David J Winchester, Lavisha Singh, Stephen B Edge, Kimberly H Allison, William E Barlow, Veerle Bossuyt, Mariana Chavez-MacGregor, Emily F Conant, James L Connolly, Jennifer F De Los Santos, Daniel F Hayes, Nola M Hylton, Elizabeth A Mittendorf, Jennifer K Plichta, Elena Provenzano, Kilian E Salerno, Priyanka Sharma, W Fraser Symmans, Donald Weaver, Gabriel N Hortobagyi
{"title":"新型乳腺癌新辅助后预后分期系统。","authors":"David J Winchester, Lavisha Singh, Stephen B Edge, Kimberly H Allison, William E Barlow, Veerle Bossuyt, Mariana Chavez-MacGregor, Emily F Conant, James L Connolly, Jennifer F De Los Santos, Daniel F Hayes, Nola M Hylton, Elizabeth A Mittendorf, Jennifer K Plichta, Elena Provenzano, Kilian E Salerno, Priyanka Sharma, W Fraser Symmans, Donald Weaver, Gabriel N Hortobagyi","doi":"10.1200/JCO-24-01739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Prognostic staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is not included in American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) staging. This study addressed this deficiency by including responses to therapy with standardized staging variables in a validated prognostic staging system for patients treated with NACT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The National Cancer Database was queried to identify 140,605 patients treated with NACT between 2010 and 2018. Three response categories (no response, partial response, and complete response [pCR]) were created on the basis of comparison of clinical and post-NACT pathologic staging. Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinical stage, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and grade were analyzed for each category. Predictive models for each response category were validated using the bootstrap technique. Calibration plots compared predicted and observed 3-year survival probabilities in the training and validation data sets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each validated model demonstrated statistically significant survival differences in the postneoadjuvant prognostic stage assignment. Of all patients with a pCR, 94.2% were assigned to postneoadjuvant ypStage I compared with 35.5% of patients with no response. Advancing clinical stage had a progressive but small impact on overall survival (OS) with pCR (high-grade, triple-negative breast cancer [TNBC]: cStage I, 97% <i>v</i> cStage IIIB/IIIC, 91%; grade 2 luminal A: 97% <i>v</i> 91%) but was associated with a profound decrease in OS with no response for TNBC or HER2+ disease (high-grade TNBC 89% <i>v</i> 50%) and less profound for grade 2 luminal A disease with no response (97% <i>v</i> 81%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We present a novel, validated prognostic staging system that predicts OS according to the response to NACT. These data will provide AJCC stage assignments for a growing proportion of patients treated with NACT.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"JCO2401739"},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel Postneoadjuvant Prognostic Breast Cancer Staging System.\",\"authors\":\"David J Winchester, Lavisha Singh, Stephen B Edge, Kimberly H Allison, William E Barlow, Veerle Bossuyt, Mariana Chavez-MacGregor, Emily F Conant, James L Connolly, Jennifer F De Los Santos, Daniel F Hayes, Nola M Hylton, Elizabeth A Mittendorf, Jennifer K Plichta, Elena Provenzano, Kilian E Salerno, Priyanka Sharma, W Fraser Symmans, Donald Weaver, Gabriel N Hortobagyi\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/JCO-24-01739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Prognostic staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is not included in American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) staging. This study addressed this deficiency by including responses to therapy with standardized staging variables in a validated prognostic staging system for patients treated with NACT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The National Cancer Database was queried to identify 140,605 patients treated with NACT between 2010 and 2018. Three response categories (no response, partial response, and complete response [pCR]) were created on the basis of comparison of clinical and post-NACT pathologic staging. Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinical stage, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and grade were analyzed for each category. Predictive models for each response category were validated using the bootstrap technique. Calibration plots compared predicted and observed 3-year survival probabilities in the training and validation data sets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each validated model demonstrated statistically significant survival differences in the postneoadjuvant prognostic stage assignment. Of all patients with a pCR, 94.2% were assigned to postneoadjuvant ypStage I compared with 35.5% of patients with no response. Advancing clinical stage had a progressive but small impact on overall survival (OS) with pCR (high-grade, triple-negative breast cancer [TNBC]: cStage I, 97% <i>v</i> cStage IIIB/IIIC, 91%; grade 2 luminal A: 97% <i>v</i> 91%) but was associated with a profound decrease in OS with no response for TNBC or HER2+ disease (high-grade TNBC 89% <i>v</i> 50%) and less profound for grade 2 luminal A disease with no response (97% <i>v</i> 81%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We present a novel, validated prognostic staging system that predicts OS according to the response to NACT. These data will provide AJCC stage assignments for a growing proportion of patients treated with NACT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"JCO2401739\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":42.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-01739\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-01739","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:新辅助化疗(NACT)后的预后分期不包括在美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期中。本研究通过在NACT治疗患者的有效预后分期系统中纳入标准化分期变量的治疗反应来解决这一缺陷。方法:查询国家癌症数据库,确定2010年至2018年期间接受NACT治疗的140605例患者。根据临床和nact后病理分期的比较,建立无反应、部分反应和完全反应[pCR]三个反应类别。对各分类的临床分期、雌激素受体、孕激素受体、人表皮生长因子受体2 (HER2)及分级进行单因素和多因素分析。每个响应类别的预测模型使用自举技术进行验证。校准图比较了训练和验证数据集中预测和观察到的3年生存率。结果:每个验证的模型在新辅助后预后分期分配中显示出统计学上显著的生存差异。在所有pCR患者中,94.2%被分配到新辅助后的ypStage I,而无反应的患者中这一比例为35.5%。临床分期的推进对pCR总生存率(OS)的影响渐进式但较小(高级别三阴性乳腺癌[TNBC]: ci期,97% vs ciiib /IIIC期,91%;2级腔内A: 97% v 91%),但与TNBC或HER2+疾病(高级别TNBC 89% v 50%)和2级腔内A疾病(无反应97% v 81%)的OS显著降低相关。结论:我们提出了一种新的、经过验证的预后分期系统,根据对NACT的反应来预测OS。这些数据将为越来越多接受NACT治疗的患者提供AJCC分期分配。
Novel Postneoadjuvant Prognostic Breast Cancer Staging System.
Purpose: Prognostic staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is not included in American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) staging. This study addressed this deficiency by including responses to therapy with standardized staging variables in a validated prognostic staging system for patients treated with NACT.
Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried to identify 140,605 patients treated with NACT between 2010 and 2018. Three response categories (no response, partial response, and complete response [pCR]) were created on the basis of comparison of clinical and post-NACT pathologic staging. Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinical stage, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and grade were analyzed for each category. Predictive models for each response category were validated using the bootstrap technique. Calibration plots compared predicted and observed 3-year survival probabilities in the training and validation data sets.
Results: Each validated model demonstrated statistically significant survival differences in the postneoadjuvant prognostic stage assignment. Of all patients with a pCR, 94.2% were assigned to postneoadjuvant ypStage I compared with 35.5% of patients with no response. Advancing clinical stage had a progressive but small impact on overall survival (OS) with pCR (high-grade, triple-negative breast cancer [TNBC]: cStage I, 97% v cStage IIIB/IIIC, 91%; grade 2 luminal A: 97% v 91%) but was associated with a profound decrease in OS with no response for TNBC or HER2+ disease (high-grade TNBC 89% v 50%) and less profound for grade 2 luminal A disease with no response (97% v 81%).
Conclusion: We present a novel, validated prognostic staging system that predicts OS according to the response to NACT. These data will provide AJCC stage assignments for a growing proportion of patients treated with NACT.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.