抗蛇毒血清的成本:使用北美蛇咬伤登记处的成本最小化研究。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY
Benjamin Herzel, Neev Batavia, Paul Gavaza, Tammy Phan, Emmelyn Samones, Anne-Michelle Ruha, Jakub Furmaga, Christopher Hoyte, Brian J Wolk
{"title":"抗蛇毒血清的成本:使用北美蛇咬伤登记处的成本最小化研究。","authors":"Benjamin Herzel, Neev Batavia, Paul Gavaza, Tammy Phan, Emmelyn Samones, Anne-Michelle Ruha, Jakub Furmaga, Christopher Hoyte, Brian J Wolk","doi":"10.1007/s13181-025-01072-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Envenomation is a global health issue, with over 9,000 encounters managed in the United States yearly. The introduction of immunoglobulin fragment antivenom has reduced the risk of hypersensitivity. This study compares treatment costs of crotaline envenomation using the Fab and F(ab')<sub>2</sub> antivenoms as reported to the North American Snakebite Registry (NASBR), a nationwide surveillance tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of NASBR data between 2018 and 2020. The following data points were assessed: patient demographics (age, gender, race), snake species, type of antivenom used, and treatment costs. Unit costs were estimated based on United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data. Average (mean) per patient costs from the payer perspective were calculated by multiplying resources by the unit costs. Sensitivity analyses were performed regarding cost variance and snake species. All costs reported in this study are in U.S. dollars.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average total cost of treatment was $31,343 per person, with medications contributing 72% of the total. Average total cost among patients who received Fab treatments was $33,347 per person compared to $19,747 among patients who received F(ab')<sub>2</sub>. Antivenom costs accounted for 75% of the total cost in the Fab group and 42% in the F(ab')<sub>2</sub> group. F(ab')<sub>2</sub> required more vials than Fab (median 18 versus 10). Non-antivenom costs such as hospitalizations were higher in the F(ab')<sub>2</sub> group. Using average sale prices increased average total cost to $52,572; Fab remained more expensive.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Antivenom is the primary cost driver in snakebite treatment in North America. Treatment with F(ab')<sub>2</sub> resulted in lower overall costs, driven by lower cost of antivenom. F(ab')<sub>2</sub> did not significantly lower overall resource use except for blood product administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":16429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Cost of Antivenom: A Cost Minimization Study using the North American Snakebite Registry.\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Herzel, Neev Batavia, Paul Gavaza, Tammy Phan, Emmelyn Samones, Anne-Michelle Ruha, Jakub Furmaga, Christopher Hoyte, Brian J Wolk\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13181-025-01072-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Envenomation is a global health issue, with over 9,000 encounters managed in the United States yearly. The introduction of immunoglobulin fragment antivenom has reduced the risk of hypersensitivity. This study compares treatment costs of crotaline envenomation using the Fab and F(ab')<sub>2</sub> antivenoms as reported to the North American Snakebite Registry (NASBR), a nationwide surveillance tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of NASBR data between 2018 and 2020. The following data points were assessed: patient demographics (age, gender, race), snake species, type of antivenom used, and treatment costs. Unit costs were estimated based on United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data. Average (mean) per patient costs from the payer perspective were calculated by multiplying resources by the unit costs. Sensitivity analyses were performed regarding cost variance and snake species. All costs reported in this study are in U.S. dollars.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average total cost of treatment was $31,343 per person, with medications contributing 72% of the total. Average total cost among patients who received Fab treatments was $33,347 per person compared to $19,747 among patients who received F(ab')<sub>2</sub>. Antivenom costs accounted for 75% of the total cost in the Fab group and 42% in the F(ab')<sub>2</sub> group. F(ab')<sub>2</sub> required more vials than Fab (median 18 versus 10). Non-antivenom costs such as hospitalizations were higher in the F(ab')<sub>2</sub> group. Using average sale prices increased average total cost to $52,572; Fab remained more expensive.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Antivenom is the primary cost driver in snakebite treatment in North America. Treatment with F(ab')<sub>2</sub> resulted in lower overall costs, driven by lower cost of antivenom. F(ab')<sub>2</sub> did not significantly lower overall resource use except for blood product administration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-025-01072-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-025-01072-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中毒是一个全球性的健康问题,美国每年处理的中毒事件超过9000起。引入免疫球蛋白片段抗蛇毒血清降低了过敏的风险。这项研究比较了使用Fab和F(ab’)2抗蛇毒血清治疗crotaline中毒的费用,这些抗蛇毒血清报告给北美蛇咬伤登记(NASBR),这是一个全国性的监测工具。方法:回顾性分析2018 - 2020年NASBR数据。评估了以下数据点:患者人口统计学(年龄、性别、种族)、蛇的种类、使用的抗蛇毒血清类型和治疗费用。单位成本是根据美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的数据估计的。从付款人的角度来看,每个病人的平均成本是通过将资源乘以单位成本来计算的。对成本差异和蛇种类进行敏感性分析。本研究中报告的所有费用均以美元计算。结果:平均治疗总费用为31,343美元/人,其中药物费用占总费用的72%。接受Fab治疗的患者人均平均总费用为33,347美元,而接受F(ab)2治疗的患者人均平均总费用为19,747美元。抗蛇毒血清费用占Fab组总费用的75%,占F(ab)2组总费用的42%。F(ab')2比Fab需要更多的小瓶(中位数18比10)。非抗蛇毒血清费用,如住院费用,在F(ab)2组较高。使用平均销售价格将平均总成本提高到52,572美元;Fab仍然更贵。结论:抗蛇毒血清是北美地区蛇咬伤治疗费用的主要驱动因素。由于抗蛇毒血清的成本较低,使用F(ab')2治疗导致总体成本较低。除血液制品外,F(ab')2没有显著降低总体资源使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Cost of Antivenom: A Cost Minimization Study using the North American Snakebite Registry.

