{"title":"基于Pauwels角度的未移位股骨颈骨折伴骨质疏松内固定方法的生物力学研究:固定角度装置与三枚空心螺钉。","authors":"Sakura Kuniyoshi, Satoshi Nakasone, Mika Takaesu, Takahiro Igei, Fumiyuki Washizaki, Kotaro Nishida","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2025.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study compared the biomechanical properties of three cannulated screws (3-CSs) and a fixed angle device (FAD) for treating undisplaced femoral neck fracture (FNF) Pauwels types I and III, using finite element analysis (FEA) models created with nonlinear material properties; accurately reflecting the bone quality of osteoporotic patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>FEA involved three patients with a history of undisplaced FNF. Mesh generation was performed using the preoperative CT data. Two internal fixation models:3-CSs and FAD were created for Pauwels type I and III models with a fracture angle of 30° and 70°, respectively. Compression force and relative displacement of the fracture site, and von Mises stress (VMS) of the implants were evaluated. Data analysis involved paired t-test at p < 0.05 statistical level of significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was seen in the compression force between the two implants for Pauwels 30° and 70°models. There was no significant difference in the relative displacement and VMS between the two implants for Pauwels 30° model. However, both relative displacement and VMS were significantly higher in 3-CSs than in FAD for Pauwels 70° model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results indicate the need for FAD when treating Pawels Type III FNF with osteoporosis, since FAD fixation exhibited superior mechanical stability compared to 3-CSs. However, for the Pauwels Type I FNF, both fixation methods provided comparable stability. When considering the implant's simple and minimally invasive features, the clinical use of 3-CSs may be applicable. These findings highlight the importance of evaluating the Pauwels angle when determining the optimal fixation method for undisplaced FNF.</p>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical study of internal fixation methods for undisplaced femoral neck fractures with osteoporosis based on the Pauwels angle: Fixed angle device versus three cannulated screws.\",\"authors\":\"Sakura Kuniyoshi, Satoshi Nakasone, Mika Takaesu, Takahiro Igei, Fumiyuki Washizaki, Kotaro Nishida\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jos.2025.04.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study compared the biomechanical properties of three cannulated screws (3-CSs) and a fixed angle device (FAD) for treating undisplaced femoral neck fracture (FNF) Pauwels types I and III, using finite element analysis (FEA) models created with nonlinear material properties; accurately reflecting the bone quality of osteoporotic patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>FEA involved three patients with a history of undisplaced FNF. Mesh generation was performed using the preoperative CT data. Two internal fixation models:3-CSs and FAD were created for Pauwels type I and III models with a fracture angle of 30° and 70°, respectively. Compression force and relative displacement of the fracture site, and von Mises stress (VMS) of the implants were evaluated. Data analysis involved paired t-test at p < 0.05 statistical level of significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was seen in the compression force between the two implants for Pauwels 30° and 70°models. There was no significant difference in the relative displacement and VMS between the two implants for Pauwels 30° model. However, both relative displacement and VMS were significantly higher in 3-CSs than in FAD for Pauwels 70° model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results indicate the need for FAD when treating Pawels Type III FNF with osteoporosis, since FAD fixation exhibited superior mechanical stability compared to 3-CSs. However, for the Pauwels Type I FNF, both fixation methods provided comparable stability. When considering the implant's simple and minimally invasive features, the clinical use of 3-CSs may be applicable. These findings highlight the importance of evaluating the Pauwels angle when determining the optimal fixation method for undisplaced FNF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2025.04.001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2025.04.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Biomechanical study of internal fixation methods for undisplaced femoral neck fractures with osteoporosis based on the Pauwels angle: Fixed angle device versus three cannulated screws.
Background: This study compared the biomechanical properties of three cannulated screws (3-CSs) and a fixed angle device (FAD) for treating undisplaced femoral neck fracture (FNF) Pauwels types I and III, using finite element analysis (FEA) models created with nonlinear material properties; accurately reflecting the bone quality of osteoporotic patients.
Materials and methods: FEA involved three patients with a history of undisplaced FNF. Mesh generation was performed using the preoperative CT data. Two internal fixation models:3-CSs and FAD were created for Pauwels type I and III models with a fracture angle of 30° and 70°, respectively. Compression force and relative displacement of the fracture site, and von Mises stress (VMS) of the implants were evaluated. Data analysis involved paired t-test at p < 0.05 statistical level of significance.
Results: No significant difference was seen in the compression force between the two implants for Pauwels 30° and 70°models. There was no significant difference in the relative displacement and VMS between the two implants for Pauwels 30° model. However, both relative displacement and VMS were significantly higher in 3-CSs than in FAD for Pauwels 70° model.
Conclusion: Results indicate the need for FAD when treating Pawels Type III FNF with osteoporosis, since FAD fixation exhibited superior mechanical stability compared to 3-CSs. However, for the Pauwels Type I FNF, both fixation methods provided comparable stability. When considering the implant's simple and minimally invasive features, the clinical use of 3-CSs may be applicable. These findings highlight the importance of evaluating the Pauwels angle when determining the optimal fixation method for undisplaced FNF.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.