在半月板切除术随机对照试验中缺少社会经济和人口统计学变量:一项系统评价。

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Mark Kurapatti, Laurel Wong, Ha-Neul Yu, Mateo Restrepo Mejia, Avanish Yendluri, Nikan K Namiri, Dennis Bienstock, Michael Megafu, John D Kelly, Robert L Parisien
{"title":"在半月板切除术随机对照试验中缺少社会经济和人口统计学变量:一项系统评价。","authors":"Mark Kurapatti, Laurel Wong, Ha-Neul Yu, Mateo Restrepo Mejia, Avanish Yendluri, Nikan K Namiri, Dennis Bienstock, Michael Megafu, John D Kelly, Robert L Parisien","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.04.054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to evaluate the inclusion of sociodemographic factors in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on meniscectomy outcomes, with the goal of understanding the extent to which RCTs on meniscectomy consider sociodemographic variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and Medline were queried from January 1, 2014, to October 10, 2024, for meniscectomy RCTs in high-impact journals. Each RCT was assessed for inclusion of the following background and sociodemographic variables: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), race/ethnicity, education level, insurance, smoking/tobacco use, socioeconomic status, marital status, alcohol use, proficiency in country's official language, employment status, and residence status. Temporal trends were analyzed using Fisher exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 301 RCTs screened, 11 reports on unique meniscectomy trials were included. All 11 studies included age. Sex and BMI were included in 10 studies (90.9%). Patients' proficiency in the official language(s) of the study country was only included in 4 studies (36.4%). Employment status was reported in 2 studies (18.2%), and race/ethnicity and smoking/tobacco use were each included in one study (9.1%). Socioeconomic status, residency status, alcohol use, marital status, and insurance were not reported in any included RCT. There was no significant difference in the reporting of at least one sociodemographic variable (excluding age, sex, and BMI) in later studies (2015-2019) versus earlier studies (2020-2024, p=0.061).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our analysis of high-impact meniscectomy RCTs revealed deficient reporting of sociodemographic variables over the last decade. RCTs on meniscectomy outcomes should consistently report key sociodemographic variables to better elucidate the external validity of their findings.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This analysis highlights the historical oversight of sociodemographic factors in meniscectomy trials and thus emphasizes the critical need to incorporate these variables in future orthopedic clinical research to improve the generalizability, utility, and replicability of study findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socioeconomic and Demographic Variables Are Lacking in Meniscectomy Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Mark Kurapatti, Laurel Wong, Ha-Neul Yu, Mateo Restrepo Mejia, Avanish Yendluri, Nikan K Namiri, Dennis Bienstock, Michael Megafu, John D Kelly, Robert L Parisien\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.04.054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to evaluate the inclusion of sociodemographic factors in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on meniscectomy outcomes, with the goal of understanding the extent to which RCTs on meniscectomy consider sociodemographic variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and Medline were queried from January 1, 2014, to October 10, 2024, for meniscectomy RCTs in high-impact journals. Each RCT was assessed for inclusion of the following background and sociodemographic variables: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), race/ethnicity, education level, insurance, smoking/tobacco use, socioeconomic status, marital status, alcohol use, proficiency in country's official language, employment status, and residence status. Temporal trends were analyzed using Fisher exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 301 RCTs screened, 11 reports on unique meniscectomy trials were included. All 11 studies included age. Sex and BMI were included in 10 studies (90.9%). Patients' proficiency in the official language(s) of the study country was only included in 4 studies (36.4%). Employment status was reported in 2 studies (18.2%), and race/ethnicity and smoking/tobacco use were each included in one study (9.1%). Socioeconomic status, residency status, alcohol use, marital status, and insurance were not reported in any included RCT. There was no significant difference in the reporting of at least one sociodemographic variable (excluding age, sex, and BMI) in later studies (2015-2019) versus earlier studies (2020-2024, p=0.061).