在肺癌筛查前提供提醒和教育:多层次方法解决肺癌筛查差异的可行性和可接受性。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Randi M Williams, Julia Whealan, Anu Sangraula, Kathryn L Taylor, Lucile Adams-Campbell, Kristen E Miller, Katharine Glassmeyer, Peyton Yee, Kaylin Camidge, Kristie Foley, George Luta, Kenneth W Lin, Rachelle Barnes, William F DuBoyce
{"title":"在肺癌筛查前提供提醒和教育:多层次方法解决肺癌筛查差异的可行性和可接受性。","authors":"Randi M Williams, Julia Whealan, Anu Sangraula, Kathryn L Taylor, Lucile Adams-Campbell, Kristen E Miller, Katharine Glassmeyer, Peyton Yee, Kaylin Camidge, Kristie Foley, George Luta, Kenneth W Lin, Rachelle Barnes, William F DuBoyce","doi":"10.1093/tbm/ibaf008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>African American individuals experience disparities in the burden of lung cancer compared to other racial or ethnic groups. Yet, African Americans are less likely than White patients to have provider-initiated discussions about lung cancer screening (LCS). In addition to provider-level barriers, predictors of racial disparities include patient-level knowledge barriers and medical mistrust. This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of provider- and patient-oriented approaches to increase uptake of LCS in a majority African American primary care clinic setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In Phase 1, we conducted surveys (N = 22) and usability testing with providers (N = 7) to develop a previsit planning message, a type of clinician reminder. The clinician reminder is sent via the electronic health record ahead of scheduled visits with screening-eligible participants to promote LCS discussion. We partnered with a primary care clinic (N = 5 providers; N = 399 patients 50-80 years old with a documented smoking history, no prior lung cancer diagnosis) to evaluate the impact of the reminder on LCS referral rates. In Phase 2, we conducted a pretest-posttest study (N = 16) to pilot a previsit phone-based patient education session. Patient-level LCS knowledge was assessed using 10 true/false items and a single item measured screening intentions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Phase 1, LCS referrals increased from 6 6-months prepilot to 49 during the 6-month pilot period. The majority (89.8%) of the orders placed had a clinician reminder. In Phase 2, from pretest to posttest, there was improvement in LCS knowledge (mean percent correct: 63.3% to 76.7%; P = .013) and screening intentions (43.8% to 82%; P = .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a diverse clinical setting, we developed a feasible and acceptable multilevel approach aimed at increasing LCS equitably.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial information: </strong>The Clinical Trials Registration #NCT04675476.</p>","PeriodicalId":48679,"journal":{"name":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11997668/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Providing Reminders and Education Prior to lung cancer screening: Feasibility and acceptability of a multilevel approach to address disparities in lung cancer screening.\",\"authors\":\"Randi M Williams, Julia Whealan, Anu Sangraula, Kathryn L Taylor, Lucile Adams-Campbell, Kristen E Miller, Katharine Glassmeyer, Peyton Yee, Kaylin Camidge, Kristie Foley, George Luta, Kenneth W Lin, Rachelle Barnes, William F DuBoyce\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tbm/ibaf008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>African American individuals experience disparities in the burden of lung cancer compared to other racial or ethnic groups. Yet, African Americans are less likely than White patients to have provider-initiated discussions about lung cancer screening (LCS). In addition to provider-level barriers, predictors of racial disparities include patient-level knowledge barriers and medical mistrust. This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of provider- and patient-oriented approaches to increase uptake of LCS in a majority African American primary care clinic setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In Phase 1, we conducted surveys (N = 22) and usability testing with providers (N = 7) to develop a previsit planning message, a type of clinician reminder. The clinician reminder is sent via the electronic health record ahead of scheduled visits with screening-eligible participants to promote LCS discussion. We partnered with a primary care clinic (N = 5 providers; N = 399 patients 50-80 years old with a documented smoking history, no prior lung cancer diagnosis) to evaluate the impact of the reminder on LCS referral rates. In Phase 2, we conducted a pretest-posttest study (N = 16) to pilot a previsit phone-based patient education session. Patient-level LCS knowledge was assessed using 10 true/false items and a single item measured screening intentions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Phase 1, LCS referrals increased from 6 6-months prepilot to 49 during the 6-month pilot period. The majority (89.8%) of the orders placed had a clinician reminder. In Phase 2, from pretest to posttest, there was improvement in LCS knowledge (mean percent correct: 63.3% to 76.7%; P = .013) and screening intentions (43.8% to 82%; P = .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a diverse clinical setting, we developed a feasible and acceptable multilevel approach aimed at increasing LCS equitably.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial information: </strong>The Clinical Trials Registration #NCT04675476.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Behavioral Medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11997668/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Behavioral Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaf008\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaf008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与其他种族或族裔群体相比,非洲裔美国人在肺癌负担方面存在差异。然而,与白人患者相比,非裔美国人更不可能由医生发起关于肺癌筛查(LCS)的讨论。除了提供者层面的障碍外,种族差异的预测因素还包括患者层面的知识障碍和医疗不信任。本研究评估了以提供者和患者为导向的方法的可行性和可接受性,以增加非裔美国人初级保健诊所对LCS的吸收。方法:在第一阶段,我们进行了调查(N = 22)和与供应商(N = 7)的可用性测试,以开发一种预诊计划信息,一种临床医生提醒。临床医生的提醒通过电子健康记录发送到符合筛查条件的参与者的预定访问之前,以促进LCS讨论。我们与一家初级保健诊所合作(N = 5供应商;N = 399例50-80岁、有吸烟史、无肺癌诊断的患者,评估提醒对LCS转诊率的影响。在第2阶段,我们进行了一项前测后测研究(N = 16),以试点基于电话的会诊前患者教育课程。患者层面的LCS知识评估采用10个真/假项目和单个项目测量筛查意图。结果:在第一阶段,LCS转诊从6个月前的6例增加到6个月前的49例。大多数(89.8%)的订单有临床医生提醒。在第2阶段,从测试前到测试后,LCS知识有所改善(平均正确率从63.3%提高到76.7%;P = 0.013)和筛查意向(43.8%至82%;P = 0.05)。结论:在不同的临床环境中,我们开发了一种可行且可接受的多级方法,旨在公平地提高LCS。临床试验信息:临床试验注册号NCT04675476。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Providing Reminders and Education Prior to lung cancer screening: Feasibility and acceptability of a multilevel approach to address disparities in lung cancer screening.

