如何区分索引骨科期刊?索引骨科期刊与非索引骨科期刊质量指标的比较分析。

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
JBJS Open Access Pub Date : 2025-04-14 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00166
Alex P Percle, Austin Hansen, Aaron Sheppard, Landon Tujague, Robert W Rutz, Patrick A Massey
{"title":"如何区分索引骨科期刊?索引骨科期刊与非索引骨科期刊质量指标的比较分析。","authors":"Alex P Percle, Austin Hansen, Aaron Sheppard, Landon Tujague, Robert W Rutz, Patrick A Massey","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The PubMed database is used by many organizations as the benchmark for quality publications. This study aimed to identify quality metrics distinguishing orthopaedic journals indexed in PubMed from nonindexed journals. A second aim was to compare metrics of orthopaedic journals indexed in other major databases vs. nonindexed journals. We hypothesized that indexed orthopaedic journals would have several measurable attributes differentiating them from nonindexed journals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A list of all current orthopaedic journals in publication in 2021 was compiled. The journals were characterized based on their index status in PubMed, Master Journal List, Journal Citation Reports (JCR), MEDLINE, or Directory of Open Access Journals. Various journal attributes were collected and compared by indexed status. Each variable's association with indexed journals was determined through statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 478 evaluated journals, 271 were indexed by PubMed. Univariate analysis demonstrated significant associations between PubMed indexing and society affiliation, physician editorial leadership, print version availability, subscription availability, impact factor (IF) listed in JCR, use of Creative Commons licenses, Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) membership, journals that require an article processing charge (APC), and earlier year of first issue (all with p < 0.001). Logistic regression of journals listed in any index demonstrates that COPE membership had the highest impact on indexed status (odds ratio = 34.19; 95% confidence interval 5.69-105.59; p < 0.001). The regression model also demonstrated that society affiliation, subscription availability, MD designation on website for editors, year of first issue, and number of physician editors have significant associations with indexed journals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>COPE membership was the most distinguishing characteristic of indexed orthopaedic journals. Physician editorial leadership and society affiliation were also strong predictors of a journal having an indexed status. In addition, having a print version and/or subscription available, use of Creative Commons licenses, higher IF, longer publication history, and higher APC charge were associated more frequently with indexed journals. Authors should consider these factors when submitting articles to a journal and use caution submitting to journals which do not meet these quality metrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11981467/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Sets Indexed Orthopaedic Journals Apart? A Comparative Analysis of Quality Metrics Between Indexed Orthopaedic Journals and Nonindexed Orthopaedic Journals.\",\"authors\":\"Alex P Percle, Austin Hansen, Aaron Sheppard, Landon Tujague, Robert W Rutz, Patrick A Massey\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The PubMed database is used by many organizations as the benchmark for quality publications. This study aimed to identify quality metrics distinguishing orthopaedic journals indexed in PubMed from nonindexed journals. A second aim was to compare metrics of orthopaedic journals indexed in other major databases vs. nonindexed journals. We hypothesized that indexed orthopaedic journals would have several measurable attributes differentiating them from nonindexed journals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A list of all current orthopaedic journals in publication in 2021 was compiled. The journals were characterized based on their index status in PubMed, Master Journal List, Journal Citation Reports (JCR), MEDLINE, or Directory of Open Access Journals. Various journal attributes were collected and compared by indexed status. Each variable's association with indexed journals was determined through statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 478 evaluated journals, 271 were indexed by PubMed. Univariate analysis demonstrated significant associations between PubMed indexing and society affiliation, physician editorial leadership, print version availability, subscription availability, impact factor (IF) listed in JCR, use of Creative Commons licenses, Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) membership, journals that require an article processing charge (APC), and earlier year of first issue (all with p < 0.001). Logistic regression of journals listed in any index demonstrates that COPE membership had the highest impact on indexed status (odds ratio = 34.19; 95% confidence interval 5.69-105.59; p < 0.001). The regression model also demonstrated that society affiliation, subscription availability, MD designation on website for editors, year of first issue, and number of physician editors have significant associations with indexed journals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>COPE membership was the most distinguishing characteristic of indexed orthopaedic journals. Physician editorial leadership and society affiliation were also strong predictors of a journal having an indexed status. In addition, having a print version and/or subscription available, use of Creative Commons licenses, higher IF, longer publication history, and higher APC charge were associated more frequently with indexed journals. Authors should consider these factors when submitting articles to a journal and use caution submitting to journals which do not meet these quality metrics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBJS Open Access\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11981467/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBJS Open Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:PubMed数据库被许多组织用作质量出版物的基准。本研究旨在确定在PubMed中检索的骨科期刊与未检索的骨科期刊的质量指标。第二个目的是比较在其他主要数据库中被索引的骨科期刊与未被索引的期刊的指标。我们假设被索引的骨科期刊与未被索引的期刊有几个可测量的区别。方法:收集2021年出版的所有骨科期刊。根据期刊在PubMed、Master Journal List、Journal Citation Reports (JCR)、MEDLINE或Open Access journals Directory中的索引状态对期刊进行分类。收集各种日志属性并按索引状态进行比较。通过统计分析确定每个变量与索引期刊的关联。结果:在478份被评估期刊中,有271份被PubMed收录。单变量分析表明,PubMed索引与社会隶属关系、医生编辑领导、印刷版可用性、订阅可用性、JCR中列出的影响因子(IF)、使用创作共用许可、出版伦理委员会(COPE)成员资格、需要文章处理费(APC)的期刊以及首次发行年份之间存在显著关联(均p < 0.001)。对任一索引中收录的期刊进行Logistic回归分析表明,COPE成员资格对收录状态的影响最大(优势比= 34.19;95%置信区间5.69-105.59;P < 0.001)。回归模型还显示,社会隶属关系、订阅可用性、编辑在网站上的医学博士称号、首次出版年份和医师编辑数量与索引期刊有显著关联。结论:COPE收录是骨科期刊收录最显著的特征。医师编辑领导和社会隶属关系也是期刊具有索引地位的有力预测因素。此外,拥有印刷版和/或订阅、使用知识共享许可、更高的影响因子、更长的出版历史和更高的APC费用与索引期刊更频繁地联系在一起。作者在向期刊投稿时应考虑这些因素,对不符合这些质量指标的期刊要谨慎投稿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What Sets Indexed Orthopaedic Journals Apart? A Comparative Analysis of Quality Metrics Between Indexed Orthopaedic Journals and Nonindexed Orthopaedic Journals.

