Gustavo F Telles, Larissa R Souto, Marcella F Pazzinatto, Fernanda Serighelli, Leandro A C Nogueira, Danilo De Oliveira Silva
{"title":"跑步时穿压缩袜不会改变生理、跑步表现和知觉结果：一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Gustavo F Telles, Larissa R Souto, Marcella F Pazzinatto, Fernanda Serighelli, Leandro A C Nogueira, Danilo De Oliveira Silva","doi":"10.1123/jsr.2024-0410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Compression socks are a popular feature for runners and are widely advertised by the industry. Limited high-quality evidence has summarized the effects of compression socks during running. We aimed to investigate the effects of wearing compression socks compared with placebo or regular socks during running on physiological parameters, running performance, and perceptual outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022330437). Five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science) were searched. Clinical trials exploring the effect of compression socks during running on physiological parameters, performance, and perceptual outcomes were included. The Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 28 trials (600 runners), with 16 trials (284 runners) contributing to meta-analysis. For physiological outcomes (eg, heart rate mean difference [95% CI = 0.82 [-0.39 to 2.03] and blood lactate concentration mean difference [95% CI] = 0.30 [-0.39 to 0.98]), pooled analysis indicated low to moderate-certainty evidence that compression socks do not differ from regular socks. For running performance (eg, running speed mean difference [95% CI] = -0.24 [-0.79 to 0.31] and time to exhaustion standardized mean difference [95% CI] = -0.26 [-0.65 to 0.13]), pooled analysis indicated very low to low-certainty evidence that compression socks do not differ from regular socks. For perceptual outcomes (eg, perceived exertion standardized mean difference [95% CI] = 0.06 [-0.17 to 0.29] and lower limb muscle soreness standardized mean difference [95% CI] = 0.08 [-0.35 to 0.51]), pooled analysis indicated very low to moderate-certainty evidence that compression socks do not differ from regular socks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is very low to moderate-certainty evidence that wearing compression socks during running does not benefit physiological, running performance, or perceptual outcomes compared with regular socks.</p>","PeriodicalId":50041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wearing Compression Socks During Running Does Not Change Physiological, Running Performance, and Perceptual Outcomes: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Gustavo F Telles, Larissa R Souto, Marcella F Pazzinatto, Fernanda Serighelli, Leandro A C Nogueira, Danilo De Oliveira Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/jsr.2024-0410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Compression socks are a popular feature for runners and are widely advertised by the industry. Limited high-quality evidence has summarized the effects of compression socks during running. We aimed to investigate the effects of wearing compression socks compared with placebo or regular socks during running on physiological parameters, running performance, and perceptual outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022330437). Five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science) were searched. Clinical trials exploring the effect of compression socks during running on physiological parameters, performance, and perceptual outcomes were included. The Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 28 trials (600 runners), with 16 trials (284 runners) contributing to meta-analysis. For physiological outcomes (eg, heart rate mean difference [95% CI = 0.82 [-0.39 to 2.03] and blood lactate concentration mean difference [95% CI] = 0.30 [-0.39 to 0.98]), pooled analysis indicated low to moderate-certainty evidence that compression socks do not differ from regular socks. For running performance (eg, running speed mean difference [95% CI] = -0.24 [-0.79 to 0.31] and time to exhaustion standardized mean difference [95% CI] = -0.26 [-0.65 to 0.13]), pooled analysis indicated very low to low-certainty evidence that compression socks do not differ from regular socks. For perceptual outcomes (eg, perceived exertion standardized mean difference [95% CI] = 0.06 [-0.17 to 0.29] and lower limb muscle soreness standardized mean difference [95% CI] = 0.08 [-0.35 to 0.51]), pooled analysis indicated very low to moderate-certainty evidence that compression socks do not differ from regular socks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is very low to moderate-certainty evidence that wearing compression socks during running does not benefit physiological, running performance, or perceptual outcomes compared with regular socks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0410\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0410","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Wearing Compression Socks During Running Does Not Change Physiological, Running Performance, and Perceptual Outcomes: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.
Background: Compression socks are a popular feature for runners and are widely advertised by the industry. Limited high-quality evidence has summarized the effects of compression socks during running. We aimed to investigate the effects of wearing compression socks compared with placebo or regular socks during running on physiological parameters, running performance, and perceptual outcomes.
Methods: The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022330437). Five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science) were searched. Clinical trials exploring the effect of compression socks during running on physiological parameters, performance, and perceptual outcomes were included. The Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias.
Results: We included 28 trials (600 runners), with 16 trials (284 runners) contributing to meta-analysis. For physiological outcomes (eg, heart rate mean difference [95% CI = 0.82 [-0.39 to 2.03] and blood lactate concentration mean difference [95% CI] = 0.30 [-0.39 to 0.98]), pooled analysis indicated low to moderate-certainty evidence that compression socks do not differ from regular socks. For running performance (eg, running speed mean difference [95% CI] = -0.24 [-0.79 to 0.31] and time to exhaustion standardized mean difference [95% CI] = -0.26 [-0.65 to 0.13]), pooled analysis indicated very low to low-certainty evidence that compression socks do not differ from regular socks. For perceptual outcomes (eg, perceived exertion standardized mean difference [95% CI] = 0.06 [-0.17 to 0.29] and lower limb muscle soreness standardized mean difference [95% CI] = 0.08 [-0.35 to 0.51]), pooled analysis indicated very low to moderate-certainty evidence that compression socks do not differ from regular socks.
Conclusion: There is very low to moderate-certainty evidence that wearing compression socks during running does not benefit physiological, running performance, or perceptual outcomes compared with regular socks.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Sport Rehabilitation (JSR) is your source for the latest peer-reviewed research in the field of sport rehabilitation. All members of the sports-medicine team will benefit from the wealth of important information in each issue. JSR is completely devoted to the rehabilitation of sport and exercise injuries, regardless of the age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status of the participant.
JSR publishes peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, critically appraised topics (CATs), case studies/series, and technical reports that directly affect the management and rehabilitation of injuries incurred during sport-related activities, irrespective of the individual’s age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status. The journal is intended to provide an international, multidisciplinary forum to serve the needs of all members of the sports medicine team, including athletic trainers/therapists, sport physical therapists/physiotherapists, sports medicine physicians, and other health care and medical professionals.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
