数学和模拟模型对提高急诊护理质量的有效性:系统文献综述。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Thamer Ahmed Almohaya, James Batchelor, Edilson Arruda
{"title":"数学和模拟模型对提高急诊护理质量的有效性:系统文献综述。","authors":"Thamer Ahmed Almohaya, James Batchelor, Edilson Arruda","doi":"10.1055/a-2591-3930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic literature review aims to critically evaluate the use of mathematical and simulation models within emergency departments (EDs) and assess their potential to improve the quality of care. This review emphasises the critical need for quality enhancement in healthcare systems, specifically focusing on EDs. This review incorporates studies investigating the quality of care provided in ED settings, employing assorted mathematical and simulation models for adult populations. Based on the selected studies, a narrative approach was used to synthesise the findings, focusing on outcome classification, simulation, and modelling. There are six outcome dimensions: safety, effectiveness, patient-centeredness, timeliness, efficiency, and equity. This review analysed 112 studies, uncovering a distinct focus on a set of key performance measures within emergency department (ED) operations, accounting for 222 instances across these studies. Measures assessing timeliness were most frequent, occurring 111 times, indicating a strong emphasis on operational efficiency aspects such as waiting times and patient flow. A total of 75 examinations were conducted on efficiency-related measures, specifically focusing on identifying and addressing operational bottlenecks and optimising resource utilisation. On the other hand, safety, patient-centeredness, and effectiveness were not as commonly represented, with only three, four, and 29 instances, respectively. This review highlights the considerable potential of mathematical and simulation models to enhance ED operations, particularly regarding timeliness and efficiency. However, aspects such as patient safety, effectiveness, and patient-centredness were under-represented, while equity was absent across the studies, indicating a clear need for further research. These findings emphasise the importance of adopting a more thorough approach to evaluating and improving the quality of emergency care. Future research should also concentrate on refining data management practices, incorporating observational studies, and exploring various simulation tools to develop a more balanced and inclusive understanding of these models' applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of mathematical and simulation models for Improving Quality of Care in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Literature Review.\",\"authors\":\"Thamer Ahmed Almohaya, James Batchelor, Edilson Arruda\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2591-3930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This systematic literature review aims to critically evaluate the use of mathematical and simulation models within emergency departments (EDs) and assess their potential to improve the quality of care. This review emphasises the critical need for quality enhancement in healthcare systems, specifically focusing on EDs. This review incorporates studies investigating the quality of care provided in ED settings, employing assorted mathematical and simulation models for adult populations. Based on the selected studies, a narrative approach was used to synthesise the findings, focusing on outcome classification, simulation, and modelling. There are six outcome dimensions: safety, effectiveness, patient-centeredness, timeliness, efficiency, and equity. This review analysed 112 studies, uncovering a distinct focus on a set of key performance measures within emergency department (ED) operations, accounting for 222 instances across these studies. Measures assessing timeliness were most frequent, occurring 111 times, indicating a strong emphasis on operational efficiency aspects such as waiting times and patient flow. A total of 75 examinations were conducted on efficiency-related measures, specifically focusing on identifying and addressing operational bottlenecks and optimising resource utilisation. On the other hand, safety, patient-centeredness, and effectiveness were not as commonly represented, with only three, four, and 29 instances, respectively. This review highlights the considerable potential of mathematical and simulation models to enhance ED operations, particularly regarding timeliness and efficiency. However, aspects such as patient safety, effectiveness, and patient-centredness were under-represented, while equity was absent across the studies, indicating a clear need for further research. These findings emphasise the importance of adopting a more thorough approach to evaluating and improving the quality of emergency care. Future research should also concentrate on refining data management practices, incorporating observational studies, and exploring various simulation tools to develop a more balanced and inclusive understanding of these models' applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2591-3930\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2591-3930","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本系统的文献综述旨在批判性地评估数学和模拟模型在急诊科(EDs)中的使用,并评估其提高护理质量的潜力。这篇综述强调了提高卫生保健系统质量的迫切需要,特别是对急诊科的关注。这篇综述纳入了调查急诊科提供的护理质量的研究,采用了成人人群的各种数学和模拟模型。根据选定的研究,采用叙述方法综合研究结果,重点是结果分类、模拟和建模。有六个结果维度:安全性、有效性、以患者为中心、及时性、效率和公平性。本综述分析了112项研究,揭示了对急诊科(ED)业务中一系列关键绩效指标的独特关注,占这些研究中的222个实例。评估及时性的措施最为频繁,出现了111次,表明非常重视操作效率方面,如等待时间和病人流量。在与效率有关的措施方面,共进行了75次检查,特别侧重于查明和解决业务瓶颈,以及优化资源利用。另一方面,安全性、以患者为中心和有效性并不常见,分别只有3例、4例和29例。这篇综述强调了数学和模拟模型在提高ED操作方面的巨大潜力,特别是在及时性和效率方面。然而,诸如患者安全性、有效性和以患者为中心等方面的研究没有得到充分的代表,而所有研究都缺乏公平性,这表明需要进一步的研究。这些发现强调了采用更彻底的方法来评估和提高急诊护理质量的重要性。未来的研究还应该集中在改进数据管理实践,结合观察研究,探索各种模拟工具,以发展对这些模型应用的更平衡和包容的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of mathematical and simulation models for Improving Quality of Care in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Literature Review.

This systematic literature review aims to critically evaluate the use of mathematical and simulation models within emergency departments (EDs) and assess their potential to improve the quality of care. This review emphasises the critical need for quality enhancement in healthcare systems, specifically focusing on EDs. This review incorporates studies investigating the quality of care provided in ED settings, employing assorted mathematical and simulation models for adult populations. Based on the selected studies, a narrative approach was used to synthesise the findings, focusing on outcome classification, simulation, and modelling. There are six outcome dimensions: safety, effectiveness, patient-centeredness, timeliness, efficiency, and equity. This review analysed 112 studies, uncovering a distinct focus on a set of key performance measures within emergency department (ED) operations, accounting for 222 instances across these studies. Measures assessing timeliness were most frequent, occurring 111 times, indicating a strong emphasis on operational efficiency aspects such as waiting times and patient flow. A total of 75 examinations were conducted on efficiency-related measures, specifically focusing on identifying and addressing operational bottlenecks and optimising resource utilisation. On the other hand, safety, patient-centeredness, and effectiveness were not as commonly represented, with only three, four, and 29 instances, respectively. This review highlights the considerable potential of mathematical and simulation models to enhance ED operations, particularly regarding timeliness and efficiency. However, aspects such as patient safety, effectiveness, and patient-centredness were under-represented, while equity was absent across the studies, indicating a clear need for further research. These findings emphasise the importance of adopting a more thorough approach to evaluating and improving the quality of emergency care. Future research should also concentrate on refining data management practices, incorporating observational studies, and exploring various simulation tools to develop a more balanced and inclusive understanding of these models' applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信