Introduction: The PubMed database is used by many organizations as the benchmark for quality publications. This study aimed to identify quality metrics distinguishing orthopaedic journals indexed in PubMed from nonindexed journals. A second aim was to compare metrics of orthopaedic journals indexed in other major databases vs. nonindexed journals. We hypothesized that indexed orthopaedic journals would have several measurable attributes differentiating them from nonindexed journals.

Methods: A list of all current orthopaedic journals in publication in 2021 was compiled. The journals were characterized based on their index status in PubMed, Master Journal List, Journal Citation Reports (JCR), MEDLINE, or Directory of Open Access Journals. Various journal attributes were collected and compared by indexed status. Each variable's association with indexed journals was determined through statistical analysis.

Results: Of 478 evaluated journals, 271 were indexed by PubMed. Univariate analysis demonstrated significant associations between PubMed indexing and society affiliation, physician editorial leadership, print version availability, subscription availability, impact factor (IF) listed in JCR, use of Creative Commons licenses, Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) membership, journals that require an article processing charge (APC), and earlier year of first issue (all with p < 0.001). Logistic regression of journals listed in any index demonstrates that COPE membership had the highest impact on indexed status (odds ratio = 34.19; 95% confidence interval 5.69-105.59; p < 0.001). The regression model also demonstrated that society affiliation, subscription availability, MD designation on website for editors, year of first issue, and number of physician editors have significant associations with indexed journals.

Conclusion: COPE membership was the most distinguishing characteristic of indexed orthopaedic journals. Physician editorial leadership and society affiliation were also strong predictors of a journal having an indexed status. In addition, having a print version and/or subscription available, use of Creative Commons licenses, higher IF, longer publication history, and higher APC charge were associated more frequently with indexed journals. Authors should consider these factors when submitting articles to a journal and use caution submitting to journals which do not meet these quality metrics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JBJS Open Access
JBJS Open Access Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信