Randi M Williams, Julia Whealan, Anu Sangraula, Kathryn L Taylor, Lucile Adams-Campbell, Kristen E Miller, Katharine Glassmeyer, Peyton Yee, Kaylin Camidge, Kristie Foley, George Luta, Kenneth W Lin, Rachelle Barnes, William F DuBoyce
{"title":"在肺癌筛查前提供提醒和教育:多层次方法解决肺癌筛查差异的可行性和可接受性。","authors":"Randi M Williams, Julia Whealan, Anu Sangraula, Kathryn L Taylor, Lucile Adams-Campbell, Kristen E Miller, Katharine Glassmeyer, Peyton Yee, Kaylin Camidge, Kristie Foley, George Luta, Kenneth W Lin, Rachelle Barnes, William F DuBoyce","doi":"10.1093/tbm/ibaf008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>African American individuals experience disparities in the burden of lung cancer compared to other racial or ethnic groups. Yet, African Americans are less likely than White patients to have provider-initiated discussions about lung cancer screening (LCS). In addition to provider-level barriers, predictors of racial disparities include patient-level knowledge barriers and medical mistrust. This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of provider- and patient-oriented approaches to increase uptake of LCS in a majority African American primary care clinic setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In Phase 1, we conducted surveys (N = 22) and usability testing with providers (N = 7) to develop a previsit planning message, a type of clinician reminder. The clinician reminder is sent via the electronic health record ahead of scheduled visits with screening-eligible participants to promote LCS discussion. We partnered with a primary care clinic (N = 5 providers; N = 399 patients 50-80 years old with a documented smoking history, no prior lung cancer diagnosis) to evaluate the impact of the reminder on LCS referral rates. In Phase 2, we conducted a pretest-posttest study (N = 16) to pilot a previsit phone-based patient education session. Patient-level LCS knowledge was assessed using 10 true/false items and a single item measured screening intentions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Phase 1, LCS referrals increased from 6 6-months prepilot to 49 during the 6-month pilot period. The majority (89.8%) of the orders placed had a clinician reminder. In Phase 2, from pretest to posttest, there was improvement in LCS knowledge (mean percent correct: 63.3% to 76.7%; P = .013) and screening intentions (43.8% to 82%; P = .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a diverse clinical setting, we developed a feasible and acceptable multilevel approach aimed at increasing LCS equitably.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial information: </strong>The Clinical Trials Registration #NCT04675476.</p>","PeriodicalId":48679,"journal":{"name":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11997668/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Providing Reminders and Education Prior to lung cancer screening: Feasibility and acceptability of a multilevel approach to address disparities in lung cancer screening.\",\"authors\":\"Randi M Williams, Julia Whealan, Anu Sangraula, Kathryn L Taylor, Lucile Adams-Campbell, Kristen E Miller, Katharine Glassmeyer, Peyton Yee, Kaylin Camidge, Kristie Foley, George Luta, Kenneth W Lin, Rachelle Barnes, William F DuBoyce\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tbm/ibaf008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>African American individuals experience disparities in the burden of lung cancer compared to other racial or ethnic groups. Yet, African Americans are less likely than White patients to have provider-initiated discussions about lung cancer screening (LCS). In addition to provider-level barriers, predictors of racial disparities include patient-level knowledge barriers and medical mistrust. This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of provider- and patient-oriented approaches to increase uptake of LCS in a majority African American primary care clinic setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In Phase 1, we conducted surveys (N = 22) and usability testing with providers (N = 7) to develop a previsit planning message, a type of clinician reminder. The clinician reminder is sent via the electronic health record ahead of scheduled visits with screening-eligible participants to promote LCS discussion. We partnered with a primary care clinic (N = 5 providers; N = 399 patients 50-80 years old with a documented smoking history, no prior lung cancer diagnosis) to evaluate the impact of the reminder on LCS referral rates. In Phase 2, we conducted a pretest-posttest study (N = 16) to pilot a previsit phone-based patient education session. Patient-level LCS knowledge was assessed using 10 true/false items and a single item measured screening intentions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Phase 1, LCS referrals increased from 6 6-months prepilot to 49 during the 6-month pilot period. The majority (89.8%) of the orders placed had a clinician reminder. In Phase 2, from pretest to posttest, there was improvement in LCS knowledge (mean percent correct: 63.3% to 76.7%; P = .013) and screening intentions (43.8% to 82%; P = .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a diverse clinical setting, we developed a feasible and acceptable multilevel approach aimed at increasing LCS equitably.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial information: </strong>The Clinical Trials Registration #NCT04675476.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Behavioral Medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11997668/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Behavioral Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaf008\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaf008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Providing Reminders and Education Prior to lung cancer screening: Feasibility and acceptability of a multilevel approach to address disparities in lung cancer screening.
Background: African American individuals experience disparities in the burden of lung cancer compared to other racial or ethnic groups. Yet, African Americans are less likely than White patients to have provider-initiated discussions about lung cancer screening (LCS). In addition to provider-level barriers, predictors of racial disparities include patient-level knowledge barriers and medical mistrust. This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of provider- and patient-oriented approaches to increase uptake of LCS in a majority African American primary care clinic setting.
Methods: In Phase 1, we conducted surveys (N = 22) and usability testing with providers (N = 7) to develop a previsit planning message, a type of clinician reminder. The clinician reminder is sent via the electronic health record ahead of scheduled visits with screening-eligible participants to promote LCS discussion. We partnered with a primary care clinic (N = 5 providers; N = 399 patients 50-80 years old with a documented smoking history, no prior lung cancer diagnosis) to evaluate the impact of the reminder on LCS referral rates. In Phase 2, we conducted a pretest-posttest study (N = 16) to pilot a previsit phone-based patient education session. Patient-level LCS knowledge was assessed using 10 true/false items and a single item measured screening intentions.
Results: In Phase 1, LCS referrals increased from 6 6-months prepilot to 49 during the 6-month pilot period. The majority (89.8%) of the orders placed had a clinician reminder. In Phase 2, from pretest to posttest, there was improvement in LCS knowledge (mean percent correct: 63.3% to 76.7%; P = .013) and screening intentions (43.8% to 82%; P = .05).
Conclusions: In a diverse clinical setting, we developed a feasible and acceptable multilevel approach aimed at increasing LCS equitably.
Clinical trial information: The Clinical Trials Registration #NCT04675476.
期刊介绍:
Translational Behavioral Medicine publishes content that engages, informs, and catalyzes dialogue about behavioral medicine among the research, practice, and policy communities. TBM began receiving an Impact Factor in 2015 and currently holds an Impact Factor of 2.989.
TBM is one of two journals published by the Society of Behavioral Medicine. The Society of Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary organization of clinicians, educators, and scientists dedicated to promoting the study of the interactions of behavior with biology and the environment, and then applying that knowledge to improve the health and well-being of individuals, families, communities, and populations.