase patient motivation. Revisions to the tool and how it is implemented may enhance its future utility and potential to impact clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Therapy
Physical Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy (PTJ) engages and inspires an international readership on topics related to physical therapy. As the leading international journal for research in physical therapy and related fields, PTJ publishes innovative and highly relevant content for both clinicians and scientists and uses a variety of interactive approaches to communicate that content, with the expressed purpose of improving patient care. PTJ"s circulation in 2008 is more than 72,000. Its 2007 impact factor was 2.152. The mean time from submission to first decision is 58 days. Time from acceptance to publication online is less than or equal to 3 months and from acceptance to publication in print is less than or equal to 5 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信