Helen Frost, Tricia R Tooman, Bruce Mason, Eddie Donaghy, Katie Hawkins, Sue Lewis, Maria Wolters, Stewart W Mercer
{"title":"苏格兰全科医生对绿色社会处方的看法:一项全国性横断面调查的分析。","authors":"Helen Frost, Tricia R Tooman, Bruce Mason, Eddie Donaghy, Katie Hawkins, Sue Lewis, Maria Wolters, Stewart W Mercer","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Green social prescribing (GSP) aims to link patients to nature-based health interventions (NBHIs) through GPs. However, knowledge of GPs' views on GSP is limited.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore GPs' views on GSP and the factors influencing these views.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>National cross-sectional survey of GPs' working lives in Scotland, conducted in 2023, which included four questions about GSP.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Descriptive analysis of GPs' views of GSP and univariate and multivariate (binary logistic) analysis of factors influencing these views.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey found 79.6% (<i>n</i> = 1098) of GPs had heard of GSP, 81.3% (<i>n</i> = 1106) would be happy to refer patients to NBHIs, 67.8% (<i>n</i> = 931) thought GSP was suitable for older patients with multimorbidity, and 43.7% (<i>n</i> = 599) felt that patients living in deprived areas would access GSP. Greater knowledge of GSP was associated with White ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.30 to 3.22, <i>P</i> = 0.002) and the number of clinical sessions worked per week (aOR 0.90; 95% CI = 0.82 to 0.99, <i>P</i> = 0.034). Higher job satisfaction was associated with more positive views about the suitability of GSP for older patients with multimorbidity (aOR 1.14; 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.30; <i>P</i> = 0.043) as were views on whether patients living in deprived areas would access GSP (aOR 1.20; 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.33, <i>P</i> = 0.013). GPs working in deprived areas also had more positive views regarding whether patients living in deprived areas would access GSP (aOR 1.24; 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.45, <i>P</i> = 0.159).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GPs in Scotland are aware of and willing to refer to GSP but have concerns about accessibility for patients from deprived areas. Views were influenced by personal and practice characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GPs' views on green social prescribing in Scotland: analysis of a national cross-sectional survey.\",\"authors\":\"Helen Frost, Tricia R Tooman, Bruce Mason, Eddie Donaghy, Katie Hawkins, Sue Lewis, Maria Wolters, Stewart W Mercer\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Green social prescribing (GSP) aims to link patients to nature-based health interventions (NBHIs) through GPs. However, knowledge of GPs' views on GSP is limited.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore GPs' views on GSP and the factors influencing these views.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>National cross-sectional survey of GPs' working lives in Scotland, conducted in 2023, which included four questions about GSP.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Descriptive analysis of GPs' views of GSP and univariate and multivariate (binary logistic) analysis of factors influencing these views.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey found 79.6% (<i>n</i> = 1098) of GPs had heard of GSP, 81.3% (<i>n</i> = 1106) would be happy to refer patients to NBHIs, 67.8% (<i>n</i> = 931) thought GSP was suitable for older patients with multimorbidity, and 43.7% (<i>n</i> = 599) felt that patients living in deprived areas would access GSP. Greater knowledge of GSP was associated with White ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.30 to 3.22, <i>P</i> = 0.002) and the number of clinical sessions worked per week (aOR 0.90; 95% CI = 0.82 to 0.99, <i>P</i> = 0.034). Higher job satisfaction was associated with more positive views about the suitability of GSP for older patients with multimorbidity (aOR 1.14; 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.30; <i>P</i> = 0.043) as were views on whether patients living in deprived areas would access GSP (aOR 1.20; 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.33, <i>P</i> = 0.013). GPs working in deprived areas also had more positive views regarding whether patients living in deprived areas would access GSP (aOR 1.24; 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.45, <i>P</i> = 0.159).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GPs in Scotland are aware of and willing to refer to GSP but have concerns about accessibility for patients from deprived areas. Views were influenced by personal and practice characteristics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJGP Open\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJGP Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0259\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:绿色社会处方(GSP)旨在通过全科医生(gp)将患者与基于自然的健康干预(NBHIs)联系起来。然而,对普通医生对普惠制的看法了解有限。目的:探讨全科医生对普惠制的看法及其影响因素。设计与设置:对苏格兰全科医生工作生活的全国性横断面调查,于2023年进行,其中包括四个关于普惠制的问题。方法:描述性分析全科医生对GSP的看法,并对影响这些看法的因素进行单因素和多因素(二元logistic)分析。结果:80% (n=1098)的全科医生听说过GSP, 81% (n=1160)的全科医生愿意将患者转介到NBHIs, 68% (n=931)的全科医生认为GSP适用于老年多病患者,44% (n=599)的全科医生认为生活在贫困地区的患者可以使用GSP。对GSP了解程度高与白人相关(aOR 2.04;CI 1.30-3.22, P=0.002)和每周临床工作次数(aOR 0.90;Ci 0.82-0.99, p =0.034)。较高的工作满意度与对老年多病患者GSP适用性的更积极看法相关(aOR 1.14 CI 1.00-1.30;P=0.043),生活在贫困地区的患者是否会获得GSP (aOR 1.20;Ci 1.06-1.45, p =0.013)。在贫困地区工作的全科医生对贫困地区患者是否获得GSP (aOR 1.24;Ci 1.06-1.45, p =0.008)。结论:苏格兰的全科医生意识到并愿意参考GSP,但对贫困地区患者的可及性存在担忧。观点受到个人和实践特点的影响。
GPs' views on green social prescribing in Scotland: analysis of a national cross-sectional survey.
Background: Green social prescribing (GSP) aims to link patients to nature-based health interventions (NBHIs) through GPs. However, knowledge of GPs' views on GSP is limited.
Aim: To explore GPs' views on GSP and the factors influencing these views.
Design & setting: National cross-sectional survey of GPs' working lives in Scotland, conducted in 2023, which included four questions about GSP.
Method: Descriptive analysis of GPs' views of GSP and univariate and multivariate (binary logistic) analysis of factors influencing these views.
Results: The survey found 79.6% (n = 1098) of GPs had heard of GSP, 81.3% (n = 1106) would be happy to refer patients to NBHIs, 67.8% (n = 931) thought GSP was suitable for older patients with multimorbidity, and 43.7% (n = 599) felt that patients living in deprived areas would access GSP. Greater knowledge of GSP was associated with White ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.30 to 3.22, P = 0.002) and the number of clinical sessions worked per week (aOR 0.90; 95% CI = 0.82 to 0.99, P = 0.034). Higher job satisfaction was associated with more positive views about the suitability of GSP for older patients with multimorbidity (aOR 1.14; 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.30; P = 0.043) as were views on whether patients living in deprived areas would access GSP (aOR 1.20; 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.33, P = 0.013). GPs working in deprived areas also had more positive views regarding whether patients living in deprived areas would access GSP (aOR 1.24; 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.45, P = 0.159).
Conclusion: GPs in Scotland are aware of and willing to refer to GSP but have concerns about accessibility for patients from deprived areas. Views were influenced by personal and practice characteristics.