后腹膜镜入路治疗肾上腺外副神经节瘤:单中心经验。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Nihat Aksakal, Berke Sengun, Yalin Iscan, Ismail C Sormaz, Fatih Tunca, Yasemin Giles Senyurek
{"title":"后腹膜镜入路治疗肾上腺外副神经节瘤:单中心经验。","authors":"Nihat Aksakal, Berke Sengun, Yalin Iscan, Ismail C Sormaz, Fatih Tunca, Yasemin Giles Senyurek","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resections performed using the commonly applied minimally invasive transperitoneal approach for extra-adrenal paragangliomas (ePGLs) require a broader dissection area compared with the posterior retroperitoneoscopic approach (PRA) due to the location of the masses, which can elongate the operative time and increase the risk of injury to the adjacent structures. The aim of this case series was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the PRA method, which has very few examples reported in the literature, for the treatment of abdominal paragangliomas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight patients who underwent ePGL resection with PRA in a tertiary center between April 2018 and August 2024 were included. Demographic data, localization relative to the renal vein, operative time, tumor size, perioperative and postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the patients, 4 were male, and 4 were female. The mean age was 49±10.3 years, and the mean body mass index was 27±2.7 kg/m². Tumors were located on the left side in 6 patients and on the right side in 2 patients. Relative to the renal vein, 6 tumors were located superiorly and 2 inferiorly. One patient who had previously undergone surgery through an open anterior approach underwent PRA due to recurrence. The mean operative time was 108.4±20.5 minutes, with perioperative hypotensive episodes observed in 2 patients. No complications were noted during the postoperative follow-up. The mean length of hospital stay was 3.6±1.4 days. The mean tumor size was 34.9±18.6 mm, and the mean follow-up period was 30.5±25.5 months. Disease-related mortality was observed in 1 patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PRA is a safe and feasible minimally invasive method for the treatment of ePGLs.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Posterior Retroperitoneoscopic Approach to Extra-Adrenal Paragangliomas: A Single Center Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Nihat Aksakal, Berke Sengun, Yalin Iscan, Ismail C Sormaz, Fatih Tunca, Yasemin Giles Senyurek\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resections performed using the commonly applied minimally invasive transperitoneal approach for extra-adrenal paragangliomas (ePGLs) require a broader dissection area compared with the posterior retroperitoneoscopic approach (PRA) due to the location of the masses, which can elongate the operative time and increase the risk of injury to the adjacent structures. The aim of this case series was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the PRA method, which has very few examples reported in the literature, for the treatment of abdominal paragangliomas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight patients who underwent ePGL resection with PRA in a tertiary center between April 2018 and August 2024 were included. Demographic data, localization relative to the renal vein, operative time, tumor size, perioperative and postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the patients, 4 were male, and 4 were female. The mean age was 49±10.3 years, and the mean body mass index was 27±2.7 kg/m². Tumors were located on the left side in 6 patients and on the right side in 2 patients. Relative to the renal vein, 6 tumors were located superiorly and 2 inferiorly. One patient who had previously undergone surgery through an open anterior approach underwent PRA due to recurrence. The mean operative time was 108.4±20.5 minutes, with perioperative hypotensive episodes observed in 2 patients. No complications were noted during the postoperative follow-up. The mean length of hospital stay was 3.6±1.4 days. The mean tumor size was 34.9±18.6 mm, and the mean follow-up period was 30.5±25.5 months. Disease-related mortality was observed in 1 patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PRA is a safe and feasible minimally invasive method for the treatment of ePGLs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001367\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001367","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:常用的经腹腔微创入路治疗肾上腺外副神经节瘤(ePGLs),由于肿物的位置,与后腹膜镜入路(PRA)相比,需要更大的清扫面积,这延长了手术时间,增加了损伤邻近结构的风险。本病例系列的目的是评估PRA方法的可行性和安全性,这在文献中报道的例子很少,用于治疗腹部副神经节瘤。方法:纳入2018年4月至2024年8月在三级中心接受ePGL切除术合并PRA的8例患者。评估人口统计学资料、相对于肾静脉的定位、手术时间、肿瘤大小、围手术期和术后并发症以及住院时间。结果:男性4例,女性4例。平均年龄49±10.3岁,平均体重指数27±2.7 kg/m²。肿瘤位于左侧6例,右侧2例。相对于肾静脉,6个肿瘤位于肾静脉上方,2个位于肾静脉下方。1例患者先前通过开放前路手术,因复发而行PRA。平均手术时间108.4±20.5 min, 2例患者出现围手术期低血压发作。术后随访无并发症发生。平均住院时间为3.6±1.4天。平均肿瘤大小34.9±18.6 mm,平均随访30.5±25.5个月。1例患者出现疾病相关死亡。结论:PRA是一种安全可行的治疗epgl的微创方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Posterior Retroperitoneoscopic Approach to Extra-Adrenal Paragangliomas: A Single Center Experience.

Background: Resections performed using the commonly applied minimally invasive transperitoneal approach for extra-adrenal paragangliomas (ePGLs) require a broader dissection area compared with the posterior retroperitoneoscopic approach (PRA) due to the location of the masses, which can elongate the operative time and increase the risk of injury to the adjacent structures. The aim of this case series was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the PRA method, which has very few examples reported in the literature, for the treatment of abdominal paragangliomas.

Methods: Eight patients who underwent ePGL resection with PRA in a tertiary center between April 2018 and August 2024 were included. Demographic data, localization relative to the renal vein, operative time, tumor size, perioperative and postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay were assessed.

Results: Of the patients, 4 were male, and 4 were female. The mean age was 49±10.3 years, and the mean body mass index was 27±2.7 kg/m². Tumors were located on the left side in 6 patients and on the right side in 2 patients. Relative to the renal vein, 6 tumors were located superiorly and 2 inferiorly. One patient who had previously undergone surgery through an open anterior approach underwent PRA due to recurrence. The mean operative time was 108.4±20.5 minutes, with perioperative hypotensive episodes observed in 2 patients. No complications were noted during the postoperative follow-up. The mean length of hospital stay was 3.6±1.4 days. The mean tumor size was 34.9±18.6 mm, and the mean follow-up period was 30.5±25.5 months. Disease-related mortality was observed in 1 patient.

Conclusion: PRA is a safe and feasible minimally invasive method for the treatment of ePGLs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques is a primary source for peer-reviewed, original articles on the newest techniques and applications in operative laparoscopy and endoscopy. Its Editorial Board includes many of the surgeons who pioneered the use of these revolutionary techniques. The journal provides complete, timely, accurate, practical coverage of laparoscopic and endoscopic techniques and procedures; current clinical and basic science research; preoperative and postoperative patient management; complications in laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery; and new developments in instrumentation and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信