多弧体积调制电弧治疗与定场调强放疗在计划靶体积较大的妇科肿瘤治疗中的应用

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Jia-Ling Song, Yi-Zhao Zhang, Zhi-Long Zhang, Zheng-Feng Fu, Peng-Fei Sun
{"title":"多弧体积调制电弧治疗与定场调强放疗在计划靶体积较大的妇科肿瘤治疗中的应用","authors":"Jia-Ling Song, Yi-Zhao Zhang, Zhi-Long Zhang, Zheng-Feng Fu, Peng-Fei Sun","doi":"10.1007/s13246-025-01538-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To investigate the dosimetry and delivery efficiency differences between multi-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and fixed-field intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the treatment of gynecological cancer with large planning target volume (PTV). Thirteen patients with gynecological cancer (9 cervical and 4 vulvar) with a PTV greater than 1600 cm<sup>3</sup> were retrospectively selected. Three-arc VMAT (3ARC) and seven-field IMRT plans were generated using identical objective functions from clinical two-arc VMAT (2ARC) plans to allow a rigorous comparison for each patient. Target coverage, OARs sparing, integral dose and delivery efficiency were compared through dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis. Compared with 2ARC plans, IMRT exhibited a slightly superior target coverage with higher D<sub>98%</sub>, CI and lower D<sub>2%</sub>, D<sub>50%</sub>, V<sub>110%</sub> and HI (P < 0.01). For OARs, IMRT produced lower V<sub>40Gy</sub> and D<sub>mean</sub> to the bladder and rectum (P < 0.01) and lower V<sub>40Gy</sub> to bone marrow than 2ARC (P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed for the colon, small bowel and femoral heads, while 2ARC performed worse at the low dose and integral dose to normal tissue (V<sub>5Gy</sub>, V<sub>10Gy</sub> and NTID, P < 0.01). Nevertheless, IMRT increased MUs by 1.65% and EDT by 107 s compared to 2ARC. Compared with 2ARC, 3ARC showed no improvement in target dose coverage, including D<sub>98%</sub>, D<sub>2%</sub>, D<sub>50%</sub>, V<sub>110%</sub>, CI and HI to PTV, but increased the doses to OARs (D<sub>mean</sub> to the bladder, rectum and bone marrow, V<sub>40Gy</sub> to the bone marrow and D<sub>5%</sub> to both the left and right femoral heads, P < 0.05), low dose and integral dose to normal tissue (V<sub>10Gy</sub>,V<sub>15Gy</sub>,V<sub>20Gy</sub> and NTID, P < 0.01) and simultaneously prolonged the EDT (P < 0.001). In the treatment of gynecological cancer with a large planning target volume, the IMRT technique can be delivered superior conformal dose to the target with somewhat better OARs sparing but increasing the estimated delivery time.</p>","PeriodicalId":48490,"journal":{"name":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The application of multi-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy and fixed-field intensity modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of gynecologic cancer with large planning target volume.\",\"authors\":\"Jia-Ling Song, Yi-Zhao Zhang, Zhi-Long Zhang, Zheng-Feng Fu, Peng-Fei Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13246-025-01538-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To investigate the dosimetry and delivery efficiency differences between multi-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and fixed-field intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the treatment of gynecological cancer with large planning target volume (PTV). Thirteen patients with gynecological cancer (9 cervical and 4 vulvar) with a PTV greater than 1600 cm<sup>3</sup> were retrospectively selected. Three-arc VMAT (3ARC) and seven-field IMRT plans were generated using identical objective functions from clinical two-arc VMAT (2ARC) plans to allow a rigorous comparison for each patient. Target coverage, OARs sparing, integral dose and delivery efficiency were compared through dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis. Compared with 2ARC plans, IMRT exhibited a slightly superior target coverage with higher D<sub>98%</sub>, CI and lower D<sub>2%</sub>, D<sub>50%</sub>, V<sub>110%</sub> and HI (P < 0.01). For OARs, IMRT produced lower V<sub>40Gy</sub> and D<sub>mean</sub> to the bladder and rectum (P < 0.01) and lower V<sub>40Gy</sub> to bone marrow than 2ARC (P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed for the colon, small bowel and femoral heads, while 2ARC performed worse at the low dose and integral dose to normal tissue (V<sub>5Gy</sub>, V<sub>10Gy</sub> and NTID, P < 0.01). Nevertheless, IMRT increased MUs by 1.65% and EDT by 107 s compared to 2ARC. Compared with 2ARC, 3ARC showed no improvement in target dose coverage, including D<sub>98%</sub>, D<sub>2%</sub>, D<sub>50%</sub>, V<sub>110%</sub>, CI and HI to PTV, but increased the doses to OARs (D<sub>mean</sub> to the bladder, rectum and bone marrow, V<sub>40Gy</sub> to the bone marrow and D<sub>5%</sub> to both the left and right femoral heads, P < 0.05), low dose and integral dose to normal tissue (V<sub>10Gy</sub>,V<sub>15Gy</sub>,V<sub>20Gy</sub> and NTID, P < 0.01) and simultaneously prolonged the EDT (P < 0.001). In the treatment of gynecological cancer with a large planning target volume, the IMRT technique can be delivered superior conformal dose to the target with somewhat better OARs sparing but increasing the estimated delivery time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-025-01538-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-025-01538-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

