加拿大妇女同时参与癌症筛查及相关因素:来自横断面研究的见解

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kazeem Adefemi, John C Knight, Yun Zhu, Peizhong Peter Wang
{"title":"加拿大妇女同时参与癌症筛查及相关因素:来自横断面研究的见解","authors":"Kazeem Adefemi, John C Knight, Yun Zhu, Peizhong Peter Wang","doi":"10.1177/09691413251333223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesColorectal, breast, and cervical cancers are leading causes of morbidity and mortality among Canadian women. While organized screening programs aim to reduce this burden, participation rates remain suboptimal, particularly for colorectal cancer screening. This study examined factors associated with colorectal cancer screening uptake among women participating in breast and cervical cancer screening ('screen-aware\" women), investigated patterns of concurrent participation across all three programs, and identified associated factors.MethodsCross-sectional data from the 2017 Canadian Community Health Survey were analyzed for women aged 50-69 eligible for breast cancer (mammography), cervical cancer (Pap smear), and colorectal cancer (fecal and/or endoscopy tests) screening (<i>n</i> = 10,426). Multivariable logistic regression evaluated factors associated with colorectal cancer screening among \"screen-aware\" women. Multinomial logistic regression assessed factors related to full (all three), partial (any two), single, or non-participation across screening programs, using \"no screening\" as the reference.ResultsAlthough the majority of women (87%) participated in at least one screening program, only 27% reported full participation. Colorectal cancer screening (53.7%) lagged behind breast and cervical cancer screening (∼64%). Among \"screen-aware\" women, older age (adjusted odds ratio 1.50, 95% confidence interval 1.31-1.71), higher income, self-rated health as \"great\" (adjusted odds ratio 1.31, 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.63), and having a regular healthcare provider (adjusted odds ratio 3.29, 95% confidence interval 2.45-4.40) were associated with higher colorectal cancer screening participation. Having multiple chronic conditions reduced colorectal cancer screening likelihood (adjusted odds ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.55-0.94). Higher income, self-rated health, having a regular healthcare provider, and physical activity increased the odds of full screening participation, while smoking and Asian identity reduced the odds.ConclusionsColorectal cancer screening uptake remains low among Canadian women, even those participating in other cancer screenings. Socioeconomic, health-related, and systemic factors influence concurrent screening participation. Tailored interventions addressing identified barriers and promoting equitable access to screening are crucial for improving cancer prevention efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":51089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Screening","volume":" ","pages":"9691413251333223"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concurrent cancer screening participation and associated factors among Canadian women: Insights from a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Kazeem Adefemi, John C Knight, Yun Zhu, Peizhong Peter Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09691413251333223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectivesColorectal, breast, and cervical cancers are leading causes of morbidity and mortality among Canadian women. While organized screening programs aim to reduce this burden, participation rates remain suboptimal, particularly for colorectal cancer screening. This study examined factors associated with colorectal cancer screening uptake among women participating in breast and cervical cancer screening ('screen-aware\\\" women), investigated patterns of concurrent participation across all three programs, and identified associated factors.MethodsCross-sectional data from the 2017 Canadian Community Health Survey were analyzed for women aged 50-69 eligible for breast cancer (mammography), cervical cancer (Pap smear), and colorectal cancer (fecal and/or endoscopy tests) screening (<i>n</i> = 10,426). Multivariable logistic regression evaluated factors associated with colorectal cancer screening among \\\"screen-aware\\\" women. Multinomial logistic regression assessed factors related to full (all three), partial (any two), single, or non-participation across screening programs, using \\\"no screening\\\" as the reference.ResultsAlthough the majority of women (87%) participated in at least one screening program, only 27% reported full participation. Colorectal cancer screening (53.7%) lagged behind breast and cervical cancer screening (∼64%). Among \\\"screen-aware\\\" women, older age (adjusted odds ratio 1.50, 95% confidence interval 1.31-1.71), higher income, self-rated health as \\\"great\\\" (adjusted odds ratio 1.31, 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.63), and having a regular healthcare provider (adjusted odds ratio 3.29, 95% confidence interval 2.45-4.40) were associated with higher colorectal cancer screening participation. Having multiple chronic conditions reduced colorectal cancer screening likelihood (adjusted odds ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.55-0.94). Higher income, self-rated health, having a regular healthcare provider, and physical activity increased the odds of full screening participation, while smoking and Asian identity reduced the odds.ConclusionsColorectal cancer screening uptake remains low among Canadian women, even those participating in other cancer screenings. Socioeconomic, health-related, and systemic factors influence concurrent screening participation. Tailored interventions addressing identified barriers and promoting equitable access to screening are crucial for improving cancer prevention efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Screening\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9691413251333223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Screening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413251333223\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Screening","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413251333223","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的结直肠癌、乳腺癌和宫颈癌是加拿大妇女发病和死亡的主要原因。虽然有组织的筛查项目旨在减轻这一负担,但参与率仍然不理想,尤其是结肠直肠癌筛查。本研究调查了参与乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的女性(“有筛查意识”的女性)接受结直肠癌筛查的相关因素,调查了所有三个项目同时参与的模式,并确定了相关因素。方法分析2017年加拿大社区健康调查中50-69岁符合乳腺癌(乳房x光检查)、宫颈癌(巴氏涂片检查)和结直肠癌(粪便和/或内窥镜检查)筛查条件的女性(n = 10,426)的横断面数据。多变量logistic回归评估了在“有筛查意识”的女性中与结直肠癌筛查相关的因素。多项逻辑回归以“无筛查”作为参考,评估了与筛查项目中全部(全部三项)、部分(任意两项)、单一或不参与相关的因素。结果尽管大多数女性(87%)至少参加了一次筛查项目,但只有27%的人表示完全参与。结直肠癌筛查(53.7%)落后于乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查(约64%)。在“有筛查意识”的女性中,年龄较大(调整优势比1.50,95%置信区间1.31-1.71)、收入较高、自认为健康状况“良好”(调整优势比1.31,95%置信区间1.05-1.63)、有定期医疗保健提供者(调整优势比3.29,95%置信区间2.45-4.40)与较高的结直肠癌筛查参与率相关。患有多种慢性疾病降低了结直肠癌筛查的可能性(校正优势比0.72,95%置信区间0.55-0.94)。较高的收入、自我评估的健康状况、有定期的医疗保健提供者和体育锻炼增加了参与全面筛查的几率,而吸烟和亚裔身份则降低了这一几率。结论:加拿大妇女的结直肠癌筛查率仍然很低,即使是参加其他癌症筛查的妇女也是如此。社会经济、健康相关和系统因素影响同时参与筛查。针对已发现的障碍和促进公平获得筛查的量身定制的干预措施对于改善癌症预防工作至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Concurrent cancer screening participation and associated factors among Canadian women: Insights from a cross-sectional study.

ObjectivesColorectal, breast, and cervical cancers are leading causes of morbidity and mortality among Canadian women. While organized screening programs aim to reduce this burden, participation rates remain suboptimal, particularly for colorectal cancer screening. This study examined factors associated with colorectal cancer screening uptake among women participating in breast and cervical cancer screening ('screen-aware" women), investigated patterns of concurrent participation across all three programs, and identified associated factors.MethodsCross-sectional data from the 2017 Canadian Community Health Survey were analyzed for women aged 50-69 eligible for breast cancer (mammography), cervical cancer (Pap smear), and colorectal cancer (fecal and/or endoscopy tests) screening (n = 10,426). Multivariable logistic regression evaluated factors associated with colorectal cancer screening among "screen-aware" women. Multinomial logistic regression assessed factors related to full (all three), partial (any two), single, or non-participation across screening programs, using "no screening" as the reference.ResultsAlthough the majority of women (87%) participated in at least one screening program, only 27% reported full participation. Colorectal cancer screening (53.7%) lagged behind breast and cervical cancer screening (∼64%). Among "screen-aware" women, older age (adjusted odds ratio 1.50, 95% confidence interval 1.31-1.71), higher income, self-rated health as "great" (adjusted odds ratio 1.31, 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.63), and having a regular healthcare provider (adjusted odds ratio 3.29, 95% confidence interval 2.45-4.40) were associated with higher colorectal cancer screening participation. Having multiple chronic conditions reduced colorectal cancer screening likelihood (adjusted odds ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.55-0.94). Higher income, self-rated health, having a regular healthcare provider, and physical activity increased the odds of full screening participation, while smoking and Asian identity reduced the odds.ConclusionsColorectal cancer screening uptake remains low among Canadian women, even those participating in other cancer screenings. Socioeconomic, health-related, and systemic factors influence concurrent screening participation. Tailored interventions addressing identified barriers and promoting equitable access to screening are crucial for improving cancer prevention efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Screening
Journal of Medical Screening 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Screening, a fully peer reviewed journal, is concerned with all aspects of medical screening, particularly the publication of research that advances screening theory and practice. The journal aims to increase awareness of the principles of screening (quantitative and statistical aspects), screening techniques and procedures and methodologies from all specialties. An essential subscription for physicians, clinicians and academics with an interest in screening, epidemiology and public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信