结合机器学习和比较有效性方法研究退伍军人抑郁症的初级保健药物治疗途径。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Medical Care Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-22 DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000002145
Ozgur Ozmen, Everett Rush, Byung H Park, Makoto Jones, Jodie Trafton, Lisa Brenner, Randall W Rupper, Merry Ward, Jonathan R Nebeker, Steven D Pizer
{"title":"结合机器学习和比较有效性方法研究退伍军人抑郁症的初级保健药物治疗途径。","authors":"Ozgur Ozmen, Everett Rush, Byung H Park, Makoto Jones, Jodie Trafton, Lisa Brenner, Randall W Rupper, Merry Ward, Jonathan R Nebeker, Steven D Pizer","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To demonstrate an innovative method combining machine learning with comparative effectiveness research techniques and to investigate a hitherto unstudied question about the effectiveness of common prescribing patterns.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>United States Veterans Health Administration Corporate Data Warehouse.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>For Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom veterans with major depressive disorder, we generate pharmacotherapy pathways (of antidepressants) using process mining and machine learning. We select the medication episodes that were started at subtherapeutic doses by the first assigned primary care physician and observe the paths that those medication episodes follow. Using 2-stage least squares, we test the effectiveness of starting at a low dose and staying low for longer versus ramping up fast while balancing observable and unobservable characteristics of patients and providers through instrumental variables. We leverage predetermined provider practice patterns as instruments.</p><p><strong>Data collection: </strong>We collected outpatient pharmacy data for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, patient and provider characteristics (as control variables), and the instruments for our cohort. All data were extracted for the period between 2006 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>There is a statistically significant positive effect (0.68, 95% CI 0.11-1.25) of \"ramping up fast\" on engagement in care. When we examine the effect of \"ramping up slow\", we see an insignificant negative impact on engagement in care (-0.82, 95% CI -1.89 to 0.25). As expected, the probability of drop-out also seems to have a negative effect on engagement in care (-0.39, 95% CI -0.94 to 0.17). We further validate these results by testing with medication possession ratios calculated periodically as an alternative engagement in care metric.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings contradict the \"Start low, go slow\" adage, indicating that ramping up the dose of an antidepressant faster has a significantly positive effect on engagement in care for our population.</p>","PeriodicalId":18364,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care","volume":"63 6","pages":"422-429"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combining Machine Learning and Comparative Effectiveness Methodology to Study Primary Care Pharmacotherapy Pathways for Veterans With Depression.\",\"authors\":\"Ozgur Ozmen, Everett Rush, Byung H Park, Makoto Jones, Jodie Trafton, Lisa Brenner, Randall W Rupper, Merry Ward, Jonathan R Nebeker, Steven D Pizer\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To demonstrate an innovative method combining machine learning with comparative effectiveness research techniques and to investigate a hitherto unstudied question about the effectiveness of common prescribing patterns.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>United States Veterans Health Administration Corporate Data Warehouse.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>For Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom veterans with major depressive disorder, we generate pharmacotherapy pathways (of antidepressants) using process mining and machine learning. We select the medication episodes that were started at subtherapeutic doses by the first assigned primary care physician and observe the paths that those medication episodes follow. Using 2-stage least squares, we test the effectiveness of starting at a low dose and staying low for longer versus ramping up fast while balancing observable and unobservable characteristics of patients and providers through instrumental variables. We leverage predetermined provider practice patterns as instruments.</p><p><strong>Data collection: </strong>We collected outpatient pharmacy data for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, patient and provider characteristics (as control variables), and the instruments for our cohort. All data were extracted for the period between 2006 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>There is a statistically significant positive effect (0.68, 95% CI 0.11-1.25) of \\\"ramping up fast\\\" on engagement in care. When we examine the effect of \\\"ramping up slow\\\", we see an insignificant negative impact on engagement in care (-0.82, 95% CI -1.89 to 0.25). As expected, the probability of drop-out also seems to have a negative effect on engagement in care (-0.39, 95% CI -0.94 to 0.17). We further validate these results by testing with medication possession ratios calculated periodically as an alternative engagement in care metric.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings contradict the \\\"Start low, go slow\\\" adage, indicating that ramping up the dose of an antidepressant faster has a significantly positive effect on engagement in care for our population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Care\",\"volume\":\"63 6\",\"pages\":\"422-429\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002145\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002145","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:展示一种将机器学习与比较有效性研究技术相结合的创新方法,并研究迄今为止尚未研究的关于常见处方模式有效性的问题。数据来源:美国退伍军人健康管理局公司数据仓库。研究设计:对于患有严重抑郁症的持久自由行动/伊拉克自由行动退伍军人,我们使用过程挖掘和机器学习生成(抗抑郁药)药物治疗途径。我们选择由第一个指定的初级保健医生以亚治疗剂量开始的药物发作,并观察这些药物发作的路径。使用两阶段最小二乘法,我们测试了从低剂量开始并保持较长时间的低剂量与快速增加的有效性,同时通过工具变量平衡患者和提供者的可观察和不可观察特征。我们利用预先确定的提供者实践模式作为工具。数据收集:我们收集了选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂和选择性去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂的门诊药房数据,患者和提供者特征(作为控制变量),以及我们队列的工具。所有数据均为2006年至2020年期间的数据。主要发现:“快速提升”对参与护理有统计学上显著的积极影响(0.68,95% CI 0.11-1.25)。当我们检查“缓慢上升”的影响时,我们发现对护理投入的负面影响不显著(-0.82,95% CI -1.89至0.25)。正如预期的那样,退出的概率似乎也对参与护理有负面影响(-0.39,95% CI -0.94至0.17)。我们通过定期计算药物占有率作为替代参与护理度量来进一步验证这些结果。结论:我们的研究结果与“低起点,慢节奏”的格言相矛盾,表明更快地增加抗抑郁药的剂量对我们的人群的护理有显著的积极作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combining Machine Learning and Comparative Effectiveness Methodology to Study Primary Care Pharmacotherapy Pathways for Veterans With Depression.

Objectives: To demonstrate an innovative method combining machine learning with comparative effectiveness research techniques and to investigate a hitherto unstudied question about the effectiveness of common prescribing patterns.

Data sources: United States Veterans Health Administration Corporate Data Warehouse.

Study design: For Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom veterans with major depressive disorder, we generate pharmacotherapy pathways (of antidepressants) using process mining and machine learning. We select the medication episodes that were started at subtherapeutic doses by the first assigned primary care physician and observe the paths that those medication episodes follow. Using 2-stage least squares, we test the effectiveness of starting at a low dose and staying low for longer versus ramping up fast while balancing observable and unobservable characteristics of patients and providers through instrumental variables. We leverage predetermined provider practice patterns as instruments.

Data collection: We collected outpatient pharmacy data for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, patient and provider characteristics (as control variables), and the instruments for our cohort. All data were extracted for the period between 2006 and 2020.

Principal findings: There is a statistically significant positive effect (0.68, 95% CI 0.11-1.25) of "ramping up fast" on engagement in care. When we examine the effect of "ramping up slow", we see an insignificant negative impact on engagement in care (-0.82, 95% CI -1.89 to 0.25). As expected, the probability of drop-out also seems to have a negative effect on engagement in care (-0.39, 95% CI -0.94 to 0.17). We further validate these results by testing with medication possession ratios calculated periodically as an alternative engagement in care metric.

Conclusions: Our findings contradict the "Start low, go slow" adage, indicating that ramping up the dose of an antidepressant faster has a significantly positive effect on engagement in care for our population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Care
Medical Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
228
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. This timely journal reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信