初级保健骨质疏松症电子病历可提取质量指标的发展:一种修正的德尔菲法。

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Elize Heymans, Elisabeth Segaert, Bert Vaes, Steve Van den Bulck
{"title":"初级保健骨质疏松症电子病历可提取质量指标的发展:一种修正的德尔菲法。","authors":"Elize Heymans, Elisabeth Segaert, Bert Vaes, Steve Van den Bulck","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02841-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoporosis is a common chronic condition and a cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Currently, osteoporosis is under-diagnosed and under-treated. There is an important role for the general practitioner (GP) in the prevention and management of this condition. The electronic health record (EHR) can be used to effectively pinpoint at-risk patients and enhance the quality of care provided to those suffering from osteoporosis. This study aims to develop evidence-based and EHR-extractable quality indicators (QIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The RAND/UCLA- modified Delphi method was used. After an extensive literature search, recommendations were retrieved from the selected evidence-based guidelines and included in a questionnaire if they met the 'SMART'-criteria (specific, measurable, acceptable, realistic and time-related). Next, an expert panel (8 general practitioners, 2 patients, a geriatrician, a rheumatologist and an EHR specialist) was formed and asked to grade the selected recommendations individually. A consensus meeting was hosted to discuss the results. After their final appraisal, a set of quality indicators was developed out of the included recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 11 evidence-based guidelines 478 recommendations were retrieved. After applying the 'SMART' criteria, 38 recommendations were presented to the panel of experts. After the written questionnaire round and the consensus meeting 25 recommendations were included. Twenty recommendations remained after final appraisal and were converted into 34 quality indicators of which 13 are currently extractable out of the electronic health record in Belgium.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study generated 34 evidence-based quality indicators for osteoporosis in primary care. This set enables general practitioners to measure and enhance the quality of care for osteoporosis patients through automated audit and feedback.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12051292/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The development of electronic health record-extractable quality indicators for osteoporosis in primary care: A rand-modified Delphi method.\",\"authors\":\"Elize Heymans, Elisabeth Segaert, Bert Vaes, Steve Van den Bulck\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12875-025-02841-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osteoporosis is a common chronic condition and a cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Currently, osteoporosis is under-diagnosed and under-treated. There is an important role for the general practitioner (GP) in the prevention and management of this condition. The electronic health record (EHR) can be used to effectively pinpoint at-risk patients and enhance the quality of care provided to those suffering from osteoporosis. This study aims to develop evidence-based and EHR-extractable quality indicators (QIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The RAND/UCLA- modified Delphi method was used. After an extensive literature search, recommendations were retrieved from the selected evidence-based guidelines and included in a questionnaire if they met the 'SMART'-criteria (specific, measurable, acceptable, realistic and time-related). Next, an expert panel (8 general practitioners, 2 patients, a geriatrician, a rheumatologist and an EHR specialist) was formed and asked to grade the selected recommendations individually. A consensus meeting was hosted to discuss the results. After their final appraisal, a set of quality indicators was developed out of the included recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 11 evidence-based guidelines 478 recommendations were retrieved. After applying the 'SMART' criteria, 38 recommendations were presented to the panel of experts. After the written questionnaire round and the consensus meeting 25 recommendations were included. Twenty recommendations remained after final appraisal and were converted into 34 quality indicators of which 13 are currently extractable out of the electronic health record in Belgium.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study generated 34 evidence-based quality indicators for osteoporosis in primary care. This set enables general practitioners to measure and enhance the quality of care for osteoporosis patients through automated audit and feedback.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC primary care\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12051292/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC primary care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02841-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02841-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:骨质疏松症是一种常见的慢性疾病,也是全世界发病率和死亡率的主要原因之一。目前,骨质疏松症的诊断和治疗不足。有一个重要的作用,全科医生(GP)在预防和管理这种情况。电子健康记录(EHR)可用于有效地确定有风险的患者,并提高向骨质疏松症患者提供的护理质量。本研究旨在建立循证的ehr可提取质量指标(QIs)。方法:采用RAND/UCLA改进的德尔菲法。经过广泛的文献检索,从选定的循证指南中检索建议,如果它们符合“SMART”标准(具体的、可测量的、可接受的、现实的和与时间相关的),则将其纳入调查问卷。接下来,成立了一个专家小组(8名全科医生、2名患者、一名老年病专家、一名风湿病专家和一名电子病历专家),并要求对选定的建议进行单独评分。召开了一次协商一致会议,讨论结果。在最后评估之后,根据所列入的建议制订了一套质量指标。结果:在11项循证指南中,检索到478项建议。在应用“SMART”标准后,向专家小组提交了38项建议。在书面问卷轮询和协商一致会议之后,提出了25项建议。在最后评估之后,仍有20项建议被转化为34项质量指标,其中13项目前已从比利时的电子健康记录中提取出来。结论:本研究生成了34项骨质疏松初级保健循证质量指标。这套系统使全科医生能够通过自动审计和反馈来测量和提高骨质疏松症患者的护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The development of electronic health record-extractable quality indicators for osteoporosis in primary care: A rand-modified Delphi method.

Background: Osteoporosis is a common chronic condition and a cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Currently, osteoporosis is under-diagnosed and under-treated. There is an important role for the general practitioner (GP) in the prevention and management of this condition. The electronic health record (EHR) can be used to effectively pinpoint at-risk patients and enhance the quality of care provided to those suffering from osteoporosis. This study aims to develop evidence-based and EHR-extractable quality indicators (QIs).

Methods: The RAND/UCLA- modified Delphi method was used. After an extensive literature search, recommendations were retrieved from the selected evidence-based guidelines and included in a questionnaire if they met the 'SMART'-criteria (specific, measurable, acceptable, realistic and time-related). Next, an expert panel (8 general practitioners, 2 patients, a geriatrician, a rheumatologist and an EHR specialist) was formed and asked to grade the selected recommendations individually. A consensus meeting was hosted to discuss the results. After their final appraisal, a set of quality indicators was developed out of the included recommendations.

Results: Out of 11 evidence-based guidelines 478 recommendations were retrieved. After applying the 'SMART' criteria, 38 recommendations were presented to the panel of experts. After the written questionnaire round and the consensus meeting 25 recommendations were included. Twenty recommendations remained after final appraisal and were converted into 34 quality indicators of which 13 are currently extractable out of the electronic health record in Belgium.

Conclusion: This study generated 34 evidence-based quality indicators for osteoporosis in primary care. This set enables general practitioners to measure and enhance the quality of care for osteoporosis patients through automated audit and feedback.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信