Dina Yousry, Raafat Riad, Rehab A Soliman, Mohamed ElSholkamy
{"title":"臭氧凝胶在骨化后是否能提高种植体周围骨的宽度和颊板厚度?一项随机对照临床试验。","authors":"Dina Yousry, Raafat Riad, Rehab A Soliman, Mohamed ElSholkamy","doi":"10.1007/s10006-025-01367-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of using ozone gel with transcrestal sinus elevation using osteotomes, on the bone width and the buccal plate of bone thickness around the implants placed simultaneously.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 30 sinuses with an average residual alveolar bone height ranging from 4-7 mm participated in this randomized controlled clinical trial. Following a closed sinus lift procedure, patients were randomized into two groups: one for the ozone gel recipient group and the other for control group. Cone beam computed tomography was carried out both immediately and four months postoperatively. Radiographic evaluations were performed to assess bone width and labial plate thickness at both crestal and midcrestal levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Radiographic analysis revealed that the mean bone width of the control group after four months postoperative was (8.54 ± 1.46 mm) compared to (8.96 ± 1.66 mm) in the study group, which was statistically insignificant (P ≤ .0.05). The mean labial plate of bone thickness value of the control group after four months postoperative was (1.86 ± 0.63 mm) compared to (1.89 ± 0.51 mm) in the study group. Although the bone dimensions in the study group was higher than the control group, it was statistically insignificant (P ≤ .0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When compared to the graftless group, the ozone gel recipient group showed non-significant difference in the results in terms of bone width and thickness. Both methods, nevertheless, produced outcomes that were acceptable.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study protocol was retrospectively registered on the trial registry \"Clinical trials.gov PRS\".</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov ID is: NCT06604819 and the registration date is 20/9/2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":47251,"journal":{"name":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg","volume":"29 1","pages":"82"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11996989/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does ozone gel enhance the bone width and buccal plate of bone thickness surrounding the implant following osseodensification? A randomized controlled clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Dina Yousry, Raafat Riad, Rehab A Soliman, Mohamed ElSholkamy\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10006-025-01367-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of using ozone gel with transcrestal sinus elevation using osteotomes, on the bone width and the buccal plate of bone thickness around the implants placed simultaneously.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 30 sinuses with an average residual alveolar bone height ranging from 4-7 mm participated in this randomized controlled clinical trial. Following a closed sinus lift procedure, patients were randomized into two groups: one for the ozone gel recipient group and the other for control group. Cone beam computed tomography was carried out both immediately and four months postoperatively. Radiographic evaluations were performed to assess bone width and labial plate thickness at both crestal and midcrestal levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Radiographic analysis revealed that the mean bone width of the control group after four months postoperative was (8.54 ± 1.46 mm) compared to (8.96 ± 1.66 mm) in the study group, which was statistically insignificant (P ≤ .0.05). The mean labial plate of bone thickness value of the control group after four months postoperative was (1.86 ± 0.63 mm) compared to (1.89 ± 0.51 mm) in the study group. Although the bone dimensions in the study group was higher than the control group, it was statistically insignificant (P ≤ .0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When compared to the graftless group, the ozone gel recipient group showed non-significant difference in the results in terms of bone width and thickness. Both methods, nevertheless, produced outcomes that were acceptable.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study protocol was retrospectively registered on the trial registry \\\"Clinical trials.gov PRS\\\".</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov ID is: NCT06604819 and the registration date is 20/9/2024.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11996989/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-025-01367-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-025-01367-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does ozone gel enhance the bone width and buccal plate of bone thickness surrounding the implant following osseodensification? A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Purpose: The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of using ozone gel with transcrestal sinus elevation using osteotomes, on the bone width and the buccal plate of bone thickness around the implants placed simultaneously.
Materials and methods: A total of 30 sinuses with an average residual alveolar bone height ranging from 4-7 mm participated in this randomized controlled clinical trial. Following a closed sinus lift procedure, patients were randomized into two groups: one for the ozone gel recipient group and the other for control group. Cone beam computed tomography was carried out both immediately and four months postoperatively. Radiographic evaluations were performed to assess bone width and labial plate thickness at both crestal and midcrestal levels.
Results: Radiographic analysis revealed that the mean bone width of the control group after four months postoperative was (8.54 ± 1.46 mm) compared to (8.96 ± 1.66 mm) in the study group, which was statistically insignificant (P ≤ .0.05). The mean labial plate of bone thickness value of the control group after four months postoperative was (1.86 ± 0.63 mm) compared to (1.89 ± 0.51 mm) in the study group. Although the bone dimensions in the study group was higher than the control group, it was statistically insignificant (P ≤ .0.05).
Conclusion: When compared to the graftless group, the ozone gel recipient group showed non-significant difference in the results in terms of bone width and thickness. Both methods, nevertheless, produced outcomes that were acceptable.
Trial registration: This study protocol was retrospectively registered on the trial registry "Clinical trials.gov PRS".
Clinicaltrials: gov ID is: NCT06604819 and the registration date is 20/9/2024.
期刊介绍:
Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery founded as Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie is a peer-reviewed online journal. It is designed for clinicians as well as researchers.The quarterly journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in oral and maxillofacial surgery and interdisciplinary aspects of cranial, facial and oral diseases and their management. The journal publishes papers of the highest scientific merit and widest possible scope on work in oral and maxillofacial surgery as well as supporting specialties. Practice-oriented articles help improve the methods used in oral and maxillofacial surgery.Every aspect of oral and maxillofacial surgery is fully covered through a range of invited review articles, clinical and research articles, technical notes, abstracts, and case reports. Specific topics are: aesthetic facial surgery, clinical pathology, computer-assisted surgery, congenital and craniofacial deformities, dentoalveolar surgery, head and neck oncology, implant dentistry, oral medicine, orthognathic surgery, reconstructive surgery, skull base surgery, TMJ and trauma.Time-limited reviewing and electronic processing allow to publish articles as fast as possible. Accepted articles are rapidly accessible online.Clinical studies submitted for publication have to include a declaration that they have been approved by an ethical committee according to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki 1964 (last amendment during the 52nd World Medical Association General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, October 2000). Experimental animal studies have to be carried out according to the principles of laboratory animal care (NIH publication No 86-23, revised 1985).