Envenomation is a global health issue, with over 9,000 encounters managed in the United States yearly. The introduction of immunoglobulin fragment antivenom has reduced the risk of hypersensitivity. This study compares treatment costs of crotaline envenomation using the Fab and F(ab')2 antivenoms as reported to the North American Snakebite Registry (NASBR), a nationwide surveillance tool.

Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of NASBR data between 2018 and 2020. The following data points were assessed: patient demographics (age, gender, race), snake species, type of antivenom used, and treatment costs. Unit costs were estimated based on United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data. Average (mean) per patient costs from the payer perspective were calculated by multiplying resources by the unit costs. Sensitivity analyses were performed regarding cost variance and snake species. All costs reported in this study are in U.S. dollars.

Results: The average total cost of treatment was $31,343 per person, with medications contributing 72% of the total. Average total cost among patients who received Fab treatments was $33,347 per person compared to $19,747 among patients who received F(ab')2. Antivenom costs accounted for 75% of the total cost in the Fab group and 42% in the F(ab')2 group. F(ab')2 required more vials than Fab (median 18 versus 10). Non-antivenom costs such as hospitalizations were higher in the F(ab')2 group. Using average sale prices increased average total cost to $52,572; Fab remained more expensive.

Conclusion: Antivenom is the primary cost driver in snakebite treatment in North America. Treatment with F(ab')2 resulted in lower overall costs, driven by lower cost of antivenom. F(ab')2 did not significantly lower overall resource use except for blood product administration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Toxicology (JMT) is a peer-reviewed medical journal dedicated to advances in clinical toxicology, focusing on the diagnosis, management, and prevention of poisoning and other adverse health effects resulting from medications, chemicals, occupational and environmental substances, and biological hazards. As the official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT), JMT is managed by an editorial board of clinicians as well as scientists and thus publishes research that is relevant to medical toxicologists, emergency physicians, critical care specialists, pediatricians, pre-hospital providers, occupational physicians, substance abuse experts, veterinary toxicologists, and policy makers.       JMT articles generate considerable interest in the lay media, with 2016 JMT articles cited by various social media sites, the Boston Globe, and the Washington Post among others.     For questions or comments about the journal, please contact jmtinfo@acmt.net.    For questions or comments about the journal, please contact jmtinfo@acmt.net.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信