癌症患者对远程医疗或面对面姑息治疗的偏好相关因素

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Min Ji Kim, Michael Tang, Terry Taylor, Minxing Chen, David Hui, Akhila Reddy, Santhosshi Narayanan, Eduardo Bruera
{"title":"癌症患者对远程医疗或面对面姑息治疗的偏好相关因素","authors":"Min Ji Kim, Michael Tang, Terry Taylor, Minxing Chen, David Hui, Akhila Reddy, Santhosshi Narayanan, Eduardo Bruera","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Prior studies demonstrate sociodemographic factors as barriers to telemedicine. Greater understanding of telemedicine preferences in cancer patients receiving palliative care and factors associated with their preferences could inform future care delivery in this vulnerable population.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to identify cancer patients' preferences for in-person versus telemedicine palliative care visits in real-world clinical practice and associated patient-centric factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study involving chart review of in-person or telemedicine palliative care visits between September 2021 and October 2021, during which patients' preferences for telemedicine or in-person visits and perceived difficulty coming in-person were routinely asked. Their answers were collected from the electronic chart. Associations between visit preference and sociodemographic and clinical factors were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 400 patients, mean age was 59 years. 217 (54%) were female. 285 (71%) were White. Most had advanced cancer (344; 86%). 83% (n=333) preferred telemedicine. 72% (n=288) cited difficulty coming in-person. On univariate analysis, female gender (p=0.03), college completion (p<0.01), and perceived difficulty coming in-person (p<0.01) were associated with preferring telemedicine. Positive Cut-Down, Annoyed, Guilty, Eye-Opener-Adapted to Include Drugs (CAGE-AID) score (p=0.02) was associated with in-person preference. On multivariate analyses, perceived difficulty coming in-person was associated with telemedicine preference (OR: 16.81; 95% CI: 7.91-35.28; p<0.01). A positive CAGE-AID score was associated with in-person preference (OR: 0.17; 95% CI: 0.05-0.59; p=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most patients having outpatient palliative care visits preferred telemedicine. Perceived difficulty coming in-person was associated with telemedicine preference. Patients with positive CAGE-AID scores were less likely to prefer telemedicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Associated with Cancer Patients' Preferences for Telemedicine or In-Person Palliative Care.\",\"authors\":\"Min Ji Kim, Michael Tang, Terry Taylor, Minxing Chen, David Hui, Akhila Reddy, Santhosshi Narayanan, Eduardo Bruera\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.05.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Prior studies demonstrate sociodemographic factors as barriers to telemedicine. Greater understanding of telemedicine preferences in cancer patients receiving palliative care and factors associated with their preferences could inform future care delivery in this vulnerable population.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to identify cancer patients' preferences for in-person versus telemedicine palliative care visits in real-world clinical practice and associated patient-centric factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study involving chart review of in-person or telemedicine palliative care visits between September 2021 and October 2021, during which patients' preferences for telemedicine or in-person visits and perceived difficulty coming in-person were routinely asked. Their answers were collected from the electronic chart. Associations between visit preference and sociodemographic and clinical factors were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 400 patients, mean age was 59 years. 217 (54%) were female. 285 (71%) were White. Most had advanced cancer (344; 86%). 83% (n=333) preferred telemedicine. 72% (n=288) cited difficulty coming in-person. On univariate analysis, female gender (p=0.03), college completion (p<0.01), and perceived difficulty coming in-person (p<0.01) were associated with preferring telemedicine. Positive Cut-Down, Annoyed, Guilty, Eye-Opener-Adapted to Include Drugs (CAGE-AID) score (p=0.02) was associated with in-person preference. On multivariate analyses, perceived difficulty coming in-person was associated with telemedicine preference (OR: 16.81; 95% CI: 7.91-35.28; p<0.01). A positive CAGE-AID score was associated with in-person preference (OR: 0.17; 95% CI: 0.05-0.59; p=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most patients having outpatient palliative care visits preferred telemedicine. Perceived difficulty coming in-person was associated with telemedicine preference. Patients with positive CAGE-AID scores were less likely to prefer telemedicine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.05.002\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.05.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:先前的研究表明,社会人口因素是远程医疗的障碍。更好地了解接受姑息治疗的癌症患者的远程医疗偏好以及与他们偏好相关的因素,可以为这一弱势群体的未来护理提供信息。目的:本研究旨在确定现实世界临床实践中癌症患者对面对面与远程医疗姑息治疗就诊的偏好以及相关的以患者为中心的因素。方法:这是一项回顾性研究,涉及2021年9月至2021年10月期间面对面或远程医疗姑息治疗就诊的图表回顾,在此期间,定期询问患者对远程医疗或面对面就诊的偏好以及当面就诊的感知困难。他们的答案是从电子图表中收集来的。确定了就诊偏好与社会人口学和临床因素之间的关联。结果:400例患者,平均年龄59岁。217例(54%)为女性。285例(71%)为白人。大多数为晚期癌症(344例;86%)。83% (n=333)倾向于远程医疗。72% (n=288)的受访者表示难以亲自前往。单变量分析:女性性别(p=0.03)、大学毕业程度(p=0.03)。结论:大多数门诊姑息治疗患者倾向于远程医疗。感知到的亲临困难与远程医疗偏好有关。CAGE-AID评分为阳性的患者不太可能选择远程医疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors Associated with Cancer Patients' Preferences for Telemedicine or In-Person Palliative Care.

Context: Prior studies demonstrate sociodemographic factors as barriers to telemedicine. Greater understanding of telemedicine preferences in cancer patients receiving palliative care and factors associated with their preferences could inform future care delivery in this vulnerable population.

Objectives: This study aimed to identify cancer patients' preferences for in-person versus telemedicine palliative care visits in real-world clinical practice and associated patient-centric factors.

Methods: This was a retrospective study involving chart review of in-person or telemedicine palliative care visits between September 2021 and October 2021, during which patients' preferences for telemedicine or in-person visits and perceived difficulty coming in-person were routinely asked. Their answers were collected from the electronic chart. Associations between visit preference and sociodemographic and clinical factors were identified.

Results: Of 400 patients, mean age was 59 years. 217 (54%) were female. 285 (71%) were White. Most had advanced cancer (344; 86%). 83% (n=333) preferred telemedicine. 72% (n=288) cited difficulty coming in-person. On univariate analysis, female gender (p=0.03), college completion (p<0.01), and perceived difficulty coming in-person (p<0.01) were associated with preferring telemedicine. Positive Cut-Down, Annoyed, Guilty, Eye-Opener-Adapted to Include Drugs (CAGE-AID) score (p=0.02) was associated with in-person preference. On multivariate analyses, perceived difficulty coming in-person was associated with telemedicine preference (OR: 16.81; 95% CI: 7.91-35.28; p<0.01). A positive CAGE-AID score was associated with in-person preference (OR: 0.17; 95% CI: 0.05-0.59; p=0.01).

Conclusion: Most patients having outpatient palliative care visits preferred telemedicine. Perceived difficulty coming in-person was associated with telemedicine preference. Patients with positive CAGE-AID scores were less likely to prefer telemedicine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信