Derek D George, Manlin Shao, Jerry M Brown, Marisa DiMarzio, Martin E Weinand, Paul S Larson, Willard S Kasoff, Julie G Pilitsis
{"title":"探索西班牙裔人群功能性神经外科手术的发生率:2017年至2024年的单机构分析","authors":"Derek D George, Manlin Shao, Jerry M Brown, Marisa DiMarzio, Martin E Weinand, Paul S Larson, Willard S Kasoff, Julie G Pilitsis","doi":"10.1016/j.neurom.2025.03.077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Racial and ethnic disparities in utilization of functional neurosurgical procedures have been extensively documented. However, few studies have focused on the differences between Hispanic and non-Hispanic White populations in regions with high representation of both groups. Given the large Hispanic population within our hospital's catchment area, we aimed to compare the utilization of functional neurosurgery between the Hispanic and White populations in our practice.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing functional neurosurgery procedures from 2017 to 2024 at the University of Arizona in Tucson. Rates of epilepsy, pain, and movement disorder procedures were compared by ethnicity, focusing on Hispanic vs non-Hispanic White populations. Correlations with age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, income, insurance status, distance from the treatment center, and complications were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 750 procedures were performed among 702 patients. Deep brain stimulation accounted for 27.73% of procedures, spinal cord stimulation for 35.87%, epilepsy surgery for 22.53%, and intrathecal pump placement for 13.7%. Among the included patients, 43.3% were treated for chronic pain, 22.5% for epilepsy, 18.1% for Parkinson's disease, 4.8% for essential tremor, 2.3% for spasticity, 0.9% for dystonia, and 8.0% for other/unknown diagnoses. Regarding ethnicity, 74.3% of our cohort identified as non-Hispanic White, 18.1% as Hispanic, and 7.6% as other or unknown ethnicity. Hispanic patients were significantly underrepresented relative to Southern Arizona demographics (χ<sup>2</sup> [1, n = 693] = 280.38, p < 0.0001, ϕ=0.64). This disparity was consistent and significant across all procedure types. Significant differences in five-year median inflation-adjusted household income were observed between Hispanic and White non-Hispanic groups (Welch t-test [n = 693] = 5.79, p < 0.0001, Cohen d = 0.53). Cluster analysis revealed four distinct clusters based on multiple predictors, and multinomial regression identified several significant predictors of undergoing each procedure type.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Functional procedures are underutilized among Hispanic patients in Southern Arizona, with disparities associated with age, income, and distance from the treatment center.</p>","PeriodicalId":19152,"journal":{"name":"Neuromodulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Rates of Functional Neurosurgery Procedures in the Hispanic Population: A Single-Institution Analysis From 2017 to 2024.\",\"authors\":\"Derek D George, Manlin Shao, Jerry M Brown, Marisa DiMarzio, Martin E Weinand, Paul S Larson, Willard S Kasoff, Julie G Pilitsis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neurom.2025.03.077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Racial and ethnic disparities in utilization of functional neurosurgical procedures have been extensively documented. However, few studies have focused on the differences between Hispanic and non-Hispanic White populations in regions with high representation of both groups. Given the large Hispanic population within our hospital's catchment area, we aimed to compare the utilization of functional neurosurgery between the Hispanic and White populations in our practice.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing functional neurosurgery procedures from 2017 to 2024 at the University of Arizona in Tucson. Rates of epilepsy, pain, and movement disorder procedures were compared by ethnicity, focusing on Hispanic vs non-Hispanic White populations. Correlations with age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, income, insurance status, distance from the treatment center, and complications were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 750 procedures were performed among 702 patients. Deep brain stimulation accounted for 27.73% of procedures, spinal cord stimulation for 35.87%, epilepsy surgery for 22.53%, and intrathecal pump placement for 13.7%. Among the included patients, 43.3% were treated for chronic pain, 22.5% for epilepsy, 18.1% for Parkinson's disease, 4.8% for essential tremor, 2.3% for spasticity, 0.9% for dystonia, and 8.0% for other/unknown diagnoses. Regarding ethnicity, 74.3% of our cohort identified as non-Hispanic White, 18.1% as Hispanic, and 7.6% as other or unknown ethnicity. Hispanic patients were significantly underrepresented relative to Southern Arizona demographics (χ<sup>2</sup> [1, n = 693] = 280.38, p < 0.0001, ϕ=0.64). This disparity was consistent and significant across all procedure types. Significant differences in five-year median inflation-adjusted household income were observed between Hispanic and White non-Hispanic groups (Welch t-test [n = 693] = 5.79, p < 0.0001, Cohen d = 0.53). Cluster analysis revealed four distinct clusters based on multiple predictors, and multinomial regression identified several significant predictors of undergoing each procedure type.