国际多中心对比2型内漏与非2型内漏腹主动脉瘤破裂后血管内修复的早期和晚期预后

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Mario D'Oria, Beatrice Grando, Anna-Leonie Menges, Abdulhakim Ibrahim, Sandro Lepidi, Alexander Oberhuber, Alexander Zimmermann, Benedikt Reutersberg, Alessia D'Andrea, Cristiano Calvagna, Clemens Zippel, Philip Dueppers
{"title":"国际多中心对比2型内漏与非2型内漏腹主动脉瘤破裂后血管内修复的早期和晚期预后","authors":"Mario D'Oria, Beatrice Grando, Anna-Leonie Menges, Abdulhakim Ibrahim, Sandro Lepidi, Alexander Oberhuber, Alexander Zimmermann, Benedikt Reutersberg, Alessia D'Andrea, Cristiano Calvagna, Clemens Zippel, Philip Dueppers","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.04.042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs) remain as a great clinical challenge for vascular surgeons and endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), which is currently regarded as the first-line treatment for rAAA in patients with appropriate anatomy. While recommendations for management of type II endoleaks (T2ELs) are well-established in the elective setting, data after rAAAs are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2018 and December 2022, all patients who were treated with EVAR for rAAA in three tertiary referral centers from different countries (Germany, Italy, and Switzerland) were screened for inclusion in the study. The patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of early T2EL (at completion angiography or at first postoperative computed tomography angiography). The primary end points for this study were 30-day mortality and long-term survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 123 patients were included in the final analysis. Of these, 73 were categorized as not having an early T2EL (group A) and 50 presented an early T2EL (group B). Except for a significantly lower proportion of males in group A as compared with group B (79.5% vs 92%; P = .05), no significant baseline differences were found. At 30 days, the overall mortality rate was not significantly different between study groups (22% vs 16%; P = .16). Using binary regression, the presence of a T2EL was not associated independently with 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 1.712; 95% confidence interval, 0.591-3.964; P = .54). Five-year survival estimates in the whole study cohort did not show any significant difference in patients without a T2EL as compared to those with a T2EL (53% vs 59%; log-rank P = .31). Using Cox proportional hazard regression, the presence of T2ELs was not independently associated with increased risk for long-term mortality (hazard ratio. 1.068; 95% confidence interval, 0.437-2.611; P = .079).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the occurrence of a T2EL seems to be a relatively common scenario after EVAR for rAAA, their presence does not seem to be associated with worse outcomes in the immediate perioperative period or to decrease long-term survival. Therefore, careful observation may be warranted in the early phase, with selective treatment only in cases of ongoing hemodynamic decompensation. In the long run, it seems prudent to assume that the same indication for treatment as for standard EVAR could be recommended in the presence of T2EL.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International multicenter experience on early and late outcomes after endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients with vs without type II endoleaks.\",\"authors\":\"Mario D'Oria, Beatrice Grando, Anna-Leonie Menges, Abdulhakim Ibrahim, Sandro Lepidi, Alexander Oberhuber, Alexander Zimmermann, Benedikt Reutersberg, Alessia D'Andrea, Cristiano Calvagna, Clemens Zippel, Philip Dueppers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.04.042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs) remain as a great clinical challenge for vascular surgeons and endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), which is currently regarded as the first-line treatment for rAAA in patients with appropriate anatomy. While recommendations for management of type II endoleaks (T2ELs) are well-established in the elective setting, data after rAAAs are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2018 and December 2022, all patients who were treated with EVAR for rAAA in three tertiary referral centers from different countries (Germany, Italy, and Switzerland) were screened for inclusion in the study. The patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of early T2EL (at completion angiography or at first postoperative computed tomography angiography). The primary end points for this study were 30-day mortality and long-term survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 123 patients were included in the final analysis. Of these, 73 were categorized as not having an early T2EL (group A) and 50 presented an early T2EL (group B). Except for a significantly lower proportion of males in group A as compared with group B (79.5% vs 92%; P = .05), no significant baseline differences were found. At 30 days, the overall mortality rate was not significantly different between study groups (22% vs 16%; P = .16). Using binary regression, the presence of a T2EL was not associated independently with 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 1.712; 95% confidence interval, 0.591-3.964; P = .54). Five-year survival estimates in the whole study cohort did not show any significant difference in patients without a T2EL as compared to those with a T2EL (53% vs 59%; log-rank P = .31). Using Cox proportional hazard regression, the presence of T2ELs was not independently associated with increased risk for long-term mortality (hazard ratio. 1.068; 95% confidence interval, 0.437-2.611; P = .079).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the occurrence of a T2EL seems to be a relatively common scenario after EVAR for rAAA, their presence does not seem to be associated with worse outcomes in the immediate perioperative period or to decrease long-term survival. Therefore, careful observation may be warranted in the early phase, with selective treatment only in cases of ongoing hemodynamic decompensation. In the long run, it seems prudent to assume that the same indication for treatment as for standard EVAR could be recommended in the presence of T2EL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2025.04.042\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2025.04.042","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹主动脉瘤破裂(rAAAs)仍然是血管外科医生和血管内主动脉修复(EVAR)面临的巨大临床挑战,目前在解剖结构合适的患者中,EVAR被认为是治疗腹主动脉瘤破裂的一线治疗方法。虽然对于2型肾内漏(t2el)的治疗建议在选择性环境中已经建立,但rAAA后的数据有限。方法:2018年1月至2022年12月,筛选来自不同国家(德国、意大利、瑞士)的三个三级转诊中心接受EVAR治疗的所有rAAA患者纳入研究。根据早期T2EL的存在与否(完成血管造影或术后首次计算机断层血管造影)将患者分为两组。这项研究的主要终点是30天死亡率和长期生存率。结果:123例患者纳入最终分析。其中,73人没有早期T2EL (A组),50人出现早期T2EL (B组)。除了a组雄性比例显著低于B组(79.5% vs 92%;P = 0.05),无明显基线差异。30天时,各研究组之间的总死亡率无显著差异(22% vs 16%;p = 16)。使用二元回归,T2EL的存在与30天死亡率没有独立相关性(优势比1.712;95%置信区间0.591-3.964;p = 54)。在整个研究队列中,无T2EL患者的5年生存率与T2EL患者相比没有任何显著差异(53% vs 59%, log rank= 0.31)。使用Cox比例风险回归,t2el的存在与长期死亡风险增加没有独立关联(风险比1.068;95%置信区间0.437-2.611;p = .079)。结论:虽然在rAAA的EVAR后发生T2EL似乎是相对常见的情况,但它们的存在似乎并不与直接围手术期的不良结果相关,也不会降低长期生存率。因此,可能需要在早期阶段仔细观察,只有在持续的血流动力学失代偿的情况下才进行选择性治疗。从长远来看,假设T2EL患者的治疗适应证与标准EVAR的治疗适应证相同似乎是谨慎的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
International multicenter experience on early and late outcomes after endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients with vs without type II endoleaks.

