关节镜治疗肩关节病变的技术和材料:巴西肩关节外科学会成员的调查。

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Acta Ortopedica Brasileira Pub Date : 2025-04-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1413-785220243201e283711
Guilherme Macillo Correia, Gustavo DE Mello Ribeiro Pinto, Rodrigo Chauke Rezende, Cristiano Nabuco Dantas, Marcelo Costa DE Oliveira Campos, Gilberto Zinn Schütz
{"title":"关节镜治疗肩关节病变的技术和材料:巴西肩关节外科学会成员的调查。","authors":"Guilherme Macillo Correia, Gustavo DE Mello Ribeiro Pinto, Rodrigo Chauke Rezende, Cristiano Nabuco Dantas, Marcelo Costa DE Oliveira Campos, Gilberto Zinn Schütz","doi":"10.1590/1413-785220243201e283711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the preferences of shoulder and elbow surgeons from the Brazilian Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery to treat rotator cuff injuries, glenohumeral instability, and acromioclavicular dislocations considering a current and an ideal scenarios.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide survey included 314 specialists who answered a 20-question questionnaire on treating shoulder pathologies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 314 specialists. Most (96%) perform rotator cuff repair arthroscopically and 74% use metallic anchors as a fixation method. In open surgery, most specialists reported using anchors (75%) instead of transosseous sutures. In treating glenohumeral instability via arthroscopic Bankart repair, 86% used three or more fixation anchors and 87%, bioabsorbable anchors. In Latarjet cases, 57% used cannulated screws. In treating acute acromioclavicular dislocations, 88% used the open route. Regarding fixation, 70% chose high-resistance wires; 65%, anchors; and 61%, Kirschner wires.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current Brazilian scenario has limited availability of ideal instruments and materials so specialists can treat shoulder pathologies. However, specialists' preferences agree with the latest medical literature. <b><i>Level of evidence V, Expert opinion.</i></b></p>","PeriodicalId":55563,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","volume":"33 spe1","pages":"e283711"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11978303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TECHNIQUES AND MATERIALS TO TREAT SHOULDER PATHOLOGIES BY ARTHROSCOPY: A SURVEY IN MEMBERS OF THE BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY.\",\"authors\":\"Guilherme Macillo Correia, Gustavo DE Mello Ribeiro Pinto, Rodrigo Chauke Rezende, Cristiano Nabuco Dantas, Marcelo Costa DE Oliveira Campos, Gilberto Zinn Schütz\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1413-785220243201e283711\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the preferences of shoulder and elbow surgeons from the Brazilian Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery to treat rotator cuff injuries, glenohumeral instability, and acromioclavicular dislocations considering a current and an ideal scenarios.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide survey included 314 specialists who answered a 20-question questionnaire on treating shoulder pathologies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 314 specialists. Most (96%) perform rotator cuff repair arthroscopically and 74% use metallic anchors as a fixation method. In open surgery, most specialists reported using anchors (75%) instead of transosseous sutures. In treating glenohumeral instability via arthroscopic Bankart repair, 86% used three or more fixation anchors and 87%, bioabsorbable anchors. In Latarjet cases, 57% used cannulated screws. In treating acute acromioclavicular dislocations, 88% used the open route. Regarding fixation, 70% chose high-resistance wires; 65%, anchors; and 61%, Kirschner wires.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current Brazilian scenario has limited availability of ideal instruments and materials so specialists can treat shoulder pathologies. However, specialists' preferences agree with the latest medical literature. <b><i>Level of evidence V, Expert opinion.</i></b></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira\",\"volume\":\"33 spe1\",\"pages\":\"e283711\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11978303/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220243201e283711\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220243201e283711","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:考虑当前和理想的情况,评估巴西肩肘外科学会肩肘外科医生治疗肩袖损伤、肩关节不稳定和肩锁关节脱位的偏好。方法:在全国范围内对314名专家进行调查,他们回答了关于治疗肩部疾病的20个问题的问卷。结果:本研究纳入314名专科医生。大多数(96%)进行关节镜下的肩袖修复,74%使用金属锚钉作为固定方法。在开放手术中,大多数专家报告使用锚钉(75%)而不是经骨缝合。在通过关节镜Bankart修复治疗盂肱部不稳定时,86%的患者使用三个或更多固定锚,87%的患者使用生物可吸收锚。在Latarjet病例中,57%使用空心螺钉。在治疗急性肩锁关节脱位时,88%的患者采用开放入路。在固定方面,70%的人选择高阻丝;65%,锚;61%是克氏针。结论:目前巴西的情况下,理想的器械和材料的可用性有限,因此专家可以治疗肩部病变。然而,专家们的偏好与最新的医学文献一致。证据等级V,专家意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
TECHNIQUES AND MATERIALS TO TREAT SHOULDER PATHOLOGIES BY ARTHROSCOPY: A SURVEY IN MEMBERS OF THE BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY.

Objective: To evaluate the preferences of shoulder and elbow surgeons from the Brazilian Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery to treat rotator cuff injuries, glenohumeral instability, and acromioclavicular dislocations considering a current and an ideal scenarios.

Methods: A nationwide survey included 314 specialists who answered a 20-question questionnaire on treating shoulder pathologies.

Results: This study included 314 specialists. Most (96%) perform rotator cuff repair arthroscopically and 74% use metallic anchors as a fixation method. In open surgery, most specialists reported using anchors (75%) instead of transosseous sutures. In treating glenohumeral instability via arthroscopic Bankart repair, 86% used three or more fixation anchors and 87%, bioabsorbable anchors. In Latarjet cases, 57% used cannulated screws. In treating acute acromioclavicular dislocations, 88% used the open route. Regarding fixation, 70% chose high-resistance wires; 65%, anchors; and 61%, Kirschner wires.

Conclusion: The current Brazilian scenario has limited availability of ideal instruments and materials so specialists can treat shoulder pathologies. However, specialists' preferences agree with the latest medical literature. Level of evidence V, Expert opinion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
67
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: A Revista Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, órgão oficial do Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (DOT/FMUSP), é publicada bimestralmente em seis edições ao ano (jan/fev, mar/abr, maio/jun, jul/ago, set/out e nov/dez) com versão em inglês disponível nos principais indexadores nacionais e internacionais e instituições de ensino do Brasil. Sendo hoje reconhecidamente uma importante contribuição para os especialistas da área com sua seriedade e árduo trabalho para as indexações já conquistadas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信