评估颈椎稳定运动对慢性颈部疼痛的影响:一项系统综述。

IF 1.6 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Nikita Saini, Snigdha Tiwari, Lalli Singh
{"title":"评估颈椎稳定运动对慢性颈部疼痛的影响:一项系统综述。","authors":"Nikita Saini, Snigdha Tiwari, Lalli Singh","doi":"10.1002/msc.70091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic neck pain (CNP) significantly impacts individuals' quality of life and functional capacity. Cervical stabilisation exercises (CSEs), targeting deep cervical muscles and improving postural alignment, have emerged as a promising intervention. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of CSEs in managing CNP.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effectiveness of CSEs in alleviating pain, improving function, and enhancing quality of life in individuals with CNP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of the literature was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Searches were performed across PubMed, Scopus, and the PEDro. Eligible studies included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published within the past 10 years. Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria, with most rated as moderate to high quality. Findings demonstrated that CSEs significantly reduce pain (as measured by VAS and NRS), improve functional capacity (e.g., Neck Disability Index), and correct postural abnormalities such as forward head posture. Multimodal interventions combining CSEs with manual therapy, thermotherapy, or dynamic exercises yielded superior outcomes compared with CSEs alone. Intervention duration of 6-8 weeks was most effective. Variability in outcomes was attributed to differences in population characteristics and methodological quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CSEs are an effective, evidence-based intervention for managing CNP. Tailored programs, particularly those integrating multimodal approaches, enhance therapeutic outcomes. Future research should focus on long-term effects and subpopulation-specific benefits to optimise clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":46945,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Care","volume":"23 2","pages":"e70091"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Impact of Cervical Stabilisation Exercises on Chronic Neck Pain: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Nikita Saini, Snigdha Tiwari, Lalli Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/msc.70091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic neck pain (CNP) significantly impacts individuals' quality of life and functional capacity. Cervical stabilisation exercises (CSEs), targeting deep cervical muscles and improving postural alignment, have emerged as a promising intervention. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of CSEs in managing CNP.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effectiveness of CSEs in alleviating pain, improving function, and enhancing quality of life in individuals with CNP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of the literature was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Searches were performed across PubMed, Scopus, and the PEDro. Eligible studies included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published within the past 10 years. Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria, with most rated as moderate to high quality. Findings demonstrated that CSEs significantly reduce pain (as measured by VAS and NRS), improve functional capacity (e.g., Neck Disability Index), and correct postural abnormalities such as forward head posture. Multimodal interventions combining CSEs with manual therapy, thermotherapy, or dynamic exercises yielded superior outcomes compared with CSEs alone. Intervention duration of 6-8 weeks was most effective. Variability in outcomes was attributed to differences in population characteristics and methodological quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CSEs are an effective, evidence-based intervention for managing CNP. Tailored programs, particularly those integrating multimodal approaches, enhance therapeutic outcomes. Future research should focus on long-term effects and subpopulation-specific benefits to optimise clinical implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Musculoskeletal Care\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"e70091\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Musculoskeletal Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.70091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.70091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性颈部疼痛(CNP)显著影响个体的生活质量和功能能力。颈椎稳定练习(cse),针对颈椎深部肌肉和改善姿势对齐,已成为一种有希望的干预措施。本系统综述评估了CSEs治疗CNP的疗效。目的:探讨CSEs在缓解CNP患者疼痛、改善功能和提高生活质量方面的有效性。方法:按照PRISMA指南对文献进行系统回顾。通过PubMed、Scopus和PEDro进行搜索。符合条件的研究包括在过去10年内发表的随机对照试验(RCTs)。采用PEDro量表评估方法学质量。结果:12项研究符合纳入标准,其中大多数被评为中等至高质量。研究结果表明,CSEs可显著减轻疼痛(通过VAS和NRS测量),改善功能能力(如颈部残疾指数),并纠正姿势异常,如头部前倾姿势。与单独的CSEs相比,将CSEs与手工疗法、热疗法或动态锻炼相结合的多模式干预产生了更好的结果。干预时间6 ~ 8周最有效。结果的可变性归因于人群特征和方法质量的差异。结论:cse是治疗CNP有效的循证干预措施。量身定制的方案,特别是那些整合多模式方法的方案,可以提高治疗效果。未来的研究应侧重于长期效果和亚人群特异性益处,以优化临床实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Impact of Cervical Stabilisation Exercises on Chronic Neck Pain: A Systematic Review.

Background: Chronic neck pain (CNP) significantly impacts individuals' quality of life and functional capacity. Cervical stabilisation exercises (CSEs), targeting deep cervical muscles and improving postural alignment, have emerged as a promising intervention. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of CSEs in managing CNP.

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of CSEs in alleviating pain, improving function, and enhancing quality of life in individuals with CNP.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Searches were performed across PubMed, Scopus, and the PEDro. Eligible studies included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published within the past 10 years. Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale.

Results: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria, with most rated as moderate to high quality. Findings demonstrated that CSEs significantly reduce pain (as measured by VAS and NRS), improve functional capacity (e.g., Neck Disability Index), and correct postural abnormalities such as forward head posture. Multimodal interventions combining CSEs with manual therapy, thermotherapy, or dynamic exercises yielded superior outcomes compared with CSEs alone. Intervention duration of 6-8 weeks was most effective. Variability in outcomes was attributed to differences in population characteristics and methodological quality.

Conclusion: CSEs are an effective, evidence-based intervention for managing CNP. Tailored programs, particularly those integrating multimodal approaches, enhance therapeutic outcomes. Future research should focus on long-term effects and subpopulation-specific benefits to optimise clinical implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Care
Musculoskeletal Care RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Care is a peer-reviewed journal for all health professionals committed to the clinical delivery of high quality care for people with musculoskeletal conditions and providing knowledge to support decision making by professionals, patients and policy makers. This journal publishes papers on original research, applied research, review articles and clinical guidelines. Regular topics include patient education, psychological and social impact, patient experiences of health care, clinical up dates and the effectiveness of therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信