双向诊所对社区社会关怀转介计划的影响。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Medical Care Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-21 DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000002144
Shari D Bolen, Jonathan Lever, Chris Mundorf, Alvonta Jenkins, Rachel Waitzman, Samantha Smith, Matthew Finley, Joseph Daprano, Eva Johnson, Marie Masotya, Shivani Joshi, Anandhi Gunder, Melissa E Lohr, David Bar-Shain, David C Kaelber, Tatyana Khaled, Dieter Sumerauer, Heidi Gullet, Kurt C Stange
{"title":"双向诊所对社区社会关怀转介计划的影响。","authors":"Shari D Bolen, Jonathan Lever, Chris Mundorf, Alvonta Jenkins, Rachel Waitzman, Samantha Smith, Matthew Finley, Joseph Daprano, Eva Johnson, Marie Masotya, Shivani Joshi, Anandhi Gunder, Melissa E Lohr, David Bar-Shain, David C Kaelber, Tatyana Khaled, Dieter Sumerauer, Heidi Gullet, Kurt C Stange","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Practical knowledge of how to address patients' social needs could have a large health impact.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Describe a scalable electronic health record (EHR)-facilitated, clinic-to-community linkage (CCL) program that addresses social needs at 6 clinics in 4 health systems.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>Primary care teams referred eligible patients to United Way 211 (UW 211) via a point-of-care EHR referral between 2018 and 2023. Patients were eligible if they were adults with uncontrolled blood pressure or blood sugar or 2-17 years old with overweight/obesity or asthma. UW 211 referred patients to assess and connect them with community resources and provided electronic feedback to the EHR. We conducted descriptive analyses of process measures (eg, patients referred, needs identified, need resolution). We then conducted pre-post analyses of selected health outcomes (ie, blood pressure, weight, and asthma exacerbations) versus comparison clinics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Referral ranges varied by clinic from 3% to 43%, with 1224 total patients referred and 38% (n=461) reached by UW 211. All 461 had at least one need, and 87% (n=400) had one need resolved or a resolution in progress. Reached patients had an average of 2.9 (SD 1.3) needs and an average of 10.1 resource referrals provided (SD 6.1). Top needs included food, physical activity, housing and utilities. No differences were found pre to post within the intervention clinics except for improvements in blood pressure control. However, comparison clinics had greater improvements in blood pressure control during the same time frame.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An EHR-facilitated, closed-loop CCL program to address patients' social needs is feasible. Further research on the comparative effectiveness and sustainability of models to address social needs will be critical in advancing health equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":18364,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care","volume":"63 6","pages":"449-457"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of a Bidirectional Clinic to Community Social Care Referral Program.\",\"authors\":\"Shari D Bolen, Jonathan Lever, Chris Mundorf, Alvonta Jenkins, Rachel Waitzman, Samantha Smith, Matthew Finley, Joseph Daprano, Eva Johnson, Marie Masotya, Shivani Joshi, Anandhi Gunder, Melissa E Lohr, David Bar-Shain, David C Kaelber, Tatyana Khaled, Dieter Sumerauer, Heidi Gullet, Kurt C Stange\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Practical knowledge of how to address patients' social needs could have a large health impact.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Describe a scalable electronic health record (EHR)-facilitated, clinic-to-community linkage (CCL) program that addresses social needs at 6 clinics in 4 health systems.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>Primary care teams referred eligible patients to United Way 211 (UW 211) via a point-of-care EHR referral between 2018 and 2023. Patients were eligible if they were adults with uncontrolled blood pressure or blood sugar or 2-17 years old with overweight/obesity or asthma. UW 211 referred patients to assess and connect them with community resources and provided electronic feedback to the EHR. We conducted descriptive analyses of process measures (eg, patients referred, needs identified, need resolution). We then conducted pre-post analyses of selected health outcomes (ie, blood pressure, weight, and asthma exacerbations) versus comparison clinics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Referral ranges varied by clinic from 3% to 43%, with 1224 total patients referred and 38% (n=461) reached by UW 211. All 461 had at least one need, and 87% (n=400) had one need resolved or a resolution in progress. Reached patients had an average of 2.9 (SD 1.3) needs and an average of 10.1 resource referrals provided (SD 6.1). Top needs included food, physical activity, housing and utilities. No differences were found pre to post within the intervention clinics except for improvements in blood pressure control. However, comparison clinics had greater improvements in blood pressure control during the same time frame.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An EHR-facilitated, closed-loop CCL program to address patients' social needs is feasible. Further research on the comparative effectiveness and sustainability of models to address social needs will be critical in advancing health equity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Care\",\"volume\":\"63 6\",\"pages\":\"449-457\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002144\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002144","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:如何解决患者的社会需求的实用知识可能有很大的健康影响。目的:描述一个可扩展的电子健康记录(EHR)促进的诊所-社区联系(CCL)计划,该计划解决了4个卫生系统中6个诊所的社会需求。研究设计:初级保健团队在2018年至2023年期间通过医疗点EHR转诊将符合条件的患者转介到联合劝募211 (UW 211)。如果患者是血压或血糖不受控制的成年人或2-17岁超重/肥胖或哮喘患者,则符合条件。UW 211转介病人评估并将他们与社区资源联系起来,并向电子病历提供电子反馈。我们对过程测量进行了描述性分析(例如,转诊的患者、需求识别、需求解决)。然后,我们对选定的健康结果(即血压、体重和哮喘恶化)与比较诊所进行了前后分析。结果:转诊范围因诊所而异,从3%到43%不等,共有1224例患者转诊,uw211达到38% (n=461)。所有461人至少有一种需求,87% (n=400)的人有一种需求得到解决或正在解决。达到目标的患者平均有2.9个(SD 1.3)需求,平均提供10.1个资源转诊(SD 6.1)。最重要的需求包括食物、体育活动、住房和公用事业。除了血压控制的改善外,在干预诊所内,前后没有发现任何差异。然而,在同一时间段内,比较诊所在血压控制方面有更大的改善。结论:采用电子病历辅助的闭环CCL方案来解决患者的社会需求是可行的。进一步研究解决社会需要的模式的相对有效性和可持续性,对于促进卫生公平至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of a Bidirectional Clinic to Community Social Care Referral Program.

