直接初级保健医师与其他执业模式医师职业倦怠及成就感的比较。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Melissa E Boylan, Deborah M Hurley
{"title":"直接初级保健医师与其他执业模式医师职业倦怠及成就感的比较。","authors":"Melissa E Boylan, Deborah M Hurley","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Primary care internal medicine and family medicine physicians experience the second and sixth highest rates of burnout among all medical specialties. Direct primary care (DPC) is an understudied model of practice in which physicians are believed to have lower rates of burnout. In this study, we surveyed primary care physicians to assess burnout and fulfillment rates as well as quantify several burnout risk factors in DPC and non-DPC practicing physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Stanford Professional Fulfillment Index was used to measure physician fulfillment and burnout in a select population of currently practicing primary care physicians in the southeastern United States. Physicians were classified by current practice model as DPC or non-DPC (self-identified). Data were analyzed to assess whether any differences existed in physician fulfillment, burnout, and other practice characteristics by medical practice/payment model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DPC physicians had significantly lower burnout (<i>P</i> = 0.002) and higher fulfillment scores (<i>P</i> = 0.013) compared with non-DPC physicians despite working a similar number of hours per week (<i>P</i> = 0.923). DPC physicians had a higher rate of practice ownership (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and saw a lower number of patients per day (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results show that compared with non-DPC physicians, physicians practicing the DPC model of care experience greater professional fulfillment and lower burnout. Given these significant results and the small sample size of this study, more research is warranted. A larger sample size and additional data collection would increase statistical power to better evaluate clinic and physician characteristics, allow for further exploration of the findings from this study, and increase the generalizability of results.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"118 5","pages":"275-280"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Burnout and Fulfillment Rates between Physicians in Direct Primary Care and Other Practice Models.\",\"authors\":\"Melissa E Boylan, Deborah M Hurley\",\"doi\":\"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001821\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Primary care internal medicine and family medicine physicians experience the second and sixth highest rates of burnout among all medical specialties. Direct primary care (DPC) is an understudied model of practice in which physicians are believed to have lower rates of burnout. In this study, we surveyed primary care physicians to assess burnout and fulfillment rates as well as quantify several burnout risk factors in DPC and non-DPC practicing physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Stanford Professional Fulfillment Index was used to measure physician fulfillment and burnout in a select population of currently practicing primary care physicians in the southeastern United States. Physicians were classified by current practice model as DPC or non-DPC (self-identified). Data were analyzed to assess whether any differences existed in physician fulfillment, burnout, and other practice characteristics by medical practice/payment model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DPC physicians had significantly lower burnout (<i>P</i> = 0.002) and higher fulfillment scores (<i>P</i> = 0.013) compared with non-DPC physicians despite working a similar number of hours per week (<i>P</i> = 0.923). DPC physicians had a higher rate of practice ownership (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and saw a lower number of patients per day (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results show that compared with non-DPC physicians, physicians practicing the DPC model of care experience greater professional fulfillment and lower burnout. Given these significant results and the small sample size of this study, more research is warranted. A larger sample size and additional data collection would increase statistical power to better evaluate clinic and physician characteristics, allow for further exploration of the findings from this study, and increase the generalizability of results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"118 5\",\"pages\":\"275-280\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001821\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001821","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:初级保健内科医生和家庭医学医生的职业倦怠率在所有医学专业中排名第二和第六。直接初级保健(DPC)是一种尚未充分研究的实践模式,其中医生被认为有较低的倦怠率。在本研究中,我们调查了初级保健医生,以评估职业倦怠和满意度,并量化了DPC和非DPC执业医生的几个职业倦怠风险因素。方法:采用斯坦福专业实现指数来衡量美国东南部一群目前执业的初级保健医生的医生实现和职业倦怠。根据当前的实践模式,将医生分为DPC或非DPC(自我认定)。通过对数据进行分析,以评估在医生满意度、职业倦怠和其他执业特征方面是否存在差异。结果:尽管DPC医生每周工作时间相似(P = 0.923),但与非DPC医生相比,DPC医生的职业倦怠(P = 0.002)和成就感得分(P = 0.013)显著降低(P = 0.002)。DPC医生有较高的执业拥有率(P < 0.001),每天看到的病人数量较少(P < 0.001)。结论:结果显示,与非DPC模式的医生相比,实施DPC模式的医生有更高的职业成就感和更低的职业倦怠。鉴于这些重要的结果和本研究的小样本量,需要进行更多的研究。更大的样本量和更多的数据收集将增加统计能力,以更好地评估临床和医生的特征,允许进一步探索本研究的发现,并增加结果的普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Burnout and Fulfillment Rates between Physicians in Direct Primary Care and Other Practice Models.

Objectives: Primary care internal medicine and family medicine physicians experience the second and sixth highest rates of burnout among all medical specialties. Direct primary care (DPC) is an understudied model of practice in which physicians are believed to have lower rates of burnout. In this study, we surveyed primary care physicians to assess burnout and fulfillment rates as well as quantify several burnout risk factors in DPC and non-DPC practicing physicians.

Methods: The Stanford Professional Fulfillment Index was used to measure physician fulfillment and burnout in a select population of currently practicing primary care physicians in the southeastern United States. Physicians were classified by current practice model as DPC or non-DPC (self-identified). Data were analyzed to assess whether any differences existed in physician fulfillment, burnout, and other practice characteristics by medical practice/payment model.

Results: DPC physicians had significantly lower burnout (P = 0.002) and higher fulfillment scores (P = 0.013) compared with non-DPC physicians despite working a similar number of hours per week (P = 0.923). DPC physicians had a higher rate of practice ownership (P < 0.001) and saw a lower number of patients per day (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Results show that compared with non-DPC physicians, physicians practicing the DPC model of care experience greater professional fulfillment and lower burnout. Given these significant results and the small sample size of this study, more research is warranted. A larger sample size and additional data collection would increase statistical power to better evaluate clinic and physician characteristics, allow for further exploration of the findings from this study, and increase the generalizability of results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Southern Medical Journal
Southern Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
222
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Birmingham, Alabama-based Southern Medical Association (SMA), the Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) has for more than 100 years provided the latest clinical information in areas that affect patients'' daily lives. Now delivered to individuals exclusively online, the SMJ has a multidisciplinary focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists in all relevant aspects of the profession, including medicine and medical specialties, surgery and surgery specialties; child and maternal health; mental health; emergency and disaster medicine; public health and environmental medicine; bioethics and medical education; and quality health care, patient safety, and best practices. Each month, articles span the spectrum of medical topics, providing timely, up-to-the-minute information for both primary care physicians and specialists. Contributors include leaders in the healthcare field from across the country and around the world. The SMJ enables physicians to provide the best possible care to patients in this age of rapidly changing modern medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信