Background: African American individuals experience disparities in the burden of lung cancer compared to other racial or ethnic groups. Yet, African Americans are less likely than White patients to have provider-initiated discussions about lung cancer screening (LCS). In addition to provider-level barriers, predictors of racial disparities include patient-level knowledge barriers and medical mistrust. This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of provider- and patient-oriented approaches to increase uptake of LCS in a majority African American primary care clinic setting.

Methods: In Phase 1, we conducted surveys (N = 22) and usability testing with providers (N = 7) to develop a previsit planning message, a type of clinician reminder. The clinician reminder is sent via the electronic health record ahead of scheduled visits with screening-eligible participants to promote LCS discussion. We partnered with a primary care clinic (N = 5 providers; N = 399 patients 50-80 years old with a documented smoking history, no prior lung cancer diagnosis) to evaluate the impact of the reminder on LCS referral rates. In Phase 2, we conducted a pretest-posttest study (N = 16) to pilot a previsit phone-based patient education session. Patient-level LCS knowledge was assessed using 10 true/false items and a single item measured screening intentions.

Results: In Phase 1, LCS referrals increased from 6 6-months prepilot to 49 during the 6-month pilot period. The majority (89.8%) of the orders placed had a clinician reminder. In Phase 2, from pretest to posttest, there was improvement in LCS knowledge (mean percent correct: 63.3% to 76.7%; P = .013) and screening intentions (43.8% to 82%; P = .05).

Conclusions: In a diverse clinical setting, we developed a feasible and acceptable multilevel approach aimed at increasing LCS equitably.

Clinical trial information: The Clinical Trials Registration #NCT04675476.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Translational Behavioral Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Translational Behavioral Medicine publishes content that engages, informs, and catalyzes dialogue about behavioral medicine among the research, practice, and policy communities. TBM began receiving an Impact Factor in 2015 and currently holds an Impact Factor of 2.989. TBM is one of two journals published by the Society of Behavioral Medicine. The Society of Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary organization of clinicians, educators, and scientists dedicated to promoting the study of the interactions of behavior with biology and the environment, and then applying that knowledge to improve the health and well-being of individuals, families, communities, and populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信