临床医生对化脓性汗腺炎知识的评估:来自多学科调查研究的见解。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Klaudia Knecht-Gurwin, Adam Gurwin, Magdalena Łyko, Tomasz Drewa, Wojciech Kielan, Agnieszka Mastalerz-Migas, Rafał Stojko, Jacek C Szepietowski, Lukasz Matusiak
{"title":"临床医生对化脓性汗腺炎知识的评估:来自多学科调查研究的见解。","authors":"Klaudia Knecht-Gurwin, Adam Gurwin, Magdalena Łyko, Tomasz Drewa, Wojciech Kielan, Agnieszka Mastalerz-Migas, Rafał Stojko, Jacek C Szepietowski, Lukasz Matusiak","doi":"10.3390/jcm14093171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, debilitating skin disease primarily diagnosed through clinical examination. Despite its characteristic clinical features, HS remains under-recognized and frequently misclassified, especially by non-dermatologist clinicians. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of HS across various specialties, identify knowledge gaps, and inform targeted educational strategies to reduce diagnostic delays. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional survey was conducted during multidisciplinary scientific conferences, enrolling 655 clinicians including dermatologists, gynecologists, urologists, general surgeons, and general practitioners. Participants were presented with clinical images representing HS lesions at Hurley stages I-III and responded to open-ended and closed-ended diagnostic questions. Data were analyzed to assess diagnostic accuracy and compare recognition patterns across specialties. <b>Results:</b> The recognition of HS varied significantly by specialty and disease stage. For Hurley stage III axillary disease, correct identification was highest among dermatologists (96.56%) compared to general practitioners (48.91%), gynecologists (31.25%), urologists (40%), and general surgeons (63.64%). In a Hurley II genital case in a male patient, only 34.5% diagnosed HS, while 25.65% suggested furunculosis and 16.18% venereal granuloma. For a Hurley I genital case in a female patient, 29.92% diagnosed HS, with furunculosis (23.36%) and steatocystoma multiplex (14.35%) as common misdiagnoses. A Hurley III buttock case was correctly identified by only 29.77% of participants. <b>Conclusions:</b> This large, first-of-its-kind global survey highlights substantial gaps in HS recognition, particularly among non-dermatologist clinicians. The findings underscore the urgent need for targeted, multidisciplinary educational interventions to improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce delays, and ultimately enhance patient outcomes in HS.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12072315/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Assessment of Clinician Knowledge of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Insights from a Multidisciplinary Survey Study.\",\"authors\":\"Klaudia Knecht-Gurwin, Adam Gurwin, Magdalena Łyko, Tomasz Drewa, Wojciech Kielan, Agnieszka Mastalerz-Migas, Rafał Stojko, Jacek C Szepietowski, Lukasz Matusiak\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcm14093171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, debilitating skin disease primarily diagnosed through clinical examination. Despite its characteristic clinical features, HS remains under-recognized and frequently misclassified, especially by non-dermatologist clinicians. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of HS across various specialties, identify knowledge gaps, and inform targeted educational strategies to reduce diagnostic delays. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional survey was conducted during multidisciplinary scientific conferences, enrolling 655 clinicians including dermatologists, gynecologists, urologists, general surgeons, and general practitioners. Participants were presented with clinical images representing HS lesions at Hurley stages I-III and responded to open-ended and closed-ended diagnostic questions. Data were analyzed to assess diagnostic accuracy and compare recognition patterns across specialties. <b>Results:</b> The recognition of HS varied significantly by specialty and disease stage. For Hurley stage III