在质量项目中应用群体决策模型以提高用药安全。

IF 0.8 Q4 NURSING
Rosana Aparecida Pereira, Fernanda Raphael Escobar Gimenes
{"title":"在质量项目中应用群体决策模型以提高用药安全。","authors":"Rosana Aparecida Pereira, Fernanda Raphael Escobar Gimenes","doi":"10.5152/FNJN.2025.23269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess whether adherence to decisions made by professionals involved in the preparation and administration of orally administered medications via short-term enteral access could be enhanced through the implementation of a Group Decision-Making Model within a quality improvement program, comparing the third Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle with the fourth Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle with the Group Decision-Making Model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study outlines a quantitative research approach using the Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) model. The study was conducted between June 2018 and April 2019. A total of 16 nurses and 40 nursing assistants/technicians were working in the clinical medical ward at the moment of data collection. Group Decision-Making Model in conjunction with the PDSA cycle, as part of the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle within a hospital in the State of São Paulo, Brazil, for supporting the hospital's nursing team in the preparation and administration of oral medicines via enteral access device for short-term use, including the washing of the equipment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings, when compared to a prior Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle conducted without any involvement in decision-making, indicated that utilizing the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle in conjunction with the Group Decision-Making Model method significantly improved the likelihood of successful implementation of quality improvement practices. This was especially noticeable in the case of the pill-crushing technique, where compliance increased from 5.3% in the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle without the Group Decision Making Model to 100% in the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle with the Group Decision-Making Model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle serves as a supportive tool for the management team. Nevertheless, its effectiveness may be constrained when final decisions follow a top-down approach. The incorporation of a participatory phase using the Group Decision-Making Model has demonstrated substantial potential to enhance the prospects of successfully implementing quality improvement practices regarding the preparation and administration of oral medications through enteral access device for short-term use.</p>","PeriodicalId":73033,"journal":{"name":"Florence Nightingale journal of nursing","volume":"33 ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046136/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying a Group Decision-Making Model within a Quality Program to Improve Medication Safety.\",\"authors\":\"Rosana Aparecida Pereira, Fernanda Raphael Escobar Gimenes\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/FNJN.2025.23269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess whether adherence to decisions made by professionals involved in the preparation and administration of orally administered medications via short-term enteral access could be enhanced through the implementation of a Group Decision-Making Model within a quality improvement program, comparing the third Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle with the fourth Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle with the Group Decision-Making Model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study outlines a quantitative research approach using the Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) model. The study was conducted between June 2018 and April 2019. A total of 16 nurses and 40 nursing assistants/technicians were working in the clinical medical ward at the moment of data collection. Group Decision-Making Model in conjunction with the PDSA cycle, as part of the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle within a hospital in the State of São Paulo, Brazil, for supporting the hospital's nursing team in the preparation and administration of oral medicines via enteral access device for short-term use, including the washing of the equipment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings, when compared to a prior Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle conducted without any involvement in decision-making, indicated that utilizing the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle in conjunction with the Group Decision-Making Model method significantly improved the likelihood of successful implementation of quality improvement practices. This was especially noticeable in the case of the pill-crushing technique, where compliance increased from 5.3% in the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle without the Group Decision Making Model to 100% in the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle with the Group Decision-Making Model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle serves as a supportive tool for the management team. Nevertheless, its effectiveness may be constrained when final decisions follow a top-down approach. The incorporation of a participatory phase using the Group Decision-Making Model has demonstrated substantial potential to enhance the prospects of successfully implementing quality improvement practices regarding the preparation and administration of oral medications through enteral access device for short-term use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Florence Nightingale journal of nursing\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046136/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Florence Nightingale journal of nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/FNJN.2025.23269\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Florence Nightingale journal of nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/FNJN.2025.23269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过在质量改进项目中实施小组决策模型,比较第三个计划-做-研究-行动周期和第四个计划-做-研究-行动周期与小组决策模型,评估参与短期肠内口服药物制备和给药的专业人员对决策的依从性。方法:本研究概述了使用质量改进报告卓越标准(SQUIRE)模型的定量研究方法。该研究于2018年6月至2019年4月进行。在数据收集时,共有16名护士和40名护理助理/技术人员在临床病房工作。作为巴西圣保罗州一家医院“计划-做-研究-行动”周期的一部分,与PDSA周期相结合的群体决策模式,用于支持医院护理团队通过短期使用的肠内注射装置制备和给药,包括设备的清洗。结果:与之前在没有任何决策参与的情况下进行的计划-执行-研究-行动周期相比,研究结果表明,利用计划-执行-研究-行动周期与群体决策模型方法相结合,显著提高了成功实施质量改进实践的可能性。这一点在药物粉碎技术的案例中尤为明显,在没有群体决策模型的计划-执行-研究-行动周期中,依从性从5.3%增加到有群体决策模型的计划-执行-研究-行动周期中的100%。结论:计划-执行-研究-行动循环是管理团队的支持工具。然而,当最终决定遵循自上而下的方法时,其有效性可能受到限制。采用群体决策模型的参与阶段已显示出巨大的潜力,可以提高通过短期使用的肠内通路装置制备和给药的质量改进实践的成功实施前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Applying a Group Decision-Making Model within a Quality Program to Improve Medication Safety.

Applying a Group Decision-Making Model within a Quality Program to Improve Medication Safety.

Applying a Group Decision-Making Model within a Quality Program to Improve Medication Safety.

Applying a Group Decision-Making Model within a Quality Program to Improve Medication Safety.

Aim: To assess whether adherence to decisions made by professionals involved in the preparation and administration of orally administered medications via short-term enteral access could be enhanced through the implementation of a Group Decision-Making Model within a quality improvement program, comparing the third Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle with the fourth Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle with the Group Decision-Making Model.

Methods: This study outlines a quantitative research approach using the Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) model. The study was conducted between June 2018 and April 2019. A total of 16 nurses and 40 nursing assistants/technicians were working in the clinical medical ward at the moment of data collection. Group Decision-Making Model in conjunction with the PDSA cycle, as part of the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle within a hospital in the State of São Paulo, Brazil, for supporting the hospital's nursing team in the preparation and administration of oral medicines via enteral access device for short-term use, including the washing of the equipment.

Results: The findings, when compared to a prior Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle conducted without any involvement in decision-making, indicated that utilizing the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle in conjunction with the Group Decision-Making Model method significantly improved the likelihood of successful implementation of quality improvement practices. This was especially noticeable in the case of the pill-crushing technique, where compliance increased from 5.3% in the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle without the Group Decision Making Model to 100% in the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle with the Group Decision-Making Model.

Conclusion: The Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle serves as a supportive tool for the management team. Nevertheless, its effectiveness may be constrained when final decisions follow a top-down approach. The incorporation of a participatory phase using the Group Decision-Making Model has demonstrated substantial potential to enhance the prospects of successfully implementing quality improvement practices regarding the preparation and administration of oral medications through enteral access device for short-term use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信