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Functional procedures are underutilized among Hispanic patients in Southern Arizona, with disparities associated with age, income, and distance from the treatment center.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuromodulation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuromodulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2025.03.077\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuromodulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2025.03.077","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
引言:功能性神经外科手术的种族和民族差异已被广泛记载。然而,很少有研究关注西班牙裔和非西班牙裔白人在两个群体都有较高代表性的地区之间的差异。考虑到我们医院的集水区有大量的西班牙裔人口,我们的目的是比较西班牙裔和白人在我们的实践中对功能性神经外科的利用。材料和方法:我们对图森亚利桑那大学2017年至2024年接受功能性神经外科手术的患者进行了回顾性研究。癫痫、疼痛和运动障碍手术的发生率按种族进行比较,重点是西班牙裔和非西班牙裔白人人群。研究结果与年龄、美国麻醉医师协会级别、收入、保险状况、离治疗中心的距离和并发症的关系。结果:702例患者共进行了750例手术。脑深部刺激占27.73%,脊髓刺激占35.87%,癫痫手术占22.53%,鞘内泵放置占13.7%。在纳入的患者中,慢性疼痛占43.3%,癫痫占22.5%,帕金森病占18.1%,特发性震颤占4.8%,痉挛占2.3%,肌张力障碍占0.9%,其他/未知诊断占8.0%。在种族方面,74.3%的研究对象为非西班牙裔白人,18.1%为西班牙裔,7.6%为其他或未知种族。与南亚利桑那州相比,西班牙裔患者的代表性明显不足(χ2 [1, n = 693] = 280.38, p < 0.0001, ϕ=0.64)。这种差异在所有手术类型中都是一致且显著的。在西班牙裔和非西班牙裔白人群体中,经通胀调整后的5年家庭收入中位数存在显著差异(Welch t检验[n = 693] = 5.79, p < 0.0001, Cohen d = 0.53)。聚类分析显示基于多个预测因子的四个不同的聚类,多项回归确定了接受每种手术类型的几个显著预测因子。讨论:功能性手术在南亚利桑那州的西班牙裔患者中未被充分利用,存在与年龄、收入和与治疗中心的距离相关的差异。
Exploring Rates of Functional Neurosurgery Procedures in the Hispanic Population: A Single-Institution Analysis From 2017 to 2024.
Introduction: Racial and ethnic disparities in utilization of functional neurosurgical procedures have been extensively documented. However, few studies have focused on the differences between Hispanic and non-Hispanic White populations in regions with high representation of both groups. Given the large Hispanic population within our hospital's catchment area, we aimed to compare the utilization of functional neurosurgery between the Hispanic and White populations in our practice.
Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing functional neurosurgery procedures from 2017 to 2024 at the University of Arizona in Tucson. Rates of epilepsy, pain, and movement disorder procedures were compared by ethnicity, focusing on Hispanic vs non-Hispanic White populations. Correlations with age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, income, insurance status, distance from the treatment center, and complications were examined.
Results: A total of 750 procedures were performed among 702 patients. Deep brain stimulation accounted for 27.73% of procedures, spinal cord stimulation for 35.87%, epilepsy surgery for 22.53%, and intrathecal pump placement for 13.7%. Among the included patients, 43.3% were treated for chronic pain, 22.5% for epilepsy, 18.1% for Parkinson's disease, 4.8% for essential tremor, 2.3% for spasticity, 0.9% for dystonia, and 8.0% for other/unknown diagnoses. Regarding ethnicity, 74.3% of our cohort identified as non-Hispanic White, 18.1% as Hispanic, and 7.6% as other or unknown ethnicity. Hispanic patients were significantly underrepresented relative to Southern Arizona demographics (χ2 [1, n = 693] = 280.38, p < 0.0001, ϕ=0.64). This disparity was consistent and significant across all procedure types. Significant differences in five-year median inflation-adjusted household income were observed between Hispanic and White non-Hispanic groups (Welch t-test [n = 693] = 5.79, p < 0.0001, Cohen d = 0.53). Cluster analysis revealed four distinct clusters based on multiple predictors, and multinomial regression identified several significant predictors of undergoing each procedure type.
Discussion: Functional procedures are underutilized among Hispanic patients in Southern Arizona, with disparities associated with age, income, and distance from the treatment center.
期刊介绍:
Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface is the preeminent journal in the area of neuromodulation, providing our readership with the state of the art clinical, translational, and basic science research in the field. For clinicians, engineers, scientists and members of the biotechnology industry alike, Neuromodulation provides timely and rigorously peer-reviewed articles on the technology, science, and clinical application of devices that interface with the nervous system to treat disease and improve function.