axillary disease, correct identification was highest among dermatologists (96.56%) compared to general practitioners (48.91%), gynecologists (31.25%), urologists (40%), and general surgeons (63.64%). In a Hurley II genital case in a male patient, only 34.5% diagnosed HS, while 25.65% suggested furunculosis and 16.18% venereal granuloma. For a Hurley I genital case in a female patient, 29.92% diagnosed HS, with furunculosis (23.36%) and steatocystoma multiplex (14.35%) as common misdiagnoses. A Hurley III buttock case was correctly identified by only 29.77% of participants. <b>Conclusions:</b> This large, first-of-its-kind global survey highlights substantial gaps in HS recognition, particularly among non-dermatologist clinicians. The findings underscore the urgent need for targeted, multidisciplinary educational interventions to improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce delays, and ultimately enhance patient outcomes in HS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12072315/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14093171\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14093171","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:化脓性汗腺炎(HS)是一种慢性、衰弱性皮肤病,主要通过临床检查诊断。尽管其典型的临床特征,HS仍未得到充分认识,并经常被错误分类,特别是由非皮肤科医生临床医生。本研究旨在评估HS在不同专业的诊断准确性,确定知识差距,并为有针对性的教育策略提供信息,以减少诊断延误。方法:在多学科科学会议期间进行横断面调查,纳入655名临床医生,包括皮肤科医生、妇科医生、泌尿科医生、普通外科医生和全科医生。研究人员向参与者展示了赫尔利期I-III期HS病变的临床图像,并回答了开放式和封闭式的诊断问题。对数据进行分析,以评估诊断的准确性,并比较不同专业的识别模式。结果:不同专科和疾病分期对HS的认识差异显著。对于Hurley III期腋窝疾病,皮肤科医生(96.56%)的正确率最高,高于全科医生(48.91%)、妇科医生(31.25%)、泌尿科医生(40%)和普外科医生(63.64%)。1例男性Hurley II型生殖器病例中,诊断HS的比例仅为34.5%,诊断为疖病的比例为25.65%,诊断为性病肉芽肿的比例为16.18%。1例女性Hurley I型生殖器病例中,29.92%诊断为HS,常见误诊为疖病(23.36%)和多发性脂肪囊瘤(14.35%)。赫尔利III型臀部病例的正确识别率仅为29.77%。结论:这项首次开展的大型全球调查突出了在HS认识方面的巨大差距,特别是在非皮肤科医生临床医生中。研究结果强调,迫切需要有针对性的多学科教育干预措施,以提高诊断准确性,减少延误,并最终提高HS患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Assessment of Clinician Knowledge of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Insights from a Multidisciplinary Survey Study.

Background/Objectives: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, debilitating skin disease primarily diagnosed through clinical examination. Despite its characteristic clinical features, HS remains under-recognized and frequently misclassified, especially by non-dermatologist clinicians. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of HS across various specialties, identify knowledge gaps, and inform targeted educational strategies to reduce diagnostic delays. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted during multidisciplinary scientific conferences, enrolling 655 clinicians including dermatologists, gynecologists, urologists, general surgeons, and general practitioners. Participants were presented with clinical images representing HS lesions at Hurley stages I-III and responded to open-ended and closed-ended diagnostic questions. Data were analyzed to assess diagnostic accuracy and compare recognition patterns across specialties. Results: The recognition of HS varied significantly by specialty and disease stage. For Hurley stage III axillary disease, correct identification was highest among dermatologists (96.56%) compared to general practitioners (48.91%), gynecologists (31.25%), urologists (40%), and general surgeons (63.64%). In a Hurley II genital case in a male patient, only 34.5% diagnosed HS, while 25.65% suggested furunculosis and 16.18% venereal granuloma. For a Hurley I genital case in a female patient, 29.92% diagnosed HS, with furunculosis (23.36%) and steatocystoma multiplex (14.35%) as common misdiagnoses. A Hurley III buttock case was correctly identified by only 29.77% of participants. Conclusions: This large, first-of-its-kind global survey highlights substantial gaps in HS recognition, particularly among non-dermatologist clinicians. The findings underscore the urgent need for targeted, multidisciplinary educational interventions to improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce delays, and ultimately enhance patient outcomes in HS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信