脑震荡后重返工作岗位的支持因素和挑战:范围审查。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Maryam Shahzad, Joyce Lo, Beatrice Yuen, Andrea Duncan, Nick Reed, Behdin Nowrouzi-Kia
{"title":"脑震荡后重返工作岗位的支持因素和挑战:范围审查。","authors":"Maryam Shahzad, Joyce Lo, Beatrice Yuen, Andrea Duncan, Nick Reed, Behdin Nowrouzi-Kia","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aims to comprehensively explore the facilitators and barriers influencing the return to work (RTW) process following a concussion, with a focus on the person impacted by concussion, medical system, funder, and workplace domains.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A scoping review of electronic databases, including CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science, was conducted to identify relevant studies published up to April 6, 2024. Studies were included if they examined factors influencing RTW following a concussion and were available in English. Data extraction, numerical analysis and deductive content analysis were performed to determine key themes from the data. Reporting guidelines provided by the PRISMA-ScR were adhered to, and the protocol has been registered and can be accessed at the Open Science Framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Findings were organized into 4 main themes influencing the RTW process: the person impacted by concussion, medical system, funder, and workplace. These were further categorized into 2 subthemes: supportive elements and challenges. Various supportive elements within each theme were identified, such as individualized rehabilitation services, graduated return to work, and developing personal agency in the individual impacted by concussion. Challenges such as lack of patient education, delayed access to services, and isolating workplace accommodations were highlighted. These findings underscore the complex interplay of factors shaping the RTW trajectory post-concussion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This scoping review provides a detailed examination of supportive elements and challenges in the RTW process following a concussion. The identified themes offer valuable insights for clinicians and researchers seeking to optimize RTW outcomes and support individuals re-entering the workforce after a concussion. Future research should prioritize an examination of relevant policies and practices, assessing long-term outcomes, and explore strategies to integrate support systems to enhance the RTW experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supportive Elements and Challenges to Return to Work Following a Concussion: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Maryam Shahzad, Joyce Lo, Beatrice Yuen, Andrea Duncan, Nick Reed, Behdin Nowrouzi-Kia\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aims to comprehensively explore the facilitators and barriers influencing the return to work (RTW) process following a concussion, with a focus on the person impacted by concussion, medical system, funder, and workplace domains.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A scoping review of electronic databases, including CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science, was conducted to identify relevant studies published up to April 6, 2024. Studies were included if they examined factors influencing RTW following a concussion and were available in English. Data extraction, numerical analysis and deductive content analysis were performed to determine key themes from the data. Reporting guidelines provided by the PRISMA-ScR were adhered to, and the protocol has been registered and can be accessed at the Open Science Framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Findings were organized into 4 main themes influencing the RTW process: the person impacted by concussion, medical system, funder, and workplace. These were further categorized into 2 subthemes: supportive elements and challenges. Various supportive elements within each theme were identified, such as individualized rehabilitation services, graduated return to work, and developing personal agency in the individual impacted by concussion. Challenges such as lack of patient education, delayed access to services, and isolating workplace accommodations were highlighted. These findings underscore the complex interplay of factors shaping the RTW trajectory post-concussion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This scoping review provides a detailed examination of supportive elements and challenges in the RTW process following a concussion. The identified themes offer valuable insights for clinicians and researchers seeking to optimize RTW outcomes and support individuals re-entering the workforce after a concussion. Future research should prioritize an examination of relevant policies and practices, assessing long-term outcomes, and explore strategies to integrate support systems to enhance the RTW experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000001064\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000001064","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本综述旨在全面探讨影响脑震荡后重返工作(RTW)过程的因素和障碍,重点关注受脑震荡影响的人、医疗系统、资助者和工作场所领域。设计:对包括CINAHL、Embase、MEDLINE、PsycINFO和Web of Science在内的电子数据库进行范围审查,以确定截至2024年4月6日发表的相关研究。如果研究涉及影响脑震荡后RTW的因素,并提供英文版本,则纳入研究。通过数据提取、数值分析和演绎内容分析,从数据中确定关键主题。遵守PRISMA-ScR提供的报告指南,该协议已注册,可在开放科学框架上访问。结果:20项研究符合纳入标准并被纳入本综述。研究结果被分为影响RTW过程的4个主要主题:受脑震荡影响的人、医疗系统、资助者和工作场所。这些进一步分为两个次级主题:支持因素和挑战。在每个主题中确定了各种支持元素,例如个性化康复服务,逐步重返工作岗位,以及在受脑震荡影响的个人中发展个人代理。强调了缺乏患者教育、延迟获得服务和隔离工作场所住宿等挑战。这些发现强调了影响脑震荡后RTW轨迹的因素之间复杂的相互作用。结论:本综述对脑震荡后RTW过程中的支持因素和挑战进行了详细的研究。确定的主题为寻求优化RTW结果的临床医生和研究人员提供了有价值的见解,并支持脑震荡后重返工作岗位的个人。未来的研究应优先审查相关政策和做法,评估长期成果,并探索整合支持系统的战略,以提高RTW经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supportive Elements and Challenges to Return to Work Following a Concussion: A Scoping Review.

Objective: This scoping review aims to comprehensively explore the facilitators and barriers influencing the return to work (RTW) process following a concussion, with a focus on the person impacted by concussion, medical system, funder, and workplace domains.

Design: A scoping review of electronic databases, including CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science, was conducted to identify relevant studies published up to April 6, 2024. Studies were included if they examined factors influencing RTW following a concussion and were available in English. Data extraction, numerical analysis and deductive content analysis were performed to determine key themes from the data. Reporting guidelines provided by the PRISMA-ScR were adhered to, and the protocol has been registered and can be accessed at the Open Science Framework.

Results: Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Findings were organized into 4 main themes influencing the RTW process: the person impacted by concussion, medical system, funder, and workplace. These were further categorized into 2 subthemes: supportive elements and challenges. Various supportive elements within each theme were identified, such as individualized rehabilitation services, graduated return to work, and developing personal agency in the individual impacted by concussion. Challenges such as lack of patient education, delayed access to services, and isolating workplace accommodations were highlighted. These findings underscore the complex interplay of factors shaping the RTW trajectory post-concussion.

Conclusion: This scoping review provides a detailed examination of supportive elements and challenges in the RTW process following a concussion. The identified themes offer valuable insights for clinicians and researchers seeking to optimize RTW outcomes and support individuals re-entering the workforce after a concussion. Future research should prioritize an examination of relevant policies and practices, assessing long-term outcomes, and explore strategies to integrate support systems to enhance the RTW experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation is a leading, peer-reviewed resource that provides up-to-date information on the clinical management and rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Six issues each year aspire to the vision of “knowledge informing care” and include a wide range of articles, topical issues, commentaries and special features. It is the official journal of the Brain Injury Association of America (BIAA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信