基于Pauwels角度的未移位股骨颈骨折伴骨质疏松内固定方法的生物力学研究:固定角度装置与三枚空心螺钉。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Sakura Kuniyoshi, Satoshi Nakasone, Mika Takaesu, Takahiro Igei, Fumiyuki Washizaki, Kotaro Nishida
{"title":"基于Pauwels角度的未移位股骨颈骨折伴骨质疏松内固定方法的生物力学研究:固定角度装置与三枚空心螺钉。","authors":"Sakura Kuniyoshi, Satoshi Nakasone, Mika Takaesu, Takahiro Igei, Fumiyuki Washizaki, Kotaro Nishida","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2025.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study compared the biomechanical properties of three cannulated screws (3-CSs) and a fixed angle device (FAD) for treating undisplaced femoral neck fracture (FNF) Pauwels types I and III, using finite element analysis (FEA) models created with nonlinear material properties; accurately reflecting the bone quality of osteoporotic patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>FEA involved three patients with a history of undisplaced FNF. Mesh generation was performed using the preoperative CT data. Two internal fixation models:3-CSs and FAD were created for Pauwels type I and III models with a fracture angle of 30° and 70°, respectively. Compression force and relative displacement of the fracture site, and von Mises stress (VMS) of the implants were evaluated. Data analysis involved paired t-test at p < 0.05 statistical level of significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was seen in the compression force between the two implants for Pauwels 30° and 70°models. There was no significant difference in the relative displacement and VMS between the two implants for Pauwels 30° model. However, both relative displacement and VMS were significantly higher in 3-CSs than in FAD for Pauwels 70° model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results indicate the need for FAD when treating Pawels Type III FNF with osteoporosis, since FAD fixation exhibited superior mechanical stability compared to 3-CSs. However, for the Pauwels Type I FNF, both fixation methods provided comparable stability. When considering the implant's simple and minimally invasive features, the clinical use of 3-CSs may be applicable. These findings highlight the importance of evaluating the Pauwels angle when determining the optimal fixation method for undisplaced FNF.</p>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical study of internal fixation methods for undisplaced femoral neck fractures with osteoporosis based on the Pauwels angle: Fixed angle device versus three cannulated screws.\",\"authors\":\"Sakura Kuniyoshi, Satoshi Nakasone, Mika Takaesu, Takahiro Igei, Fumiyuki Washizaki, Kotaro Nishida\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jos.2025.04.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study compared the biomechanical properties of three cannulated screws (3-CSs) and a fixed angle device (FAD) for treating undisplaced femoral neck fracture (FNF) Pauwels types I and III, using finite element analysis (FEA) models created with nonlinear material properties; accurately reflecting the bone quality of osteoporotic patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>FEA involved three patients with a history of undisplaced FNF. Mesh generation was performed using the preoperative CT data. Two internal fixation models:3-CSs and FAD were created for Pauwels type I and III models with a fracture angle of 30° and 70°, respectively. Compression force and relative displacement of the fracture site, and von Mises stress (VMS) of the implants were evaluated. Data analysis involved paired t-test at p < 0.05 statistical level of significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was seen in the compression force between the two implants for Pauwels 30° and 70°models. There was no significant difference in the relative displacement and VMS between the two implants for Pauwels 30° model. However, both relative displacement and VMS were significantly higher in 3-CSs than in FAD for Pauwels 70° model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results indicate the need for FAD when treating Pawels Type III FNF with osteoporosis, since FAD fixation exhibited superior mechanical stability compared to 3-CSs. However, for the Pauwels Type I FNF, both fixation methods provided comparable stability. When considering the implant's simple and minimally invasive features, the clinical use of 3-CSs may be applicable. These findings highlight the importance of evaluating the Pauwels angle when determining the optimal fixation method for undisplaced FNF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2025.04.001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2025.04.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究利用非线性材料特性建立的有限元分析(FEA)模型,比较了三枚空心螺钉(3-CSs)和固定角度装置(FAD)治疗未移位型股骨颈骨折(Pauwels I型和III型)的生物力学性能;准确反映骨质疏松患者的骨质量。材料和方法:对3例有移位性FNF病史的患者进行有限元分析。利用术前CT数据进行网格生成。对骨折角度为30°和70°的Pauwels I型和III型模型分别制作3-CSs和FAD两种内固定模型。评估骨折部位的压缩力、相对位移、von Mises应力(VMS)。数据分析采用配对t检验p。结果:在30°和70°paulwels模型中,两种种植体的压缩力无显著差异。在Pauwels 30°模型中,两种种植体的相对位移和vm无显著差异。然而,对于Pauwels 70°模型,3-CSs的相对位移和VMS均显著高于FAD。结论:结果表明,在治疗Pawels III型FNF合并骨质疏松症时,FAD是必要的,因为FAD固定比3-CSs具有更好的机械稳定性。然而,对于Pauwels I型FNF,两种固定方法的稳定性相当。考虑到种植体的简单和微创的特点,临床上使用3-CSs可能是可行的。这些发现强调了在确定未移位FNF的最佳固定方法时评估Pauwels角的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biomechanical study of internal fixation methods for undisplaced femoral neck fractures with osteoporosis based on the Pauwels angle: Fixed angle device versus three cannulated screws.

Background: This study compared the biomechanical properties of three cannulated screws (3-CSs) and a fixed angle device (FAD) for treating undisplaced femoral neck fracture (FNF) Pauwels types I and III, using finite element analysis (FEA) models created with nonlinear material properties; accurately reflecting the bone quality of osteoporotic patients.

Materials and methods: FEA involved three patients with a history of undisplaced FNF. Mesh generation was performed using the preoperative CT data. Two internal fixation models:3-CSs and FAD were created for Pauwels type I and III models with a fracture angle of 30° and 70°, respectively. Compression force and relative displacement of the fracture site, and von Mises stress (VMS) of the implants were evaluated. Data analysis involved paired t-test at p < 0.05 statistical level of significance.

Results: No significant difference was seen in the compression force between the two implants for Pauwels 30° and 70°models. There was no significant difference in the relative displacement and VMS between the two implants for Pauwels 30° model. However, both relative displacement and VMS were significantly higher in 3-CSs than in FAD for Pauwels 70° model.

Conclusion: Results indicate the need for FAD when treating Pawels Type III FNF with osteoporosis, since FAD fixation exhibited superior mechanical stability compared to 3-CSs. However, for the Pauwels Type I FNF, both fixation methods provided comparable stability. When considering the implant's simple and minimally invasive features, the clinical use of 3-CSs may be applicable. These findings highlight the importance of evaluating the Pauwels angle when determining the optimal fixation method for undisplaced FNF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Journal of Orthopaedic Science 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信