Background: Practical knowledge of how to address patients' social needs could have a large health impact.

Objective: Describe a scalable electronic health record (EHR)-facilitated, clinic-to-community linkage (CCL) program that addresses social needs at 6 clinics in 4 health systems.

Research design: Primary care teams referred eligible patients to United Way 211 (UW 211) via a point-of-care EHR referral between 2018 and 2023. Patients were eligible if they were adults with uncontrolled blood pressure or blood sugar or 2-17 years old with overweight/obesity or asthma. UW 211 referred patients to assess and connect them with community resources and provided electronic feedback to the EHR. We conducted descriptive analyses of process measures (eg, patients referred, needs identified, need resolution). We then conducted pre-post analyses of selected health outcomes (ie, blood pressure, weight, and asthma exacerbations) versus comparison clinics.

Results: Referral ranges varied by clinic from 3% to 43%, with 1224 total patients referred and 38% (n=461) reached by UW 211. All 461 had at least one need, and 87% (n=400) had one need resolved or a resolution in progress. Reached patients had an average of 2.9 (SD 1.3) needs and an average of 10.1 resource referrals provided (SD 6.1). Top needs included food, physical activity, housing and utilities. No differences were found pre to post within the intervention clinics except for improvements in blood pressure control. However, comparison clinics had greater improvements in blood pressure control during the same time frame.

Conclusions: An EHR-facilitated, closed-loop CCL program to address patients' social needs is feasible. Further research on the comparative effectiveness and sustainability of models to address social needs will be critical in advancing health equity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Care
Medical Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
228
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. This timely journal reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信