Background: Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs) remain as a great clinical challenge for vascular surgeons and endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), which is currently regarded as the first-line treatment for rAAA in patients with appropriate anatomy. While recommendations for management of type II endoleaks (T2ELs) are well-established in the elective setting, data after rAAAs are limited.

Methods: Between January 2018 and December 2022, all patients who were treated with EVAR for rAAA in three tertiary referral centers from different countries (Germany, Italy, and Switzerland) were screened for inclusion in the study. The patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of early T2EL (at completion angiography or at first postoperative computed tomography angiography). The primary end points for this study were 30-day mortality and long-term survival.

Results: Overall, 123 patients were included in the final analysis. Of these, 73 were categorized as not having an early T2EL (group A) and 50 presented an early T2EL (group B). Except for a significantly lower proportion of males in group A as compared with group B (79.5% vs 92%; P = .05), no significant baseline differences were found. At 30 days, the overall mortality rate was not significantly different between study groups (22% vs 16%; P = .16). Using binary regression, the presence of a T2EL was not associated independently with 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 1.712; 95% confidence interval, 0.591-3.964; P = .54). Five-year survival estimates in the whole study cohort did not show any significant difference in patients without a T2EL as compared to those with a T2EL (53% vs 59%; log-rank P = .31). Using Cox proportional hazard regression, the presence of T2ELs was not independently associated with increased risk for long-term mortality (hazard ratio. 1.068; 95% confidence interval, 0.437-2.611; P = .079).

Conclusions: Although the occurrence of a T2EL seems to be a relatively common scenario after EVAR for rAAA, their presence does not seem to be associated with worse outcomes in the immediate perioperative period or to decrease long-term survival. Therefore, careful observation may be warranted in the early phase, with selective treatment only in cases of ongoing hemodynamic decompensation. In the long run, it seems prudent to assume that the same indication for treatment as for standard EVAR could be recommended in the presence of T2EL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信