Anishka Cameron, John Connolly, Regina Esiovwa, Fiona L Henriquez, Andrew Hursthouse, Suparna Mukherji, Soumyo Mukherji
{"title":"“注意差距”:利益相关者对印度环境中抗菌素耐药性问题的看法。","authors":"Anishka Cameron, John Connolly, Regina Esiovwa, Fiona L Henriquez, Andrew Hursthouse, Suparna Mukherji, Soumyo Mukherji","doi":"10.1080/16549716.2025.2491200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is growing global awareness of the pivotal role environmental factors, including pharmaceutical manufacturing waste, play in the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). India bears one of the highest burdens of AMR globally and possesses a substantial manufacturing sector, but limited insight is available on how to practically mitigate environmental AMR-related risk in this context.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand the barriers and opportunities in managing manufacturing waste for addressing AMR in the environment from the perspectives of stakeholders in India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with a range of stakeholders from government, industry, and civil society following a stakeholder mapping and analysis process within the Indian context. We also undertook a series of stakeholder events to inform the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings indicate that 1) Policy action is fragmentary and there are economic and capacity gaps that have implications for industry behaviours; 2) A One Health approach to addressing AMR in the environment requires leadership and that means AMR prevention needs to be institutionalised within government for them to steer, facilitate and coordinate; and 3) There is a need to enhance knowledge amongst policymakers in India about AMR in the environment, and robust 'evidence' is required to foster policy change.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study underscores the need for a multifaceted strategy to address the contribution of pharmaceutical manufacturing waste to AMR in the environment in India. Greater prioritisation of AMR, stakeholder collaboration, and capacity building are essential to overcoming the challenges identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":49197,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Action","volume":"18 1","pages":"2491200"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046612/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Mind the gaps': stakeholder perspectives on addressing antimicrobial resistance in the environment in the Indian context.\",\"authors\":\"Anishka Cameron, John Connolly, Regina Esiovwa, Fiona L Henriquez, Andrew Hursthouse, Suparna Mukherji, Soumyo Mukherji\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/16549716.2025.2491200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is growing global awareness of the pivotal role environmental factors, including pharmaceutical manufacturing waste, play in the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). India bears one of the highest burdens of AMR globally and possesses a substantial manufacturing sector, but limited insight is available on how to practically mitigate environmental AMR-related risk in this context.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand the barriers and opportunities in managing manufacturing waste for addressing AMR in the environment from the perspectives of stakeholders in India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with a range of stakeholders from government, industry, and civil society following a stakeholder mapping and analysis process within the Indian context. We also undertook a series of stakeholder events to inform the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings indicate that 1) Policy action is fragmentary and there are economic and capacity gaps that have implications for industry behaviours; 2) A One Health approach to addressing AMR in the environment requires leadership and that means AMR prevention needs to be institutionalised within government for them to steer, facilitate and coordinate; and 3) There is a need to enhance knowledge amongst policymakers in India about AMR in the environment, and robust 'evidence' is required to foster policy change.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study underscores the need for a multifaceted strategy to address the contribution of pharmaceutical manufacturing waste to AMR in the environment in India. Greater prioritisation of AMR, stakeholder collaboration, and capacity building are essential to overcoming the challenges identified.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Health Action\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"2491200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046612/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Health Action\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2025.2491200\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Action","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2025.2491200","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
'Mind the gaps': stakeholder perspectives on addressing antimicrobial resistance in the environment in the Indian context.
Background: There is growing global awareness of the pivotal role environmental factors, including pharmaceutical manufacturing waste, play in the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). India bears one of the highest burdens of AMR globally and possesses a substantial manufacturing sector, but limited insight is available on how to practically mitigate environmental AMR-related risk in this context.
Objective: To understand the barriers and opportunities in managing manufacturing waste for addressing AMR in the environment from the perspectives of stakeholders in India.
Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with a range of stakeholders from government, industry, and civil society following a stakeholder mapping and analysis process within the Indian context. We also undertook a series of stakeholder events to inform the study.
Results: Our findings indicate that 1) Policy action is fragmentary and there are economic and capacity gaps that have implications for industry behaviours; 2) A One Health approach to addressing AMR in the environment requires leadership and that means AMR prevention needs to be institutionalised within government for them to steer, facilitate and coordinate; and 3) There is a need to enhance knowledge amongst policymakers in India about AMR in the environment, and robust 'evidence' is required to foster policy change.
Conclusions: The study underscores the need for a multifaceted strategy to address the contribution of pharmaceutical manufacturing waste to AMR in the environment in India. Greater prioritisation of AMR, stakeholder collaboration, and capacity building are essential to overcoming the challenges identified.
期刊介绍:
Global Health Action is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal affiliated with the Unit of Epidemiology and Global Health, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine at Umeå University, Sweden. The Unit hosts the Umeå International School of Public Health and the Umeå Centre for Global Health Research.
Vision: Our vision is to be a leading journal in the global health field, narrowing health information gaps and contributing to the implementation of policies and actions that lead to improved global health.
Aim: The widening gap between the winners and losers of globalisation presents major public health challenges. To meet these challenges, it is crucial to generate new knowledge and evidence in the field and in settings where the evidence is lacking, as well as to bridge the gaps between existing knowledge and implementation of relevant findings. Thus, the aim of Global Health Action is to contribute to fuelling a more concrete, hands-on approach to addressing global health challenges. Manuscripts suggesting strategies for practical interventions and research implementations where none already exist are specifically welcomed. Further, the journal encourages articles from low- and middle-income countries, while also welcoming articles originated from South-South and South-North collaborations. All articles are expected to address a global agenda and include a strong implementation or policy component.