Meiry-Dashti Lian, Yaacov G Bachner, Achinoam Ben Akiva-Maliniak, Rabinovitz Sassoon Tzlil, Barak Sharon
{"title":"迈向自我报告累积缺陷虚弱量表(Sr-CDFS):一种新的虚弱量表的发展和临床特性。","authors":"Meiry-Dashti Lian, Yaacov G Bachner, Achinoam Ben Akiva-Maliniak, Rabinovitz Sassoon Tzlil, Barak Sharon","doi":"10.1519/JPT.0000000000000441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Frailty, a multidimensional syndrome, is linked with heightened risk of adverse outcomes. Targeted physical therapy interventions for individuals with frailty have proven beneficial, underscoring the value of routine frailty assessment in both clinical and research settings. This study aimed to: (1) describe development of a simple self-report cumulative deficits frailty scale (Sr-CDFS); (2) establish the criterion validity of Sr-CDFS against the commonly used Fried's frailty scale and Study of Osteoporotic Fracture criteria (SOF); and (3) assess other concurrent validity and internal consistency of the new Sr-CDFS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 230 older adults (M age = 79.27 ± 7.42 years), with 76.5% being women. Outcome measures were: (1) validated frailty scales, including Fried's frailty phenotype, SOF, and Sr-CDFS; and (2) a battery of tests for impairment, activity limitations, and health status. Data analysis involved calculating frailty prevalence using the validated frailty scales. The clinimetric properties of the Sr-CDFS were assessed against validated frailty scales. Convergent and discriminative validity of the Sr-CDFS were examined. Internal consistency and structure were evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and exploratory factor analysis.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>No differences (P = .80) in frailty prevalence were found between Fried (26.1%) and SOF (25.2%) methods. The Sr-CDFS exhibited excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = .92), with reliability of questionnaire components (health, falls, physical, cognitive, socioemotional function) ranging from .73 (falls) to .90 (physical ability). Additionally, the Sr-CDFS demonstrated convergent and discriminative validity, with its total score and various parts correlating significantly with most outcomes (r = .25-.59, P < .05). Using K1-criterion and a scree plot, we identified a 5-factor solution that had a common variance of 63.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The newly developed Sr-CDFS exhibits robust clinimetric properties with good-to-excellent reliability and validity. The newly developed Sr-CDFS has the potential to increase the feasibility of assessing frailty in clinical settings or large-scale epidemiological studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a Self-Report Cumulative Deficits Frailty Scale (Sr-CDFS): Development and Clinimetric Properties of a Novel Frailty Scale.\",\"authors\":\"Meiry-Dashti Lian, Yaacov G Bachner, Achinoam Ben Akiva-Maliniak, Rabinovitz Sassoon Tzlil, Barak Sharon\",\"doi\":\"10.1519/JPT.0000000000000441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Frailty, a multidimensional syndrome, is linked with heightened risk of adverse outcomes. Targeted physical therapy interventions for individuals with frailty have proven beneficial, underscoring the value of routine frailty assessment in both clinical and research settings. This study aimed to: (1) describe development of a simple self-report cumulative deficits frailty scale (Sr-CDFS); (2) establish the criterion validity of Sr-CDFS against the commonly used Fried's frailty scale and Study of Osteoporotic Fracture criteria (SOF); and (3) assess other concurrent validity and internal consistency of the new Sr-CDFS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 230 older adults (M age = 79.27 ± 7.42 years), with 76.5% being women. Outcome measures were: (1) validated frailty scales, including Fried's frailty phenotype, SOF, and Sr-CDFS; and (2) a battery of tests for impairment, activity limitations, and health status. Data analysis involved calculating frailty prevalence using the validated frailty scales. The clinimetric properties of the Sr-CDFS were assessed against validated frailty scales. Convergent and discriminative validity of the Sr-CDFS were examined. Internal consistency and structure were evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and exploratory factor analysis.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>No differences (P = .80) in frailty prevalence were found between Fried (26.1%) and SOF (25.2%) methods. The Sr-CDFS exhibited excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = .92), with reliability of questionnaire components (health, falls, physical, cognitive, socioemotional function) ranging from .73 (falls) to .90 (physical ability). Additionally, the Sr-CDFS demonstrated convergent and discriminative validity, with its total score and various parts correlating significantly with most outcomes (r = .25-.59, P < .05). Using K1-criterion and a scree plot, we identified a 5-factor solution that had a common variance of 63.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The newly developed Sr-CDFS exhibits robust clinimetric properties with good-to-excellent reliability and validity. The newly developed Sr-CDFS has the potential to increase the feasibility of assessing frailty in clinical settings or large-scale epidemiological studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000441\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000441","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Toward a Self-Report Cumulative Deficits Frailty Scale (Sr-CDFS): Development and Clinimetric Properties of a Novel Frailty Scale.
Background and purpose: Frailty, a multidimensional syndrome, is linked with heightened risk of adverse outcomes. Targeted physical therapy interventions for individuals with frailty have proven beneficial, underscoring the value of routine frailty assessment in both clinical and research settings. This study aimed to: (1) describe development of a simple self-report cumulative deficits frailty scale (Sr-CDFS); (2) establish the criterion validity of Sr-CDFS against the commonly used Fried's frailty scale and Study of Osteoporotic Fracture criteria (SOF); and (3) assess other concurrent validity and internal consistency of the new Sr-CDFS.
Methods: The study included 230 older adults (M age = 79.27 ± 7.42 years), with 76.5% being women. Outcome measures were: (1) validated frailty scales, including Fried's frailty phenotype, SOF, and Sr-CDFS; and (2) a battery of tests for impairment, activity limitations, and health status. Data analysis involved calculating frailty prevalence using the validated frailty scales. The clinimetric properties of the Sr-CDFS were assessed against validated frailty scales. Convergent and discriminative validity of the Sr-CDFS were examined. Internal consistency and structure were evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and exploratory factor analysis.
Results and discussion: No differences (P = .80) in frailty prevalence were found between Fried (26.1%) and SOF (25.2%) methods. The Sr-CDFS exhibited excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = .92), with reliability of questionnaire components (health, falls, physical, cognitive, socioemotional function) ranging from .73 (falls) to .90 (physical ability). Additionally, the Sr-CDFS demonstrated convergent and discriminative validity, with its total score and various parts correlating significantly with most outcomes (r = .25-.59, P < .05). Using K1-criterion and a scree plot, we identified a 5-factor solution that had a common variance of 63.9%.
Conclusion: The newly developed Sr-CDFS exhibits robust clinimetric properties with good-to-excellent reliability and validity. The newly developed Sr-CDFS has the potential to increase the feasibility of assessing frailty in clinical settings or large-scale epidemiological studies.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy is the leading source of clinically applicable evidence for achieving optimal health, wellness, mobility, and physical function across the continuum of health status for the aging adult.
The mission of the Academy of Geriatric Physical Therapy is building a community that advances the profession of physical therapy to optimize the experience of aging.