“注意差距”:利益相关者对印度环境中抗菌素耐药性问题的看法。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Global Health Action Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1080/16549716.2025.2491200
Anishka Cameron, John Connolly, Regina Esiovwa, Fiona L Henriquez, Andrew Hursthouse, Suparna Mukherji, Soumyo Mukherji
{"title":"“注意差距”:利益相关者对印度环境中抗菌素耐药性问题的看法。","authors":"Anishka Cameron, John Connolly, Regina Esiovwa, Fiona L Henriquez, Andrew Hursthouse, Suparna Mukherji, Soumyo Mukherji","doi":"10.1080/16549716.2025.2491200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is growing global awareness of the pivotal role environmental factors, including pharmaceutical manufacturing waste, play in the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). India bears one of the highest burdens of AMR globally and possesses a substantial manufacturing sector, but limited insight is available on how to practically mitigate environmental AMR-related risk in this context.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand the barriers and opportunities in managing manufacturing waste for addressing AMR in the environment from the perspectives of stakeholders in India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with a range of stakeholders from government, industry, and civil society following a stakeholder mapping and analysis process within the Indian context. We also undertook a series of stakeholder events to inform the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings indicate that 1) Policy action is fragmentary and there are economic and capacity gaps that have implications for industry behaviours; 2) A One Health approach to addressing AMR in the environment requires leadership and that means AMR prevention needs to be institutionalised within government for them to steer, facilitate and coordinate; and 3) There is a need to enhance knowledge amongst policymakers in India about AMR in the environment, and robust 'evidence' is required to foster policy change.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study underscores the need for a multifaceted strategy to address the contribution of pharmaceutical manufacturing waste to AMR in the environment in India. Greater prioritisation of AMR, stakeholder collaboration, and capacity building are essential to overcoming the challenges identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":49197,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Action","volume":"18 1","pages":"2491200"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046612/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Mind the gaps': stakeholder perspectives on addressing antimicrobial resistance in the environment in the Indian context.\",\"authors\":\"Anishka Cameron, John Connolly, Regina Esiovwa, Fiona L Henriquez, Andrew Hursthouse, Suparna Mukherji, Soumyo Mukherji\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/16549716.2025.2491200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is growing global awareness of the pivotal role environmental factors, including pharmaceutical manufacturing waste, play in the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). India bears one of the highest burdens of AMR globally and possesses a substantial manufacturing sector, but limited insight is available on how to practically mitigate environmental AMR-related risk in this context.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand the barriers and opportunities in managing manufacturing waste for addressing AMR in the environment from the perspectives of stakeholders in India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with a range of stakeholders from government, industry, and civil society following a stakeholder mapping and analysis process within the Indian context. We also undertook a series of stakeholder events to inform the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings indicate that 1) Policy action is fragmentary and there are economic and capacity gaps that have implications for industry behaviours; 2) A One Health approach to addressing AMR in the environment requires leadership and that means AMR prevention needs to be institutionalised within government for them to steer, facilitate and coordinate; and 3) There is a need to enhance knowledge amongst policymakers in India about AMR in the environment, and robust 'evidence' is required to foster policy change.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study underscores the need for a multifaceted strategy to address the contribution of pharmaceutical manufacturing waste to AMR in the environment in India. Greater prioritisation of AMR, stakeholder collaboration, and capacity building are essential to overcoming the challenges identified.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Health Action\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"2491200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046612/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Health Action\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2025.2491200\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Action","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2025.2491200","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全球越来越认识到环境因素,包括制药制造废物,在抗菌素耐药性(AMR)的发展和传播中发挥的关键作用。印度是全球抗微生物药物耐药性负担最重的国家之一,拥有庞大的制造业,但在如何切实减轻这种情况下与抗微生物药物耐药性有关的环境风险方面,人们的见解有限。目的:从印度利益相关者的角度了解管理制造废物以解决环境中的AMR的障碍和机会。方法:我们对来自政府、行业和民间社会的一系列利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈,并在印度背景下进行了利益相关者映射和分析过程。我们还开展了一系列的利益相关者活动来为研究提供信息。结果:研究结果表明:1)政策行动是零碎的,存在经济和能力差距,这对行业行为有影响;2)解决环境中抗菌素耐药性的“同一个健康”方法需要领导,这意味着抗菌素耐药性的预防需要在政府内部制度化,以便他们引导、促进和协调;3)有必要提高印度政策制定者对环境中抗生素耐药性的认识,并且需要强有力的“证据”来促进政策变化。结论:该研究强调需要一项多方面的战略来解决印度环境中制药制造废物对抗菌素耐药性的贡献。提高抗菌素耐药性的优先级、利益相关者合作和能力建设对于克服所确定的挑战至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
'Mind the gaps': stakeholder perspectives on addressing antimicrobial resistance in the environment in the Indian context.

Background: There is growing global awareness of the pivotal role environmental factors, including pharmaceutical manufacturing waste, play in the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). India bears one of the highest burdens of AMR globally and possesses a substantial manufacturing sector, but limited insight is available on how to practically mitigate environmental AMR-related risk in this context.

Objective: To understand the barriers and opportunities in managing manufacturing waste for addressing AMR in the environment from the perspectives of stakeholders in India.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with a range of stakeholders from government, industry, and civil society following a stakeholder mapping and analysis process within the Indian context. We also undertook a series of stakeholder events to inform the study.

Results: Our findings indicate that 1) Policy action is fragmentary and there are economic and capacity gaps that have implications for industry behaviours; 2) A One Health approach to addressing AMR in the environment requires leadership and that means AMR prevention needs to be institutionalised within government for them to steer, facilitate and coordinate; and 3) There is a need to enhance knowledge amongst policymakers in India about AMR in the environment, and robust 'evidence' is required to foster policy change.

Conclusions: The study underscores the need for a multifaceted strategy to address the contribution of pharmaceutical manufacturing waste to AMR in the environment in India. Greater prioritisation of AMR, stakeholder collaboration, and capacity building are essential to overcoming the challenges identified.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Health Action
Global Health Action PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
108
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Health Action is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal affiliated with the Unit of Epidemiology and Global Health, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine at Umeå University, Sweden. The Unit hosts the Umeå International School of Public Health and the Umeå Centre for Global Health Research. Vision: Our vision is to be a leading journal in the global health field, narrowing health information gaps and contributing to the implementation of policies and actions that lead to improved global health. Aim: The widening gap between the winners and losers of globalisation presents major public health challenges. To meet these challenges, it is crucial to generate new knowledge and evidence in the field and in settings where the evidence is lacking, as well as to bridge the gaps between existing knowledge and implementation of relevant findings. Thus, the aim of Global Health Action is to contribute to fuelling a more concrete, hands-on approach to addressing global health challenges. Manuscripts suggesting strategies for practical interventions and research implementations where none already exist are specifically welcomed. Further, the journal encourages articles from low- and middle-income countries, while also welcoming articles originated from South-South and South-North collaborations. All articles are expected to address a global agenda and include a strong implementation or policy component.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信