伊利诺斯强奸神话接受量表-微妙版本(IRMA-S-2022)和新开发的强奸神话问卷-简短形式(RMQ-S)在塞尔维亚文化中的心理测量学评价。

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Ana Genc, Damjan Kopilović, Bojana M Dinić
{"title":"伊利诺斯强奸神话接受量表-微妙版本(IRMA-S-2022)和新开发的强奸神话问卷-简短形式(RMQ-S)在塞尔维亚文化中的心理测量学评价。","authors":"Ana Genc, Damjan Kopilović, Bojana M Dinić","doi":"10.1177/10790632251334755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rape myths are false beliefs about rape that blame the victim and excuse the person who committed rape. This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of two rape myth acceptance scales in Serbian culture: the Serbian adaptation of the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale - Subtle Version (IRMA-S-2022) and the newly developed Rape Myth Questionnaire - Short Form (RMQ-S) in Serbian. The sample comprised 601 adults (50.9% men) from the general population of Serbia. The results revealed the five-factor in addition to the bifactor five-factor model as the best solution for the IRMA-S-2022, whereas the RMQ-S showed a one-factor structure. Scores on both instruments were gender invariant, with men obtaining higher scores. Furthermore, the scores showed good reliability based on internal consistency. The high correlation between the two instruments confirmed their convergent validity, as well as positive correlations with hostile sexism and victim culpability. Overall, the results support the reliability and construct validity of both instruments, and indicate that the RMQ-S is a useful nine-item tool, whereas the IRMA-S-2022 offers deeper insights into the acceptance of various subcategories of rape myths.</p>","PeriodicalId":21828,"journal":{"name":"Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"10790632251334755"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Psychometric Evaluation of the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale - Subtle Version (IRMA-S-2022) and the Newly Developed Rape Myth Questionnaire - Short Form (RMQ-S) in Serbian Culture.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Genc, Damjan Kopilović, Bojana M Dinić\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10790632251334755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Rape myths are false beliefs about rape that blame the victim and excuse the person who committed rape. This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of two rape myth acceptance scales in Serbian culture: the Serbian adaptation of the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale - Subtle Version (IRMA-S-2022) and the newly developed Rape Myth Questionnaire - Short Form (RMQ-S) in Serbian. The sample comprised 601 adults (50.9% men) from the general population of Serbia. The results revealed the five-factor in addition to the bifactor five-factor model as the best solution for the IRMA-S-2022, whereas the RMQ-S showed a one-factor structure. Scores on both instruments were gender invariant, with men obtaining higher scores. Furthermore, the scores showed good reliability based on internal consistency. The high correlation between the two instruments confirmed their convergent validity, as well as positive correlations with hostile sexism and victim culpability. Overall, the results support the reliability and construct validity of both instruments, and indicate that the RMQ-S is a useful nine-item tool, whereas the IRMA-S-2022 offers deeper insights into the acceptance of various subcategories of rape myths.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10790632251334755\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10790632251334755\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10790632251334755","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

强奸神话是关于强奸的错误信念,指责受害者并原谅强奸者。本研究旨在评估塞尔维亚文化中两种强奸神话接受量表的心理测量特征:塞尔维亚版的伊利诺伊强奸神话接受量表-微妙版(IRMA-S-2022)和新开发的塞尔维亚版强奸神话问卷-简短版(RMQ-S)。样本包括来自塞尔维亚普通人群的601名成年人(50.9%为男性)。结果表明,IRMA-S-2022的最佳解决方案为五因子外加二因子五因子模型,而RMQ-S则为单因子结构。两种工具的得分都是性别不变的,男性得分更高。此外,基于内部一致性,得分表现出良好的信度。这两种工具之间的高相关性证实了它们的趋同效度,以及与敌对性别歧视和受害者罪责的正相关。总体而言,结果支持两种工具的信度和结构效度,并表明RMQ-S是一个有用的九项工具,而IRMA-S-2022则对强奸神话的各个子类别的接受程度提供了更深入的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Psychometric Evaluation of the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale - Subtle Version (IRMA-S-2022) and the Newly Developed Rape Myth Questionnaire - Short Form (RMQ-S) in Serbian Culture.

Rape myths are false beliefs about rape that blame the victim and excuse the person who committed rape. This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of two rape myth acceptance scales in Serbian culture: the Serbian adaptation of the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale - Subtle Version (IRMA-S-2022) and the newly developed Rape Myth Questionnaire - Short Form (RMQ-S) in Serbian. The sample comprised 601 adults (50.9% men) from the general population of Serbia. The results revealed the five-factor in addition to the bifactor five-factor model as the best solution for the IRMA-S-2022, whereas the RMQ-S showed a one-factor structure. Scores on both instruments were gender invariant, with men obtaining higher scores. Furthermore, the scores showed good reliability based on internal consistency. The high correlation between the two instruments confirmed their convergent validity, as well as positive correlations with hostile sexism and victim culpability. Overall, the results support the reliability and construct validity of both instruments, and indicate that the RMQ-S is a useful nine-item tool, whereas the IRMA-S-2022 offers deeper insights into the acceptance of various subcategories of rape myths.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
17.40%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信