医学教育教师发展实践社区培养的障碍和促进因素:范围审查。

IF 3.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Simon Kitto, Arone Wondwossen Fantaye, Monica Ghidinelli, Kokeb Andenmatten, Jane Thorley Wiedler, Kate de Boer
{"title":"医学教育教师发展实践社区培养的障碍和促进因素:范围审查。","authors":"Simon Kitto, Arone Wondwossen Fantaye, Monica Ghidinelli, Kokeb Andenmatten, Jane Thorley Wiedler, Kate de Boer","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2025.2495628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Communities of practice (CoPs) have been promoted as a strategy to foster the professional development of faculty. In recent years, there have been a rising number of publications in the field of medical education that report on the impact of CoPs in faculty development (FD), as well as the factors that influence their cultivation. The objective of this scoping review was to comprehensively map the reported barriers and facilitators to cultivating CoPs for FD in medical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors searched five electronic databases on 15 January 2022, and in a final update search on 4 August 2024. The authors used the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research as an a priori coding framework to guide coding. The authors applied a quasi-statistical content analysis to quantify and draw meaning from the factors that constrain and support CoP formation, implementation and sustainability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The authors generated 359 codes for barriers and facilitators from 25 included empirical and non-empirical articles, of which 295 codes (82%) were relevant to forming and implementing a CoP, and 64 (18%) relevant to sustaining a CoP. The main barriers and facilitators were related to: the sufficiency of structural, cultural and resource support; the availability and fit of required stakeholders; relevance to member needs; planning; member attraction and engagement; and reflection and evaluation of the CoP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review highlights the key patterns and gaps in the emerging publications on CoP cultivation for FD in medical education, from their formation to their sustainability. There remain key unresolved problems and gaps in the evidence concerning how to create long-term participation successfully to sustain CoPs for FD in medical education. Although hybrid and virtual CoPs appear to be the way forward, there is still a need to account for individual member capabilities and needs, and the nature of the medical education context on CoP sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and facilitators to the cultivation of communities of practice for faculty development in medical education: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Simon Kitto, Arone Wondwossen Fantaye, Monica Ghidinelli, Kokeb Andenmatten, Jane Thorley Wiedler, Kate de Boer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0142159X.2025.2495628\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Communities of practice (CoPs) have been promoted as a strategy to foster the professional development of faculty. In recent years, there have been a rising number of publications in the field of medical education that report on the impact of CoPs in faculty development (FD), as well as the factors that influence their cultivation. The objective of this scoping review was to comprehensively map the reported barriers and facilitators to cultivating CoPs for FD in medical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors searched five electronic databases on 15 January 2022, and in a final update search on 4 August 2024. The authors used the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research as an a priori coding framework to guide coding. The authors applied a quasi-statistical content analysis to quantify and draw meaning from the factors that constrain and support CoP formation, implementation and sustainability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The authors generated 359 codes for barriers and facilitators from 25 included empirical and non-empirical articles, of which 295 codes (82%) were relevant to forming and implementing a CoP, and 64 (18%) relevant to sustaining a CoP. The main barriers and facilitators were related to: the sufficiency of structural, cultural and resource support; the availability and fit of required stakeholders; relevance to member needs; planning; member attraction and engagement; and reflection and evaluation of the CoP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review highlights the key patterns and gaps in the emerging publications on CoP cultivation for FD in medical education, from their formation to their sustainability. There remain key unresolved problems and gaps in the evidence concerning how to create long-term participation successfully to sustain CoPs for FD in medical education. Although hybrid and virtual CoPs appear to be the way forward, there is still a need to account for individual member capabilities and needs, and the nature of the medical education context on CoP sustainability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Teacher\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Teacher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2025.2495628\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2025.2495628","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:实践社区(cop)作为一种促进教师专业发展的策略已经得到了推广。近年来,医学教育领域越来越多的出版物报道了cop对教师发展(FD)的影响,以及影响其培养的因素。这项范围审查的目的是全面绘制报告的障碍和促进因素在医学教育中培养FD的cop。方法:作者于2022年1月15日检索5个电子数据库,并于2024年8月4日进行最后一次更新检索。作者将更新后的《实施研究统一框架》作为指导编码的先验编码框架。作者采用准统计的内容分析方法,对制约和支持缔约方会议形成、实施和可持续性的因素进行量化分析,并从中获得意义。结果:作者从25篇纳入的经验和非经验文章中生成了359条障碍和促进因素代码,其中295条(82%)与CoP的形成和实施有关,64条(18%)与CoP的维持有关。主要障碍和促进因素涉及:结构、文化和资源支持的充分性;所需干系人的可用性和合适性;切合会员需要;规划;会员吸引力和参与度;以及对缔约方会议的反思和评价。结论:本文综述了医学教育中临床医师CoP培养的主要模式和差距,从其形成到其可持续性。关于如何成功地创造长期参与以维持FD在医学教育中的cop,证据方面仍然存在关键的未解决的问题和差距。虽然混合和虚拟缔约方会议似乎是前进的方向,但仍然需要考虑到个别成员的能力和需求,以及缔约方会议可持续性的医学教育背景的性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers and facilitators to the cultivation of communities of practice for faculty development in medical education: A scoping review.

Background: Communities of practice (CoPs) have been promoted as a strategy to foster the professional development of faculty. In recent years, there have been a rising number of publications in the field of medical education that report on the impact of CoPs in faculty development (FD), as well as the factors that influence their cultivation. The objective of this scoping review was to comprehensively map the reported barriers and facilitators to cultivating CoPs for FD in medical education.

Methods: The authors searched five electronic databases on 15 January 2022, and in a final update search on 4 August 2024. The authors used the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research as an a priori coding framework to guide coding. The authors applied a quasi-statistical content analysis to quantify and draw meaning from the factors that constrain and support CoP formation, implementation and sustainability.

Results: The authors generated 359 codes for barriers and facilitators from 25 included empirical and non-empirical articles, of which 295 codes (82%) were relevant to forming and implementing a CoP, and 64 (18%) relevant to sustaining a CoP. The main barriers and facilitators were related to: the sufficiency of structural, cultural and resource support; the availability and fit of required stakeholders; relevance to member needs; planning; member attraction and engagement; and reflection and evaluation of the CoP.

Conclusions: This review highlights the key patterns and gaps in the emerging publications on CoP cultivation for FD in medical education, from their formation to their sustainability. There remain key unresolved problems and gaps in the evidence concerning how to create long-term participation successfully to sustain CoPs for FD in medical education. Although hybrid and virtual CoPs appear to be the way forward, there is still a need to account for individual member capabilities and needs, and the nature of the medical education context on CoP sustainability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Teacher
Medical Teacher 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.50%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信