心理治疗患者认知知觉障碍(Copeds)筛查工具的开发与心理测量学评价。

IF 2.6 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Mikkel Eielsen, Pål Gunnar Ulvenes, Linne Melsom, Bruce E Wampold, Jan Ivar Røssberg, Filip Myhre, Øystein Sørensen, Susanna Memmen Rasch, Allan Abbass
{"title":"心理治疗患者认知知觉障碍(Copeds)筛查工具的开发与心理测量学评价。","authors":"Mikkel Eielsen, Pål Gunnar Ulvenes, Linne Melsom, Bruce E Wampold, Jan Ivar Røssberg, Filip Myhre, Øystein Sørensen, Susanna Memmen Rasch, Allan Abbass","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2025.2495773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cognitive perceptual disruption (CPD) is an emotion regulation mechanism described in intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy (ISTDP) that distinguishes fragile patients from resistant ones. CPD functions as an involuntary avoidance-based mechanism that prevents engagement with distressing emotions, making its identification crucial for guiding treatment. Currently, CPD assessment relies solely on clinical psychodiagnostic evaluation, with no available psychometric instruments. This study introduces a cognitive perceptual disruption screening instrument (Copeds), a self-report measure designed to identify CPD and assist in treatment planning for emotion-focused therapies.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted to develop Copeds, evaluate its ability to distinguish between fragile and resistant patients, and examine its preliminary psychometric properties. 112 outpatients underwent clinical psychodiagnostic evaluation and completed Copeds. Regularized regression techniques, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and analyses of internal consistency and sensitivity/specificity were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final instrument contained 19 psychometric items that strongly discriminated between fragile and resistant patients. ROC analysis yielded an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.88. Sensitivity was 91.4%<b>,</b> and specificity was 76.4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study provides promising initial evidence for Copeds as a reliable instrument with strong classification accuracy, supporting its potential use in clinical assessment and treatment planning for emotion-focused therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and psychometric evaluation of a screening instrument for cognitive perceptual disruption (Copeds) in psychotherapy patients.\",\"authors\":\"Mikkel Eielsen, Pål Gunnar Ulvenes, Linne Melsom, Bruce E Wampold, Jan Ivar Røssberg, Filip Myhre, Øystein Sørensen, Susanna Memmen Rasch, Allan Abbass\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10503307.2025.2495773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cognitive perceptual disruption (CPD) is an emotion regulation mechanism described in intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy (ISTDP) that distinguishes fragile patients from resistant ones. CPD functions as an involuntary avoidance-based mechanism that prevents engagement with distressing emotions, making its identification crucial for guiding treatment. Currently, CPD assessment relies solely on clinical psychodiagnostic evaluation, with no available psychometric instruments. This study introduces a cognitive perceptual disruption screening instrument (Copeds), a self-report measure designed to identify CPD and assist in treatment planning for emotion-focused therapies.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted to develop Copeds, evaluate its ability to distinguish between fragile and resistant patients, and examine its preliminary psychometric properties. 112 outpatients underwent clinical psychodiagnostic evaluation and completed Copeds. Regularized regression techniques, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and analyses of internal consistency and sensitivity/specificity were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final instrument contained 19 psychometric items that strongly discriminated between fragile and resistant patients. ROC analysis yielded an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.88. Sensitivity was 91.4%<b>,</b> and specificity was 76.4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study provides promising initial evidence for Copeds as a reliable instrument with strong classification accuracy, supporting its potential use in clinical assessment and treatment planning for emotion-focused therapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapy Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2025.2495773\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2025.2495773","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:认知知觉干扰(CPD)是短期强化动态心理治疗(ISTDP)中描述的一种情绪调节机制,它能区分脆弱患者和抵抗患者。CPD的功能是一种基于非自愿回避的机制,可以防止与痛苦情绪的接触,因此对其识别对于指导治疗至关重要。目前,CPD评估仅依赖于临床心理诊断评估,没有可用的心理测量工具。本研究介绍了一种认知知觉中断筛查工具(Copeds),这是一种自我报告测量,旨在识别CPD并协助制定以情绪为中心的治疗计划。方法:采用横断面研究开发Copeds,评估其区分脆弱和抵抗患者的能力,并检查其初步心理测量特性。112例门诊患者接受了临床心理诊断评估并完成了copds。进行了正则化回归技术、受试者工作特征(ROC)分析以及内部一致性和敏感性/特异性分析。结果:最终量表包含19个心理测量项目,对脆弱患者和抵抗患者有较强的区分。ROC分析得出曲线下面积(AUC)值为0.88。敏感性为91.4%,特异性为76.4%。结论:本研究为Copeds作为一种可靠的分类工具提供了初步证据,支持其在情绪治疗的临床评估和治疗计划中的潜在应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and psychometric evaluation of a screening instrument for cognitive perceptual disruption (Copeds) in psychotherapy patients.

Objective: Cognitive perceptual disruption (CPD) is an emotion regulation mechanism described in intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy (ISTDP) that distinguishes fragile patients from resistant ones. CPD functions as an involuntary avoidance-based mechanism that prevents engagement with distressing emotions, making its identification crucial for guiding treatment. Currently, CPD assessment relies solely on clinical psychodiagnostic evaluation, with no available psychometric instruments. This study introduces a cognitive perceptual disruption screening instrument (Copeds), a self-report measure designed to identify CPD and assist in treatment planning for emotion-focused therapies.

Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted to develop Copeds, evaluate its ability to distinguish between fragile and resistant patients, and examine its preliminary psychometric properties. 112 outpatients underwent clinical psychodiagnostic evaluation and completed Copeds. Regularized regression techniques, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and analyses of internal consistency and sensitivity/specificity were performed.

Results: The final instrument contained 19 psychometric items that strongly discriminated between fragile and resistant patients. ROC analysis yielded an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.88. Sensitivity was 91.4%, and specificity was 76.4%.

Conclusion: The study provides promising initial evidence for Copeds as a reliable instrument with strong classification accuracy, supporting its potential use in clinical assessment and treatment planning for emotion-focused therapies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychotherapy Research
Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
10.30%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Research seeks to enhance the development, scientific quality, and social relevance of psychotherapy research and to foster the use of research findings in practice, education, and policy formulation. The Journal publishes reports of original research on all aspects of psychotherapy, including its outcomes, its processes, education of practitioners, and delivery of services. It also publishes methodological, theoretical, and review articles of direct relevance to psychotherapy research. The Journal is addressed to an international, interdisciplinary audience and welcomes submissions dealing with diverse theoretical orientations, treatment modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信