探讨多弧体积调制电弧治疗(VMAT)与固定场强度调制放疗(IMRT)治疗大规划靶体积(PTV)妇科肿瘤的剂量学及递送效率差异。回顾性选择PTV大于1600 cm3的妇科肿瘤患者13例(宫颈9例,外阴4例)。三弧VMAT (3ARC)和七场IMRT计划使用临床二弧VMAT (2ARC)计划的相同目标函数生成,以便对每位患者进行严格比较。通过剂量-体积直方图(DVH)分析比较靶覆盖率、OARs节约、整体剂量和给药效率。与2弧计划相比,强度表现出稍微优越目标D98%较高的覆盖率,CI和低D2% D50%, V110%嗨(P 40 gy Dmean膀胱和直肠(P 40 gy骨髓比2弧(P 5 gy, V10Gy NTID, P 98%, D2%, D50%, V110%, CI和PTV你好,但增加了剂量桨(Dmean膀胱、直肠和骨髓,V40Gy骨髓和D5%左和右股骨,P 10 gy, V15Gy, V20Gy NTID, P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The application of multi-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy and fixed-field intensity modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of gynecologic cancer with large planning target volume.

To investigate the dosimetry and delivery efficiency differences between multi-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and fixed-field intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the treatment of gynecological cancer with large planning target volume (PTV). Thirteen patients with gynecological cancer (9 cervical and 4 vulvar) with a PTV greater than 1600 cm3 were retrospectively selected. Three-arc VMAT (3ARC) and seven-field IMRT plans were generated using identical objective functions from clinical two-arc VMAT (2ARC) plans to allow a rigorous comparison for each patient. Target coverage, OARs sparing, integral dose and delivery efficiency were compared through dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis. Compared with 2ARC plans, IMRT exhibited a slightly superior target coverage with higher D98%, CI and lower D2%, D50%, V110% and HI (P < 0.01). For OARs, IMRT produced lower V40Gy and Dmean to the bladder and rectum (P < 0.01) and lower V40Gy to bone marrow than 2ARC (P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed for the colon, small bowel and femoral heads, while 2ARC performed worse at the low dose and integral dose to normal tissue (V5Gy, V10Gy and NTID, P < 0.01). Nevertheless, IMRT increased MUs by 1.65% and EDT by 107 s compared to 2ARC. Compared with 2ARC, 3ARC showed no improvement in target dose coverage, including D98%, D2%, D50%, V110%, CI and HI to PTV, but increased the doses to OARs (Dmean to the bladder, rectum and bone marrow, V40Gy to the bone marrow and D5% to both the left and right femoral heads, P < 0.05), low dose and integral dose to normal tissue (V10Gy,V15Gy,V20Gy and NTID, P < 0.01) and simultaneously prolonged the EDT (P < 0.001). In the treatment of gynecological cancer with a large planning target volume, the IMRT technique can be delivered superior conformal dose to the target with somewhat better OARs sparing but increasing the estimated delivery time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信