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our analysis of high-impact meniscectomy RCTs revealed deficient reporting of sociodemographic variables over the last decade. RCTs on meniscectomy outcomes should consistently report key sociodemographic variables to better elucidate the external validity of their findings.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This analysis highlights the historical oversight of sociodemographic factors in meniscectomy trials and thus emphasizes the critical need to incorporate these variables in future orthopedic clinical research to improve the generalizability, utility, and replicability of study findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.04.054\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.04.054","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估半月板切除术结果随机对照试验(rct)中社会人口因素的纳入情况,目的是了解半月板切除术随机对照试验考虑社会人口变量的程度。方法:查询2014年1月1日至2024年10月10日在PubMed、Embase和Medline上发表的高影响力期刊半月板切除术随机对照试验。评估每个RCT是否包含以下背景和社会人口变量:年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、种族/民族、教育水平、保险、吸烟/烟草使用、社会经济地位、婚姻状况、酒精使用、对国家官方语言的熟练程度、就业状况和居住状况。采用Fisher精确检验分析时间趋势。结果:在筛选的301项随机对照试验中,纳入了11项独特的半月板切除术试验报告。所有11项研究都包括了年龄。10项研究(90.9%)纳入性别和BMI。只有4项研究(36.4%)纳入了患者对研究国家官方语言的熟练程度。2项研究报告了就业状况(18.2%),1项研究分别包括种族/民族和吸烟/烟草使用(9.1%)。在任何纳入的随机对照试验中均未报告社会经济地位、居住状况、饮酒情况、婚姻状况和保险情况。在后期研究(2015-2019年)与早期研究(2020-2024年,p=0.061)中,至少有一个社会人口学变量(不包括年龄、性别和BMI)的报告没有显著差异。结论:我们对高影响半月板切除术随机对照试验的分析显示,在过去十年中,社会人口学变量的报告存在缺陷。关于半月板切除术结果的随机对照试验应一致地报告关键的社会人口学变量,以更好地阐明其研究结果的外部有效性。临床相关性:该分析强调了历史上对半月板切除术试验中社会人口学因素的疏忽,因此强调了在未来的骨科临床研究中纳入这些变量的关键需要,以提高研究结果的普遍性、实用性和可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Socioeconomic and Demographic Variables Are Lacking in Meniscectomy Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the inclusion of sociodemographic factors in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on meniscectomy outcomes, with the goal of understanding the extent to which RCTs on meniscectomy consider sociodemographic variables.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Medline were queried from January 1, 2014, to October 10, 2024, for meniscectomy RCTs in high-impact journals. Each RCT was assessed for inclusion of the following background and sociodemographic variables: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), race/ethnicity, education level, insurance, smoking/tobacco use, socioeconomic status, marital status, alcohol use, proficiency in country's official language, employment status, and residence status. Temporal trends were analyzed using Fisher exact test.

Results: Of 301 RCTs screened, 11 reports on unique meniscectomy trials were included. All 11 studies included age. Sex and BMI were included in 10 studies (90.9%). Patients' proficiency in the official language(s) of the study country was only included in 4 studies (36.4%). Employment status was reported in 2 studies (18.2%), and race/ethnicity and smoking/tobacco use were each included in one study (9.1%). Socioeconomic status, residency status, alcohol use, marital status, and insurance were not reported in any included RCT. There was no significant difference in the reporting of at least one sociodemographic variable (excluding age, sex, and BMI) in later studies (2015-2019) versus earlier studies (2020-2024, p=0.061).

Conclusions: Our analysis of high-impact meniscectomy RCTs revealed deficient reporting of sociodemographic variables over the last decade. RCTs on meniscectomy outcomes should consistently report key sociodemographic variables to better elucidate the external validity of their findings.

Clinical relevance: This analysis highlights the historical oversight of sociodemographic factors in meniscectomy trials and thus emphasizes the critical need to incorporate these variables in future orthopedic clinical research to improve the generalizability, utility, and replicability of study findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信